The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 15:02, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Campaignbox War of the Ring (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template only has two entries, and they are both included in the Middle-earth and the Lord of the Rings templates already. Chiswick Chap (talk) 21:36, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Not needed anymore. --Gonnym (talk) 22:41, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Middle-earth peoples and animals (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused on any pages. All links already appear on ((Middle-earth)). Gonnym (talk) 19:30, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Redundant. Chiswick Chap (talk) 21:34, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 15:03, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Middle-earth elves (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template has 4 links and trasncluded only on one of them. ((Middle-earth)) already has all links and is transcluded on all articles. Gonnym (talk) 17:55, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Redundant. Chiswick Chap (talk) 21:35, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 08:14, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Giovanni Pierluigi da Palestrina (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not very useful as it stands currently. Has a small list of his compositions (there's already a comprehensive "List of" his works). The remaining information (Style etc.) can be easily found on his biography. —capmo (talk) 14:47, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Templates for composers are considered useful and worth keeping if there are 3 or 4 directly relevant blue links. This template clearly makes that hurdle.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:02, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - most of the 'List' entries do not yet have articles, but there is no hurry: when each article is written it can be added here. The template is already useful for navigating the existing articles and will become more so as it grows. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:01, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per those above. Useful and commonplace for such artists. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 07:32, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Current other (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Appears to be unfixably broken by recent changes to the software. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:31, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Unused and seems to be broken currently. If there is demand for this template more effort could be put into trying to fix it, but I doubt it's possible. ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 10:05, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).