Template:Инфокутија Научник
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Already deleted per WP:G2 by User:Plastikspork (non-admin closure) -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 17:56, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Content calls itself repeatedly, meaningless template. -- Alcremie (talk) 21:09, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Category:Australia Basketball Olympics squad navigational boxes
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Primefac (talk) 01:23, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Propose merging Template:Infobox business school rankings with Template:Infobox university rankings.
Couldn't these contents be merged? PPEMES (talk) 13:20, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I believe the challenge here is mostly the syntax and complexity. it would be helpful to see a merged template to know what is involved in merging the two. Frietjes (talk) 17:34, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support merging Two subjects not very different to each other. Accesscrawl (talk) 13:24, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Comparison of business schools in particular is an independently notable concept and having a separate template helps editors by making it easier to edit. I don't support a single merge to a large and complex super template, as I don't see how that makes it easier for readres or editors.--Tom (LT) (talk) 23:19, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:10, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Tom (LT): Have you considered the development of the above nomination discussion? PPEMES (talk) 09:21, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.Relisting comment: Other discussion regarding second template closed as merge but there's no consensus here at the moment. Relisting for more opinions.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:01, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).