The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Already deleted per WP:G2 by User:Plastikspork (non-admin closure) -KAP03 (^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 17:56, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Инфокутија Научник (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Content calls itself repeatedly, meaningless template. -- Alcremie (talk) 21:09, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 01:22, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Australia Men Basketball Squad 1956 Summer Olympics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Australia Men Basketball Squad 1964 Summer Olympics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Australia Men Basketball Squad 1972 Summer Olympics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Australia Men Basketball Squad 1976 Summer Olympics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Australia Men Basketball Squad 1980 Summer Olympics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Australia Men Basketball Squad 1984 Summer Olympics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Australia Men Basketball Squad 1988 Summer Olympics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Australia Men Basketball Squad 1992 Summer Olympics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Australia Women Basketball Squad 1984 Summer Olympics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Australia Women Basketball Squad 1988 Summer Olympics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose deleting navboxes for teams that finished the tournament in lower than third place. Such templates are subject to WP:TCREEP and per previous discussions, for example, Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 January 9#AfroBasket squad navigational boxes and Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 March 29#Men's Basketball Squad 2000 Summer Olympics navboxes, they were always deleted. – Sabbatino (talk) 12:25, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• delete per precedent (over navboxing). Frietjes (talk) 16:59, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• delete per nom. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 20:15, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Primefac (talk) 01:23, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Infobox business school rankings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Infobox university rankings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Infobox business school rankings with Template:Infobox university rankings.
Couldn't these contents be merged? PPEMES (talk) 13:20, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the challenge here is mostly the syntax and complexity. it would be helpful to see a merged template to know what is involved in merging the two. Frietjes (talk) 17:34, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Support merging Two subjects not very different to each other. Accesscrawl (talk) 13:24, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose Comparison of business schools in particular is an independently notable concept and having a separate template helps editors by making it easier to edit. I don't support a single merge to a large and complex super template, as I don't see how that makes it easier for readres or editors.--Tom (LT) (talk) 23:19, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Tom (LT): Have you considered the development of the above nomination discussion? PPEMES (talk) 09:21, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).