The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:GHS pictograms overview. (non-admin closure) ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 08:13, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:GHSp (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template was deprecated with a note saying to use one of the specific versions. If this template should indeed not be used anymore, then this template should then instead redirect to Template:GHS pictograms overview which shows the available GSH-related templates. Gonnym (talk) 14:33, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Agree, or Delete. (I deprecated this one recently). Not only should (or must, in ((Chembox))) the pictograms be entered directly; ((GHSp)) claims to accomodate GHS-phrases (like H241 and P263 code). But these codes and their texts are not maintained and so may be out of date. So if kept, a redirect to documentation (as is proposed) is the safe & sound option. -DePiep (talk) 16:41, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• If this template doubles with an otherone, it is quit simple: delete. On the other hand, when I try to get any documentation on template:GHSref (when I search for template:GHS I am redirected to template:GHSref), I send in circles, but do not get any information. So before deletion, please document GHSref. :-(. T.vanschaik (talk) 18:53, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

((GHSref)) is badly documentated indeed, but I don't see shat that has to do with this. -DePiep (talk) 23:10, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).