The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 7. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 19:18, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Module:See_also_if_exists (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Module:Category_see_also_if_exists (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. The discussion is arguing about its usage. But there is no result. Feel to userfy it for Legoktm if you still believe it should be deleted. Hope this template will be used in some articles.delete Feel free to userfy if someone wants to do (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 01:19, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Puke (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and seemly inappropriate template. I'm guessing this is supposed to be subst-only? I'd say stick to WP:TROUT... Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 23:59, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unless convincing reason to remain is found. --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - seems pretty offensive. --Gonnym (talk) 07:50, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete; never used. Jc86035 (talk) 11:22, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  @Jc86035: I just used it and it didn't show up in search from that link ~ R.T.G 13:40, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  @RTG: That's because you didn't substitute it. The search would only match your use of the template if you'd substituted it, since it searches for part of the contents of the template and not the name of the template. Jc86035 (talk) 13:46, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  @Jc86035: Understood and done, thanks. ~ R.T.G 13:49, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• We created the template after there was an excessive amount of people people trouting people for the silliest things and it was getting somewhat ridiculous, I think. It's very clearly a joke, given the message contents and the TINC banner on the template page itself. I'm not sure how it could be offensive. I didn't expect for it to ever be used. If people are intent on deletion, please userfy it for me. Legoktm (talk) 07:44, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Neutral ~ R.T.G 13:40, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  @RTG: Why? Jc86035 (talk) 13:42, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  @Jc86035:Why? Because he used suicide as a joke and people got offended and he rubbished them for it. Endless bad faith, puke. Check out the talk section on WPSignpost humour page for this month and you'll get the idea. ~ R.T.G 13:44, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  @RTG: No, I meant, why should we keep the template? I'm not disagreeing of your use of it, although you're the only person who's ever used it. Just saying "keep", as I'm sure you're aware, is not really a substantive argument. Jc86035 (talk) 13:48, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  @Jc86035: I suppose, because it is puking on McCandlish. I think that is very substantive! A more serious opinion? Awk, it's probably not very constructive, and it's too big. The words suggest it was used only once for a specific issue. Maybe it would be okay in a reduced image format without the text, so it could be used in comments, but you'd have to use it a lot for it to catch on. ~ R.T.G 13:55, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  I edited mine to neutral. Aside from bad faith in a discussion, or a banner saying, "This page contains puke," I can't see any quirky or practical uses. I substituted my use and have no further requirement of it. ~ R.T.G 10:31, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I just received one of these, over a matter of "probably beyond ((Whale))" socio-political interest to the community at large, and found it both hilarious and effective in getting the templater's message across. Given that I just posted something recently in my own defense that "this is not NeverOffendPedia", I'd be hypocritical to argue to censor a humor-not-humor template just because some people might be offended by it.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  13:53, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  @SMcCandlish: I think the nomination is more "no one ever used this" than "this is offensive", since the use on your talk page (as mentioned above) is so far the only use of the template. Jc86035 (talk) 13:58, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  Now that's funny, ~ R.T.G 14:01, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  Hmm. I generally buy that argument for utility templates (if not used, there is no utility). I'm not sure it's so good for community-interaction ones intended for project and user space. Given my talk-page-stalker rate (which has probably markedly increased over the last 3 days), it might see more use. :-) Sometimes templates languish due to orphaning and can get picked up after they've appeared in a few places. (Categorization and inclusion in lists of templates also plays a role.)  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  14:04, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and then re-purpose as 🤮, which could see a lot more uses. —Kusma (t·c) 14:13, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  That actually works for me, too. This does make more sense as an emoji wrapper.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  00:28, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 01:05, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:PulitzerPrize HistoryAuthors (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox that is superseded by Template:PulitzerPrize History Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 23:58, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - will note that Template:PulitzerPrize HistoryAuthors 1917–1925, Template:PulitzerPrize HistoryAuthors 1926–1950, Template:PulitzerPrize HistoryAuthors 1951–1975, Template:PulitzerPrize HistoryAuthors 1976–2000 and Template:PulitzerPrize HistoryAuthors 2001–2025 should have been also nominated, as per WP:BIDIRECTIONAL, the main template should be placed on all articles it links to, so these would be placed on the same exact templates. --Gonnym (talk) 07:50, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all (as the template creator) per Gonnym.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 13:20, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No objection to deletion. Shashank5988 (talk) 21:18, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 8. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 01:06, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Punjab_Gharana_Lineage_Tree (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deleted by @Fastily. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 03:54, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Punjab MLAs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox, no parent article, mostly redlinks. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 23:56, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• The parent article is Punjab_Legislative_Assembly. I believe the intention was to use it as a nesting template, for government administration periods, but only one relevant template has been added so far 2007-2012, and the others have not been created yet, so it's just one template within a template as it stands. ~ R.T.G 10:49, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 01:06, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Purveyors to the Royal Court of Austria-Hungary (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent article. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 23:55, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• The parent article is Imperial and Royal Warrant of Appointment. But the navbox is rather incomplete and was also apparently created as part of a promotional campaign. So delete. —Kusma (t·c) 14:23, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:T-Team F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with mostly red links Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:25, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhkohh (talk) 10:45, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@GiantSnowman: you may be interested in this discussion Hhkohh (talk) 10:57, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 10:58, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I don't think the club is notable enough to merit a navbox. GiantSnowman 11:00, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• delete most of players fail WP:NFOOTY, so these articles should not be created Hhkohh (talk) 23:51, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:36, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:TRT 1 programming (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent article and full of red links Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:25, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - 3 links only. Also as a personal opinion, these style of navboxes are pointless as the fact that they share a channel has almost no relevance to a reader. A reader would more likely care about similar programs on different channels broadcast at the same year (Modern Family and Big Bang Theory) then two different programs on the same channel which were broadcast years apart. For those cases where a reader does want to read the broadcast history, we have a List of X article and categories. --Gonnym (talk) 07:50, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:04, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Tai Chung FC squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent article. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:24, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - it actually does have a parent article at Resources Capital FC, however that article does not list a squad so this navbox is pointless. The article should be created before a navbox which can't be verified and kept updated. --Gonnym (talk) 07:50, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 14:03, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per Gonnym. GiantSnowman 14:06, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:17, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:TamilNaduStatewideOfficials (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent article. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:24, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Out of date. --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - seems to be replaced by Template:Government of Tamil Nadu. --Gonnym (talk) 07:50, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as outdated. Shashank5988 (talk) 21:19, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:36, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Tchadense (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent article. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:24, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - parent article does not exists and there are only 2 links even if it did. --Gonnym (talk) 07:50, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:36, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Television in Europe categories (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent article. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:24, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• It is not supposed to have a parent article, as it is only for navigation of categories. Television in Europe and Category:Television in Europe are the obvious places to use it, but it doesn't even seem to have ever been used there. delete. —Kusma (t·c) 14:29, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as unused. Category:Television in Europe by country serves the same purpose for category space navigation. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 05:24, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Primefac (talk) 11:32, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Television stations in Afghanistan (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent article. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:24, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Use. Template provides useful navigational links. If it were included in target articles then it could be maintained. --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Use - agree with Tom. Has potential, similar to Template:American broadcast television (English). --Gonnym (talk) 07:50, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 7. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:21, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Telford_and_Wrekin (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:21, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:The Real World (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent article and not helpful navigation Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:24, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - this does have a parent article at Real World (TV series) but it is replaced by Template:RWRR. --Gonnym (talk) 07:50, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:22, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Tianjin Radio (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent article and all red links Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:23, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Full of red links.--Tom (LT) (talk) 07:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - nothing to navigate to. --Gonnym (talk) 07:50, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Note it was speedily deleted after realizing that it is redundant to Template:Tirunelveli district. I am closing my own TFD as an admin has already deleted the template. I DID NOT delete it. Just closing the discussion since it no longer serves any purpose. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 00:52, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Tirunelveli (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent article. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:23, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• There is a parent article: Tirunelveli. Some of the links, like the neighbourhoods, are valid, others are probably too generic or vague. – Uanfala (talk) 00:22, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 7. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:22, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Tokyo_Anime_Award_for_Domestic_Feature_Film (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:22, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Top Montenegrin male singles tennis players (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent article and no links Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:23, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom --DannyS712 (talk) 23:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom --Wolbo (talk) 10:48, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom --Fyunck(click) (talk) 06:43, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:23, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Topic (South America) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent article and all red links Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:23, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Not sure the point of this template --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - seems to be trying to do this -> Template:South America topic. --Gonnym (talk) 07:50, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom --DannyS712 (talk) 23:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:35, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Tours VB team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:22, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom --DannyS712 (talk) 23:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:35, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Town of Bassendean suburbs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent article. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:22, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom --DannyS712 (talk) 23:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:35, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Towns of Gippsland (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent article. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:22, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom --DannyS712 (talk) 23:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:34, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Townsville City (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:22, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom --DannyS712 (talk) 23:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 7. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:34, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Trademark-EU (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:34, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Tram and light rail transit in the European Union (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent article. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:21, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, also rather incomplete, with no clear criteria for inclusion. —Kusma (t·c) 07:02, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:34, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Trambesòs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with mostly plain text Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:21, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom --DannyS712 (talk) 23:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:04, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Turan Tovuz PFC squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with mostly red links Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:20, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom --DannyS712 (talk) 23:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 14:03, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 14:06, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - unused and outdated list. These type of navboxes go outdated very easily if not maintained by a dedicated editor, which templates really shouldn't need. --Gonnym (talk) 09:17, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:04, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Turkish Cup winners (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent article. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:20, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom --DannyS712 (talk) 23:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 14:03, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - these kind of navboxes are not standard. GiantSnowman 14:07, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• delete per GS Hhkohh (talk) 16:33, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:33, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Turtle categories (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent article. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:19, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom --DannyS712 (talk) 23:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:39, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Turów Zgorzelec current roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with mostly red links Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:19, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom --DannyS712 (talk) 23:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. It’s also about 2 years out of date so sounds like no one will miss it. Rikster2 (talk) 13:50, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The club withdrew from the Polish league last summer. Asturkian (talk) 09:13, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:24, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Twenty20 Cup 2009 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:19, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom --DannyS712 (talk) 23:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• A navbox that navigates between sections of the same article is totally useless (would need to use redirects to at least be in a workable state, but would still be completely useless). delete. —Kusma (t·c) 14:32, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:33, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:United Future MPs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with only 1 link Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:19, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom --DannyS712 (talk) 23:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Inferior duplicate of ((UAFA Football)). King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:26, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:UAFA associations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent article. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:18, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom --DannyS712 (talk) 23:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 14:07, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - there is a parent article at Union of Arab Football Associations and the template is not unused as nom falsely claims. @DannyS712: you might wish to re-think. GiantSnowman 14:10, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  @GiantSnowman: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:UAFA_associations shows no current usage, and the page you linked to is a red link. As far as I can tell, it is unused --DannyS712 (talk) 18:05, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@DannyS712: link corrected; and I've just noticed this template is a duplicate (in part) of ((UAFA Football)). I therefore suggest a merge and rename of the two templates to ((Union of Arab Football Associations)). GiantSnowman 18:35, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@GiantSnowman: The link still doesn't actually use this template --DannyS712 (talk) 18:39, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Eh? It's a duplicate, so of course it doesn't... GiantSnowman 18:41, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• merge to ((Union of Arab Football Associations)) as mainly folk of other template Hhkohh (talk) 16:36, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - nothing to merge as ((UAFA Football)) already has this information. Agree that the name should be changed. --Gonnym (talk) 09:20, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:24, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:UIL District 3-3A High Schools (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent article. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:18, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom --DannyS712 (talk) 23:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 02:37, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:UK Parliament benches (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent article. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:18, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and use. Links useful articles--Tom (LT) (talk) 07:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - added it to the articles as those articles used those links in a see also section anyways. --Gonnym (talk) 09:30, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:24, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Unicode chart CJK Unified Ideographs Extension B (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template with no clear purpose Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:17, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom --DannyS712 (talk) 23:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deleted by Fastily. Galobtter (pingó mió) 10:10, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Universitario de Sucre squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox that violates WP:ACCESS Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:15, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Not notable and unused. --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom --DannyS712 (talk) 23:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 14:07, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - even once updated there likely won't be sufficient blue links to merit a navbox. GiantSnowman 14:11, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:32, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:University of Cape Verde (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:14, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, all links are redirects to the same article. BLAIXX 01:08, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Unused.--Tom (LT) (talk) 07:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom --DannyS712 (talk) 23:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 7. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:25, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:United_Kingdom_Independent_Broadcasters (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 19. (non-admin closure) Sheldybett (talk) 00:38, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Urban_public_transport_in_Algeria (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:25, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Uriyangkhai people (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:13, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom --DannyS712 (talk) 23:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 7. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:25, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Urologic_procedures_in_women (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:26, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Victoria, Crown Princess of Sweden (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox, superseded by multiple others. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:07, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom --DannyS712 (talk) 23:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:32, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Spanish general election, 1979 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused election template. Data already present on article page. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:00, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Impru20^talk 16:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom --DannyS712 (talk) 23:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:32, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Spanish general elections (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused election template Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:00, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Impru20^talk 16:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom --DannyS712 (talk) 23:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:31, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Spanish senate election, 2004 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused election template Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:00, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Impru20^talk 16:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. 2004 Spanish general election#Senate seems to have an improved table. --Bsherr (talk) 16:39, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom --DannyS712 (talk) 23:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:31, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Summary of Vidhan Sabha elections (Nov 2010 - May 2015) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused election template that is broken anyway. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:00, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom --DannyS712 (talk) 23:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 7. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:30, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Swiss_Federal_Council_election_result (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 7. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:30, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Trinidad_and_Tobago_legislative_election,_2007 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 7. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:30, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Transnistrian_presidential_election,_2001 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 7. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:30, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Tokelau_Island_council_election,_2005 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:29, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Togo presidential election, 2005 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused election box. Not clear if there even is a parent article. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 21:46, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete There is a more detailed table at 2005 Togolese presidential election. Number 57 22:47, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 7. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:20, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Tamil_Nadu_legislative_election_results_by_alliance_1996 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:20, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:1977–78 Pacific Coast Athletic Association men's basketball standings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused template Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:48, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep now used at 1977–78 UC Irvine Anteaters men's basketball team after renaming to correct endash. Jweiss11 (talk) 19:13, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Jweiss11: that actually is not true. The information is on that page, but the Template is not transcluded on the page. --Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:52, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Procedural keep Per Jweiss11, it is being used.—Bagumba (talk) 15:11, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Jweiss11: ok so now it is used in ONE place. Why not just put the table on that page. There is no reason for a single use template. --Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:11, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Zackmann08, because all those other seasons like 1977–78 Fresno State State Bulldogs men's basketball team are as notable at 1977–78 UC Irvine Anteaters men's basketball team and should be created. This template will also be used at 1977–78 NCAA Division I men's basketball season, when that article is created. Rule of thumb: if you're cherry-picking off one or a few members of an established class of templates already in used on many articles, you probably should not be making the deletion nomination. Jweiss11 (talk) 19:16, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jweiss11: I'm not cherry picking anything... The template is unused. --Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:35, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Jweiss11, used in one article and potential use for other articles. —Kusma (t·c) 19:46, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Jweiss11. The template is now being used, and there is potential for more use in the future. Ejgreen77 (talk) 16:53, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 15. Primefac (talk) 11:38, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/Burnaby-Edmonds (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/Delta_South (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/Fort_Langley-Aldergrove (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/Fraser-Nicola (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/Juan_de_Fuca (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/Kamloops-North_Thompson (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/Kamloops-South_Thompson (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/Kootenay_East (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/Kootenay_West (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/Langley (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/Maple_Ridge-Mission (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/Nelson-Creston (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/New_Westminster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/North_Coast (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/North_Island (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/North_Vancouver-Lonsdale (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/North_Vancouver-Seymour (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/Peace_River_North (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/Peace_River_South (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/Penticton (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/Port_Coquitlam (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/Port_Moody-Coquitlam (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/Powell_River-Sunshine_Coast (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/Prince_George-Mackenzie (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/Prince_George-Valemount (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/Richmond_Centre (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/Richmond_East (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/Saanich_North_and_the_Islands (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/Saanich_South (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/Shuswap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/Skeena (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/Surrey-Cloverdale (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/Surrey-Fleetwood (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/Surrey-Newton (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/Surrey-Panorama (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/Surrey-Tynehead (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/Surrey-Whalley (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/Vancouver-Fairview (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/Vancouver-Hastings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/Vancouver-Kensington (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/Vancouver-Kingsway (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/Vancouver-Mount_Pleasant (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/Vancouver-Quilchena (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/Vernon-Monashee (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/West_Vancouver-Capilano (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/West_Vancouver-Sea_to_Sky (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:British_Columbia_provincial_election,_2013/Westside-Kelowna (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:28, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Portal-Info (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Portal-Info-Intro (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete. Unused, and no indication how it would be used. UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:15, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom --DannyS712 (talk) 23:22, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Apparently superseded by ((Portal maintenance status)) --Auric talk 12:47, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 7. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:20, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Turkish_general_election,_1950 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 7. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:19, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Turkish_general_election,_1954 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 7. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:19, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Turkish_general_election,_1957 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 7. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:18, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Turkish_general_election,_June_2015_nationwide_and_overseas (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 7. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:18, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Turkmenistani_presidential_election,_2012 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 7. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:18, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Turkmenistani_presidential_election,_2017 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 7. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:18, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:US_Virgin_Islands_governor_election,_2002 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 7. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:18, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:US_Virgin_Islands_senate_election,_2004 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 7. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:18, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:United_Kingdom_general_election,_2005 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 7. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:28, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:United_Kingdom_local_elections,_1909 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 7. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:28, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections,_2016_imagemap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:29, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:United States gubernatorial elections, 2017 imagemap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused election stats template Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 21:12, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom --DannyS712 (talk) 23:32, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:16, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Venezuelan presidential election, 1998 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused election stats template. Data already present on the article's page. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 21:12, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom --DannyS712 (talk) 23:32, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 7. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:16, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Western_Cape_provincial_election,_2004 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:16, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Winnipeg municipal by-election, 14 April 2005/Position/Councillor, St. Norbert (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused election stats template Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 21:11, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom --DannyS712 (talk) 23:32, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:15, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Winnipeg municipal election, 2006/Position/City Councillor, St. Norbert Ward (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused election stats template Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 21:11, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom --DannyS712 (talk) 23:32, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 7. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:15, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Wikipedia_categorization_navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:15, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Without Grace (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent article and no actual links. Just plaintext. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:24, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Without Grace was deleted awhile ago. This should go too. Nigej (talk) 20:39, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete WP:CSD#g8 - dependent on a deleted page; delete per nom --DannyS712 (talk) 23:32, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:29, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:World Surf League Women's Tour (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent article. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:24, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - per nom. Nigej (talk) 20:44, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:2014 in ASEAN football (AFF) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent article. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:24, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom --DannyS712 (talk) 23:32, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• delete non-standard. use AFC ones instead Hhkohh (talk) 23:14, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:13, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Bug and issue tracking systems (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent article. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:23, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - unused. Nigej (talk) 20:52, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - duplicate-ish of Template:Bug tracking systems. --Gonnym (talk) 21:34, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom --DannyS712 (talk) 23:32, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 8. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 05:31, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Bufo (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Briobecca Urayasu squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent article. Nearly entirely redlinks Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:23, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - not updated so useless anyway. Nigej (talk) 20:55, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 14:07, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - even once updated there likely won't be sufficient blue links to merit a navbox. GiantSnowman 14:11, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• delete most of players fail WP:NFOOTY, so these articles should not be created Hhkohh (talk) 23:50, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Brazil national under-23 football team matches (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent article. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:23, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 14:07, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - not needed. GiantSnowman 14:11, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• delete non-standard Hhkohh (talk) 16:38, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 7. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:12, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Boys'_Youth_European_Volleyball_Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 7. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:12, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Bora_Bora_family_tree (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:12, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Birmingham metro area schools (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent article. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:22, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Not notable. --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Nigej (talk) 20:18, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Userfy. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 01:12, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Bigs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent article. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:21, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• I will take this in my userspace if no others are willing to argue for its inclusion. This is great. Killiondude (talk) 05:48, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Userfy per above: cute navbox, but I can't really see how it could be used in articles. – Uanfala (talk) 00:10, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Userfy per above - basically no unifying feature between the pages other than the "Big" name. Nigej (talk) 20:16, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:11, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Big 10 Conference (West Virginia Scholastic conference) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with no parent article. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:21, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Struggling to find any actual content relating to this. Nigej (talk) 20:13, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 21:58, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Best Asian Film HKFA (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused navbox. Superseded by ((Hong Kong Film Awards)) Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:21, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Hong Kong Film Award for Best Asian Film notes the award but doesn't list the winners. Should be deleted since the list in the template is unreferenced. Nigej (talk) 20:10, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 19. Primefac (talk) 19:13, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Bernice_Summerfield_audios (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 7. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 21:57, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Bengali_desserts (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Belgian Footballer of the Year (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused navbox with no parent article. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:20, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 14:08, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as duplicate of ((Belgian Professional Footballer of the Year)). GiantSnowman 14:12, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• delete per GS Hhkohh (talk) 16:39, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - year out of date. presumably surplus to requirement. ((Belgian Golden Shoe)) exists too. Nigej (talk) 17:46, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Belarusian Second League seasons (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused navbox with no parent article. Entirely redlinks Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:20, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 14:08, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - again, there is a parent article (at Belarusian Second League), but these articles are not notable and the navbox is not needed. GiantSnowman 14:14, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - useless. Nigej (talk) 17:43, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• delete unnecessary Hhkohh (talk) 23:46, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 21:56, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Bears1940DraftPicks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused navbox with no parent article. Also violates WP:ACCESS Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:19, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose it is used on several pages. As far as WP:ACCESS goes the nominator may have a point, and should discuss this at WT:NFL but the other navbox links are not in the articles themselves.-UCO2009bluejay (talk) 15:06, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose. Navbox is now fully used. As far as this entire class of navboxes as a concept, a broader discussion would have to take place at WT:NFL before we should be taking any action there. Additionally, any WP:ACCESS concerns that may exist here actually involve a different template, not this one. Ejgreen77 (talk) 16:03, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I've raised the accessibility issue at Template talk:Chicago Bears Draft template list. Hopefully members of WP:NFL will take on board the problems caused for this and other similar templates. --RexxS (talk) 16:57, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I really don't see this as a huge problem. The list of draft years is a purely back-end tool that isn't visible when the template is deployed on an article (see usage at Len Akin). The average user never sees it and probably doesn't even know that it exists. Ejgreen77 (talk) 17:11, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • "The list of draft years ... isn't visible when the template is deployed on an article" and "The average user never sees it": If you're arguing that the list is so unimportant that we don't have to bother about the visually impaired being able to read it, then why would we bother having it at all? --RexxS (talk) 17:30, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
      • It's purely a back end navigational tool that's intended for editors, not for readers (though, arguably, Category:Chicago Bears draft navigational boxes performs the same function). The general public never sees it. Sure, we could delete it. Or, we could make it full sized (again, space constraints don't really matter here because it isn't displayed on pages that use the template). Either way, it's easily the least important part of this navbox, and using that as a justification for deletion is the definition of a ticky-tack argument. Ejgreen77 (talk) 17:44, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
        • But I'm not arguing for deletion. I think it ought to be kept. I just want the argument about accessibility settled so that I can oppose deletion without being side-tracked. --RexxS (talk) 18:26, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
          • You're not, no. That part of my comment was directed towards the original nominator who proposed this template for deletion arguing ACCESS on something that isn't displayed to the general public. Ejgreen77 (talk) 18:40, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
        • We have editors who have visual imparments, as well as readers. Why are their needs considered "ticky-tack"? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:09, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose This is a format of content that is highly acceptable on WP.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 02:47, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 7. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 21:56, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Batangas_labelled_map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 7. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 21:56, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Balrampur_district,_Chhattisgarh (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 9. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 04:45, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:BIG_Synergy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 21:55, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:BAF Leadership (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused navbox with no parent article. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:18, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - purports to be a current list but is at least 6 years out of date. Hammond is Chancellor of the Exchequer now. unused and forgotten. Nigej (talk) 11:54, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Ww2censor has now added it to numerous articles. No reason to delete it now. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:48, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Aviation accidents and incidents in Ireland (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused navbox with no parent article. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:18, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: this was discussed previously when it was not in use. The template is now in use in each of the articles listed so there is no reason to delete. There is also really no reason to have a parent article because that would only be a summery of the articles themselves and likely put up for deletion. If you think it so necessary, please be my guest and create it, but remember it's a navigation box. ww2censor (talk) 00:10, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep not unused, see no need for a parent article for this kind of navbox. ((3x|p))ery (talk) 00:27, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).