The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:New Testament people. No prejudice against a deletion nomination for the final product. Primefac (talk) 19:45, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:New Testament prophets (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:New Testament people (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:New Testament prophets with Template:New Testament people.
Might as well keep it all together, could we? PPEMES (talk) 17:28, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge per WP:TG (Templates that [...] substantially duplicate [...] the same functionality of established templates) - seems the only link missing is Prophets of Christianity, all other links are already in ((New Testament people)). --Gonnym (talk) 19:21, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:18, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete both. This kind of thing is much better left for categories. --woodensuperman 12:37, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 April 19. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 07:18, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Aramean_political_parties (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Assyrian_people_footer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 April 19. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 07:18, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Assyrian/Syriac/Chaldean_political_parties (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Assyrian_people_footer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Assyrian people footer. No opposition, reasonable arguments. Primefac (talk) 19:44, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:History of Assyrian people (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Assyrian people footer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:History of Assyrian people with Template:Assyrian people footer.
I'm afraid this concerns a rather contentious topic, which would be clear to any outsider taking a look into it. Possibly so in multiple dimensions: from ingroups perspectives as well outgroups, scientificially, geo-politically, religiously, and what not. Contents of both templates may be prone to be up for discussions, even recurringly. Keeping it all in one template, could that be a start? PPEMES (talk) 13:24, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge and use navbox (and later change the name of it) - Sidebar is intrusive and very under used (only 12 out of around 40 links have it). Seeing as how a lot of these articles overlap, it makes sense to merge what links aren't in the navbox. --Gonnym (talk) 14:07, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was history merged to Template:LDS Temple/Richmond Virginia Temple. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:07, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:LDS Temple/Richmond Virginia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Correctly named subtemplate exists at Template:LDS Temple/Richmond Virginia Temple Naraht (talk) 11:28, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:03, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Spectra (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is placed on the same articles that ((The Bold and the Beautiful)) is placed. No need to merge, just delete. Gonnym (talk) 06:35, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:01, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Newman (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is placed on the same articles that ((The Young and the Restless)) is placed. No need to merge, just delete. Gonnym (talk) 06:22, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete under WP:CSD#T3 as substantial duplication. --woodensuperman 12:38, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).