October 2
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 October 10. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 08:25, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:16TeamRR-2Group
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete the 2Group and 1Group templates. Please feel free to renominate the others if you would still like to see them deleted. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:42, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
can be replaced by Module:Sports results with adding some options to the module Hhkohh (talk) 15:31, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hhkohh, you probably want to add Template:8TeamRR-2Group as well. Frietjes (talk) 15:44, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- comment, I started "Template:5TeamRR/sandbox" to see if anything is lost in a replacement. other than the optional per-row colouring, it looks like we are missing the rank column and the ability to left-align the teams. so, if we can add those two optional features to Module:Sports results, we should be able to make the replacement without anything being lost. Frietjes (talk) 15:58, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- delete all the "2Group" and "1Group" templates (can be easily replaced by two calls to the standard templates). keep for the others, until we have a robust solution for replacing them with Module:Sports results that doesn't remove information. in particular, Template:6TeamRR and Template:8TeamRR will be the hardest to replace. Frietjes (talk) 18:40, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:54, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Unused except one in userspace. Please use ((Round16)) instead Hhkohh (talk) 15:25, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Sgcite
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 08:30, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The template was brought up at WT:RS#References citing wikipedia articles where the original poster was confused as to its purpose. Masem suggested (and I agree) that this should be replaced in favor of ((cite episode)) (where used as a reference) and inlined where otherwise (very few references in general--certainly not enough potentially or actually to warrant a special template). Izno (talk) 17:55, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete the fact that this template forces the target articles to have disambiguators is reason enough itself. ((3x|p))ery (talk) 23:56, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:06, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hhkohh (talk) 15:04, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Common univariate probability distributions
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:07, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Duplicates part of the navbox ((Probability distributions)). Suggesting just deleting this; no need to keep both on a page. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 03:11, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:2018 Asian Games men's basketball game B3
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:03, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Due to match format changed, this template is no longer used, please use Template:2018 Asian Games men's basketball game B1 instead. Also, Asian games is over Hhkohh (talk) 02:11, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).