The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 08:23, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:RSNSO (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Seems like a template that displayed a string of text for a long-deprecated notice board, and one transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 20:10, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Subst and delete per nom. Barely used, and won't be used in future. --Tom (LT) (talk) 01:01, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 January 5. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:08, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Vulgar_slang (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:39, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Coimbra (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

With category WP:EGGs and links to sections of the same article removed, there is nothing left to navigate. --woodensuperman 13:56, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. --Tom (LT) (talk) 01:01, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:33, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Association of Southeast and East Asian Catholic Colleges and Universities (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No primary topic, unused template Aloneinthewild (talk) 12:51, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:10, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 January 5. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:08, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:League_of_Legends_Challenger_Series_North_America (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:42, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Team Apex (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Team Apex, an esports team, disbanded in 2016. The template has incorrect information and has not been updated since its creation. It serves no meaningful purpose as it only lists players, and because the team no longer exists, if it was updated it would be empty. CentreLeftRight ✉ 09:22, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. No need for a navbox here, articles can link each other. --Tom (LT) (talk) 01:01, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:40, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Redirects for discussion (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

could someone please explain why this is needed and/or add some documentation so others know what is for? FASTILY 06:48, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Looks to me like any page using ((Monthly clean-up category/core)) via ((Monthly clean-up category)) is required to have a corresponding messages page if |message= is left blank. So, the only sane way to have no message (at the moment) is to have a blank messages page. Another option would be to add an "#ifexist" in there, but that's not there at the moment. You can find more of these with Special:PrefixIndex/Template:Monthly clean-up category/Messages/. Many are blank or transcluded ((Null)). Thanks! Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:30, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  I made the changes suggested by Plastikspork, so this page can be safely deleted along with

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/1911 Britannica articles needing updates))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Accuracy disputes))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles lacking in-text citations))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles lacking page references))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles lacking reliable references))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles lacking sources))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles needing POV-check))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles needing additional categories))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles needing additional medical references))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles needing additional references))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles needing attention))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles needing cleanup))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles needing more viewpoints))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles needing sections))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles needing the year an event occurred))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles prone to spam))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles requiring tables))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles slanted towards recent events))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles sourced by IMDb))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles sourced only by IMDb))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles that include images for deletion))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles that may be too long))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles that may contain original research))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles to be expanded))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles to be expanded with sources))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles to be redirected))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles to harmonize))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles with HTML markup))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles with a promotional tone))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles with bare URLs for citations))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles with close paraphrasing of public domain sources))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles with disproportional geographic scope))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles with disputed statements))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles with empty sections))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles with excessive see also sections))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles with ibid))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles with improper non-free content))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles with improper non-free content (lists)))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles with incomplete book citations))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles with incomplete citations))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles with limited geographic scope))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles with limited historical scope))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles with links needing disambiguation))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles with neologism issues))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles with obsolete information))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles with sections that need to be turned into a list))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles with sections that need to be turned into prose))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles with too few wikilinks))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles with too many wikilinks))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles with topics of unclear notability))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Articles with trivia sections))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Attempted de-orphan))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Autobiographical articles))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/BLP articles lacking sources))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Clean-up categories))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Cleanup tagged articles with a reason field))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Copied and pasted articles and sections))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Copied and pasted articles and sections with url provided))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Current events))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Deprecated templates))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Disambiguation pages containing one non-primary topic))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Disambiguation pages in need of cleanup))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Disambiguation pages with many incoming links))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/EngvarB))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Incomplete disambiguation))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Incomplete lists))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Lists having no precise inclusion criteria))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Living people on EN wiki who are dead on other wikis))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Low linked articles))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Miscellaneous pages that include images for deletion))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/NRHP articles with dead external links))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Orphaned articles))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Pages needing music examples))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Pages with excessive dablinks))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Pages with non-English text lacking appropriate markup))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Portals with untriaged subpages))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Recently revised))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Suspected copyright infringements without a source))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Talk pages that include images for deletion))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Templates that include images for deletion))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Type/Articles containing potentially dated statements))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Type/Articles lacking page references))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Uncategorized stubs))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Unreferenced BLPs))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Unreviewed new articles))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Unreviewed new articles created via the Article Wizard))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Unverifiable lists of persons))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Unverifiable lists of sporting persons))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Use American English))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Use Australian English))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Use Bangladeshi English))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Use British (Oxford) English))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Use British English))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Use Canadian English))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Use Harvard referencing))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Use Hong Kong English))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Use Indian English))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Use Irish English))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Use Jamaican English))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Use New Zealand English))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Use Pakistani English))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Use Scottish English))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Use Singapore English))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Use South African English))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Use dmy dates))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Use list-defined references))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Use mdy dates))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/User-created public domain files))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/User-created public domain files (no Commons)))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/User-created public domain images))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/User-created public domain images (no Commons)))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/User-created public domain images without user-name))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/User pages that include images for deletion))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Userspace drafts))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Userspace drafts created via the Article Wizard))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Vague or ambiguous geographic scope))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Vague or ambiguous time))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Wikipedia articles containing buzzwords))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Wikipedia articles in need of updating))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Wikipedia articles needing a junction list))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Wikipedia articles needing cleanup))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Wikipedia articles needing context))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Wikipedia articles needing copy edit))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Wikipedia articles needing factual verification))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Wikipedia articles needing page number citations))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Wikipedia articles needing reorganization))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Wikipedia articles needing rewrite))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Wikipedia articles that are too technical))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Wikipedia articles with citations needing edition))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Wikipedia articles with plot summary needing attention))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Wikipedia articles with possible conflicts of interest))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Wikipedia articles with style issues))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Wikipedia articles with undisclosed paid content))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Wikipedia articles without plot summaries))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Wikipedia categories needing cleanup))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Wikipedia external links cleanup))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Wikipedia introduction cleanup))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Wikipedia list cleanup))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Wikipedia pages needing cleanup))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Wikipedia spam cleanup))

  ((Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Wikipedia templates needing cleanup))

  which are all effectively blank (i.e., blank or simply transclude ((null))). Frietjes (talk) 15:23, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. There's now no consensus on whether the two templates should be merged. Galobtter (pingó mió) 06:32, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Infobox themed area (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) - 80 transclusions
• Template:Infobox amusement park (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) - 832 transclusions

Propose merging Template:Infobox themed area into Template:Infobox amusement park.

Very similar templates, with the "themed area" template appearing to be a subset of the 'amusement park' template, apart from |park=, which is labelled "Location" and is analogous to |location=. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:42, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge per nom. Better to have unified template. --Tom (LT) (talk) 10:35, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• My main concern about this merger proposal is that while, yes, an attraction is a subset of a park, an infobox will look at completely different things. Take Tomorrowland for example - it's inside of six different parks - the entire "rides" section of ((infobox amusement park)) is useless (because it is a "ride") and the majority of the main parameters would need to be duplicated to have the functionality. I'm not saying it cannot or should not be done, but when I started working on this merge yesterday I was essentially looking at just copying the "themed area" code and pasting it directly into "amusement park" with almost no changes other than numbering - in my experience that's not a good merge candidate. Primefac (talk) 15:23, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Could you give a different example? I've checked Tomorrowland which uses ((Infobox themed area)) and that template has a whole section for Attractions which is the same as the "Rides" section with an additional 2 other ride parameters not found in the park one. So if that was the only issue you found, it's currently already there. --Gonnym (talk) 12:20, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Adventureland (Disney), Mickey's Toontown, and just about every Disney attraction. I'll be honest, I didn't think about the fact that ((infobox themed area)) would actually have more content than ((infobox amusement park)); I understood the nomination to be "IB themed is merged into IB park", but as far as content goes it does look to be in the other direction. Primefac (talk) 15:33, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Since when did discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Holding cell mean TfD's get reopened? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:06, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Step 1 in the deletion review process is to discuss the close with the closing admin and see if they're willing to re-open. That happened, and they did. Primefac (talk) 15:33, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Okay, so I've looked this over again. In "themed area" there are options for putting in which park(s) the area is located, and how many "attractions" (i.e. coasters, rides, etc) there are inside that area. In "amusement park" there are options for all the standard location/owner/opened/closed/etc, as well as how many rides (i.e. coasters, rides, etc) are in the park itself.

I suppose one could argue that the "number of rides" section could be used for both, but otherwise it's just sticking two completely different templates together. I guess I don't necessarily disagree with doing this, but when two templates have about 5 params shared between them (out of about 30 for each) it doesn't make much sense (i.e. I'm not supporting or opposing, just doing the numbers). Primefac (talk) 04:22, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you merge you better make sure every article is proper. Otherwise. no. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 03:09, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That is generally how template mergers work. Primefac (talk) 15:08, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Oppose – As mentioned in another recent TfD discussion involving templates introduced by WikiProject Amusement Parks, it would be best to begin a discussion there (or at least provide a link to one) to discuss the proposal of these mergers in more detail. I am not fundamentally opposed to the idea of reducing unnecessary duplication, but to those that are not as experienced in maintaining templates, it would be great to see examples of how a resulting merger would work with valid testing beforehand. The original editors who were heavily involved in their creation are no longer active to my knowledge. Ahecht has provided some recent assistance to the project, so I'd like hear his/her thoughts on some of this as well. --GoneIn60 (talk) 15:03, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 February 6. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 18:56, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Infobox_Canton (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Infobox_Latvian_district (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Infobox_Maldives_atoll (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Infobox_Province_of_China_(PRC) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Infobox_region_of_Italy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Infobox_Ukrainian_oblast (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Infobox_Venezuelan_state (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Infobox_Vienna_District (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:45, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Buenos Aires (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Buenos Aires City landmarks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Neighbourhoods of Buenos Aires (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Buenos Aires City landmarks and Template:Neighbourhoods of Buenos Aires with Template:Buenos Aires.
Main ((Buenos Aires)) navbox is very sparsely populated, and there is some duplication of the neighborhoods. All would be better off under a single navbox. --woodensuperman 12:20, 19 December 2018 (UTC) [reply]

• Keep separate the templates proposed for merging are very big and I don't think putting them in a single super template will help assist navigation. There aren't space constraints here, and the current arrangement is fairly logical. So I think it is best to keep them separate.--Tom (LT) (talk) 00:22, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

They're not big though, ((Buenos Aires)) is practically empty, and the majority of the links in ((Neighbourhoods of Buenos Aires)) are in ((Buenos Aires City landmarks)) anyway. --woodensuperman 08:57, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose. Per Tom (LT). --Bsherr (talk) 01:59, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 January 5. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:06, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Uncategorized_stub (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).