The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 11:02, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Location map United Kingdom area code 020 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

redundant to using Module:Location map/data/Greater London with AlternativeMap set to 020 UK dial code area - 2007.png Frietjes (talk) 23:52, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Steven (Editor) (talk) 20:52, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox reality competition season. Not delete because new one was created only a few weeks ago (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 11:11, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Infobox television Survivor (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Infobox reality competition season (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Infobox television Survivor with Template:Infobox reality competition season.
Template:Infobox television Survivor has a few issues. It is a season template, yet it was incorrectly created as a wrapper of ((Infobox television)) instead of ((Infobox television season)). In addition, the fields the template needed, but were missing from the parent template, were added in a hack. The newly created Template:Infobox reality competition season has most of the fields except "Production location" (|location=), "Filming dates" (|filming_started= and |filming_completed=) (I've been informed these are actually included already in the season template) and "Picture format" (|picture_format=) which none of the television season articles use. So please comment if you think these fields should be merged or removed. Please note, if you think they should be merged, the current module setup will not enable it to be placed in the correct section and it would be better merged into ((Infobox television season)). Gonnym (talk) 22:25, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Plastikspork: who made the template into a wrapper in this November 2010 edit. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:19, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Replace and delete no need for separate templates here. --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:52, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Support With the creation of the custom module Template:Infobox reality competition season there really isn't a need for Template:Infobox television Survivor anymore. Here are some ideas for the missing parameters.
  • The |filming_started= and |filming_completed= parameters from Template:Infobox television Survivor can be replaced with the existing |film_start= and |film_end= parameters from Template:Infobox television season. (Template:Infobox reality competition season is a module of Template:Infobox television season and they must be used together.) For example WP:BIGBRO has made use of |film_start= and |film_end= parameters for seasons of Big Brother that are partially or wholly pre-recorded. An example of this can be seen at Celebrity Big Brother 1 (U.S.) where the contestants were being filmed seven days before the program began broadcasting on CBS. Survivor articles can easily use these parameters as well.
  • The module includes a |label1= and |data1= parameters for a custom field. This could potentially be used for Survivor articles to put "Production location" information. The other alternative could be adding a |location= to either Template:Infobox reality competition season or Template:Infobox television season but latter would need a consensus from WP:TV if I'm not mistaken.
  • I don't believe that picture format would be needed as that is typically covered by the parent article and the main infobox there. Alucard 16_{❯❯❯ chat?} 23:52, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• replace and delete, assuming that |location= is added to ((Infobox reality competition season)). I believe the location is important for this type of show, since it would be a much different show if it were filmed in a densely populated area. Frietjes (talk) 01:02, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Frietjes The template includes a custom label that Big Brother season articles use for different things. The Survivor season articles can use this for "Production location(s)" see this quick Survivor example I mocked up on how the infobox would look on Survivor articles so |location= wouldn't need to be added. The only change that I can see that would need to be made is a switch so "No. of contestants" would say "No. of castaways" on Survivor articles similar to how Big Brother articles it says "No. of Housemates" or "No. of Houseguests" depending on the version. Alucard 16_{❯❯❯ chat?} 02:32, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Support After doing a similar thing with Big Brother this will help provide consistency throughout the articles. TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:17, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:32, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Begin flag row (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Begin flag row/styles.css (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:End flag row (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

no longer used after changes to the parent templates Frietjes (talk) 21:22, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:52, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Steven (Editor) (talk) 20:53, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) ∯WBG^converse 11:52, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Db-author-notice-NPF (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I don't see any reason for this to be ever used.

After somebody has expressed an desire for any of his creations to be nuked; we don't have any reason to let him know about our internal bureaucratic procedures. The tagging is hardly of any value to him.

The sysop who chooses to delete the stuff might chose to note that he has fulfilled his request (along with the boilerplate message about avenues for restoration) and that will be helpful but that's outside the purview of this discussion.

If there's a consensus to delete; please don't delete this outright and ping me. This needs to be edited out of the PageTriageCSS; where it is present but hardly any used, as of now. ∯WBG^converse 19:59, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Well, if someone has requested for one of their own creations to be nuked, then yes, there's no need to let them know that it has been explicitly tagged for nuking. But there might be some ambiguity as to what constitutes such a request. Blanking a page, for example, is often taken to be such a deletion request, but that can't always be completely certain, and so it appears sensible to have an easy way to double-check by posting on the user's talk page. Also, there appear to be over 600 uses of this template on user talk pages [1]. – Uanfala (talk) 21:11, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Fair point. The same search sorted by last-edit-descending seems to indicate that it's used roughly around once a day. @Galobtter:-Can you take a peek through your goggles and let me know about when they were used? Any 10 at random, over the last month, ought to give fair clue:-) ∯WBG^converse 11:08, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  I checked 5, all were where the author blanked and someone else nominated for speedy deletion. Galobtter (pingó mió) 11:15, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 11:02, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Kik Tracee (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not enough links to warrant a navbox. None of their material has an article, just one member and a related band. --woodensuperman 15:52, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:52, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:38, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox character. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 11:00, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Infobox StarCraft character (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Infobox character (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Infobox StarCraft character with Template:Infobox character.
Template:Infobox video game character is being deleted per previous discussion which made this template redundant as two of its parameters are available in Template:Infobox character and the 3rd one can use one of the custom parameters. For 3 uses, this really isn't an issue. Gonnym (talk) 15:16, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Seems like this is a proposal to delete, after replacement, rather than merge. I support that. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:11, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• REplace and delete per nom. --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:52, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Support WP:INFOCOL Capankajsmilyo^{(Talk | Infobox assistance)} 00:16, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Support per nom. — 🌼📽️AnemoneProjectors💬 19:31, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox character. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 10:59, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Infobox Metal Gear character (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Infobox character (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Infobox Metal Gear character with Template:Infobox character.

Template:Infobox video game character is being deleted per previous discussion which made this template redundant as all parameters are available in Template:Infobox character. Gonnym (talk) 15:11, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Seems like this is a proposal to delete, after replacement, rather than merge. I support that. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:10, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Replace and delete per nom. --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:52, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Support WP:INFOCOL Capankajsmilyo^{(Talk | Infobox assistance)} 00:17, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Support per nom. — 🌼📽️AnemoneProjectors💬 19:31, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 10:57, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Women's Equality Party (UK) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Members of a political party are not suitable for navbox inclusion, as this places WP:UNDUE importance on their political membership. Once the "notable members" section is removed, this leaves just the founders and leader, which is just three links. WP:NENAN. Note that any other political party navbox in Category:United Kingdom political party templates does not list its membership, only its politicians. --woodensuperman 14:54, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. After members are removed, which I agree is UNDUE, the template contains too few links at this stage to warrant its existence. --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:52, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as above. Undue weight on members' membership, leaving insufficient content to require a navbox. Ralbegen (talk) 09:25, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 December 26. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 10:57, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Module:Cslist (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Module:List (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 December 26. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:09, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Iran_squad_2014_Asian_Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).