The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:12, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:IAM Cycling riders (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

redundant as the team is now defunct BaldBoris 19:11, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:12, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Tinkoff riders (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

redundant as the team is now defunct BaldBoris 19:09, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:12, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:AFL squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. The creator @Cashie initiated some brief discussion of it in 2011 at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Australian rules football/Archive_5#Squad_template, but I don't see any sign of further interest in it. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:10, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete redundant template, all AFL squads use ((Rls)) which is nearly exactly the same template. Flickerd (talk) 09:23, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:12, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Turriff United F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, with insufficient navigation. Contains links only to the head article Turriff United F.C., its ground, and the league in which it plays. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:56, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - not sure useful aid to navigation, the article's are all interlinked within the main body of the text. Hard to see that any season article would pass GNG and they would definitely fail NSEASONS so not sure what else could be added to this template. Fenix down (talk) 11:27, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 March 28 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:20, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Faith primary (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Religious text primary (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:20, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 26th ID (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Insufficient navigation. After the red links have been removed and articles on nn subjects redirected to alphabetical lists, only two blue-linked articles remain; pls see prior version.

Per the recent discussion (Redirect proposal for Knight's Cross winners), it's highly unlikely that the removed subjects would be considered notable in the future and the template is not needed. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:25, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox religious building. Convert to wrapper if necessary. Primefac (talk) 17:00, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Infobox Tibetan Buddhist monastery (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Infobox religious building (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Infobox Tibetan Buddhist monastery should be merged into Infobox religious building. Previous infoboxes of the same purpose were merged such as Template:Infobox Buddhist temple, Template:Infobox mosque, Template:Infobox Hindu temple. There are very few unique field. --Cs california (talk) 09:15, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose The Tibetan infobox is designed for a specific purpose. The colours are also very reflective of Tibetan Buddhism and it looks right. The Buddhisam infobox with the grey parameters looks horrible. I don't see the point in merging this for the sake of it. Leave it.Tibetan Prayer ^᧾ 12:51, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • User:Tibetan Prayer, the colours are controlled by the automatic colouring. the only ones that are grey are cases that aren't added to the list. do you have substantive objections? Frietjes (talk) 13:00, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• support converting ((Infobox Tibetan Buddhist monastery)) to a wrapper, as was done with Template:Infobox Hindu leader and Template:Infobox religious biography. one may need to use something like ((infobox name module)) to handle the name in alternative languages. Frietjes (talk) 13:03, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that would be fine Frietjes. As long as we retain the design and don't lose any info I don't mind.Tibetan Prayer ^᧾ 14:07, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I also agree with User:Tibetan Prayer as long as it retains all info it is fine--Cs california (talk) 02:07, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge, using a wrapper if desired. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:49, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge per above -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · ) 00:46, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).