The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:33, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cite Intel (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:03, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:37, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cite web/today (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:49, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:39, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Citebukhari (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:48, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Unused and should not be used per WP:ISLAMOR; such citations refer to hadiths. --HyperGaruda (talk) 11:37, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 September 18 ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:55, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cite nothing (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 September 19 ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 07:57, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Citeplaton (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) = 7 transclusions
• Template:Citeplato (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) = 11 transclusions

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 02:20, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Revelations about the plot (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:End of revelations about the plot (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Reimplementation of spoiler warnings. Currently only used in one sandbox page, but a hazard that shouldn't exist. David Gerard (talk) 19:20, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• delete per deletion of template:spoiler. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frietjes (talk • contribs) 17:18, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 02:18, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:South Alabama Jaguars bowl game navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

NAVBOX with just one link. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:15, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• delete/replace per this discussion. Frietjes (talk) 17:17, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 00:29, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:The Gadget Show (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No cast and crew in navboxes per longstanding consensus. All other links are just repeated or tangential. Rob Sinden (talk) 08:57, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, mostly cast and crew. Frietjes (talk) 17:16, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Navboxes shouldn't include cast and crew. I also think they shouldn't include locations or production companies (or record labels, TV channels, radio stations, etc) as if every TV show had its location/production company included in the navbox, articles about those places and companies would be overrun with unrelated templates. Removing all these leaves the template with one article, defeating the purpose of the template. anemoneprojectors 14:51, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).