The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 04:16, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Ritchie Valens (album) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unnecessary template as it does not improve upon the navigation of the main template ((Ritchie Valens)). Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 22:06, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, duplicate navigation. Frietjes (talk) 13:48, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as a duplicate. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:31, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Taxon template already exists, and was created first. No need to rename/redirect. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 04:21, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Taxonomy/Atlantic Puffin (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Misnamed (we use the taxon names, not the English names), now orphaned. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 21:43, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support Rename' per nom. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 02:55, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Taxon template already exists, and was created first. No need to rename/redirect. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 04:21, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Taxonomy/Baleen whale (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Misnamed (we use the scientific name, not the English one, for these templates) and orphaned. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 20:14, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support Rename per nom. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 02:56, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 October 8 (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 01:08, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Delta State Statesmen football navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 October 8 (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 01:08, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cite DVD notes (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) - 440 transclusions
• Template:Cite AV media notes (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) - 11,203 transclusions

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 00:07, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Winnipeg City Council (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete; no longer necessary. Consensus formerly allowed Winnipeg's municipal councillors to be considered notable under WP:NPOL, so most city councillors had articles and this template was created to link them. However, that consensus has now been deprecated and the councillors are not considered to pass NPOL anymore, so this template is now serving just to link the mayor and one city councillor whose article cites enough references to survive a "passes GNG anyway" claim. But we don't need a navbox to link just two pages to each other. Bearcat (talk) 07:01, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- no NPOL, no template :-) K.e.coffman (talk) 06:32, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 October 8 (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 01:08, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:(pf)-meta (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Keep (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 00:06, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Infobox Russian city district (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only used in one article. Jc86035 (talk) Use ((re|Jc86035))
to reply to me 10:51, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as an unnecessary wrapper of ((Infobox Russian district)) (itself redundant, most likely to ((Infobox settlement))). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:53, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, per arguments covered in the previous TfD. Thank you for reminding that it is only used in one article, though—it seems it slipped Andy's mind to clean up after himself after the template had been retained last time.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); September 8, 2016; 13:17 (UTC)

  @Ezhiki: I'm not entirely convinced, given that this wrapper has one predefined parameter (|type=CD). Everything else is just passed through unmodified to ((Infobox Russian district)). What's the point? Jc86035 (talk) Use ((re|Jc86035))
  to reply to me 13:43, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  You are right about the wrapper using just one predefined parameter, but the main point of the template is to prevent displaying the values in the fields which are inapplicable to city districts (but are applicable to administrative/municipal districts of the federal subjects). There is a whole lot of stuff in the regular district template which should not be shown if it is accidentally filled out for a city district (this happened before and, indeed, is what prompted the creation of the wrapper). That predefined parameter serves as a switch. An alternative is to hardcode that switch into the regular template for each individual parameter inapplicable to city districts, but from the coding point of view it doesn't sound like a good idea—it's pretty messy and a nightmare to maintain. (And as an aside, as far as usage goes, there are currently 305 city districts in Russia, all of which should have articles but only a handful currently do). Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); September 8, 2016; 13:58 (UTC)

• Keep, agree with Ezhiki--Ymblanter (talk) 15:48, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Pigsonthewing. It is not necessary to create a wrapper template to prevent certain parameters from being passed. Just don't pass them to the broader template. They do not need to be forced to have no effect. Pppery 12:22, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Per Ezhiki, who always knows his stuff. Debresser (talk) 21:39, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Ymblanter' and Ezhiki's arguments in the previous TfD. Uanfala (talk) 13:21, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep agree with Ymblanter's, Ezhiki's, and Uanfala's arguments in the previous TfD. Wisnu Aji (talk) 09:44, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 00:05, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:The International (golf) Tournaments (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox with just one link and that article is at AFD. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 01:30, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. Tewapack (talk) 04:58, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. Nigej (talk) 19:46, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- unneeded. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:33, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).