The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:08, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:TRS (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only two transclusions in articles one transclusion in an article; can be replaced by ((HK-MTR stations)). (No performance issues with large number of transclusions of latter since it uses a module.) Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use ((re|Jc86035)) to reply to me 14:28, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No objection. Useddenim (talk) 16:47, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:18, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Blue Coast Records (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Record label catalogues and artist roster unsuitable for navbox inclusion per consensus at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 September 28#Record label templates. Rob Sinden (talk) 14:18, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• delete per precedent. Frietjes (talk) 15:47, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:18, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Northern Spy Records (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Record label catalogues and artist roster unsuitable for navbox inclusion per consensus at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 September 28#Record label templates. Rob Sinden (talk) 14:12, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• delete per precedent. Frietjes (talk) 15:47, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:18, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Mello Music Group (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Record label catalogues and artist roster unsuitable for navbox inclusion per consensus at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 September 28#Record label templates. Rob Sinden (talk) 14:04, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• delete per precedent. Frietjes (talk) 15:47, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:18, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Never Say Die Records (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Record label catalogues and artist roster unsuitable for navbox inclusion per consensus at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 September 28#Record label templates. Rob Sinden (talk) 14:02, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• delete per precedent. Frietjes (talk) 15:47, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:24, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Pearl International Film Festival (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not enough links to provide useful navigation. Rob Sinden (talk) 13:36, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• delete only connects two articles. Frietjes (talk) 15:48, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:14, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Fall for Dance (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox consists solely of external links, which are not allowed in navboxes. Rob Sinden (talk) 13:33, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• delete per precedent, provides no navigation. Frietjes (talk) 15:48, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:14, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cavity Search Records (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Record label catalogues and artist roster unsuitable for navbox inclusion per consensus at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 September 28#Record label templates. Rob Sinden (talk) 11:53, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• delete per precedent. Frietjes (talk) 15:48, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:14, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Suicide Squeeze Records (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Record label catalogues and artist roster unsuitable for navbox inclusion per consensus at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 September 28#Record label templates. Rob Sinden (talk) 11:49, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• delete per precedent. Frietjes (talk) 15:48, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:19, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Festivals by type (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Useless. Most of the links point to sections of the same articles. Rob Sinden (talk) 11:35, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, only connects three articles, so just use standard 'see also' linking. Frietjes (talk) 15:49, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:14, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Alive Naturalsound Records (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Record label catalogues and artist roster unsuitable for navbox inclusion per consensus at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 September 28#Record label templates. Rob Sinden (talk) 11:28, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• delete per precedent. Frietjes (talk) 15:49, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was  Request withdrawn I think I know how to handle this. Ping if there are any issues/questions. (non-admin closure) — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 18:16, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Accountcreator topicon1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Accountcreator topicon1/doc (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Completely identical to ((Accountcreator topicon)). Used only at User:BranStark/Navigation. Suggest replace and delete per WP:T3 — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 05:24, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well I guess the only difference is the |wikilink=. The link for ((Accountcreator topicon1)) to Wikipedia:Account creator might actually make more sense. I might update Accountcreator topicon to match. — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 05:28, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Updated. — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 05:31, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:12, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Highways in Hamilton County, New York (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Highways in Essex County, New York (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

As per precedent here, this is better handled with a category. ~ Rob^Talk 01:24, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per precedent, but would be interested in hearing the creator's remarks. — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 05:35, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete—per precedent. Imzadi 1979 → 08:20, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• delete per precedent. Frietjes (talk) 15:49, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Per precedent. Dough4872 22:01, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus but any editor is welcome to rewrite one template to accomodate the other, write the second as a wrapper, and then renominate. The general consensus is that this shouldn't be listed at WP:TFD/H (which effectively pushes off this work to another volunteer), but there's no opposition to PanchoS or another editor completing this merge. (non-admin closure) ~ Rob^Talk 16:28, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Category in year (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Year by category (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Category in year with Template:Year by category.
As stated by the creator, this is just a fork of Template:Year by category with the major difference that the categories' generic name is prepended as in Category:Animals described in 2005 rather than appended as in Category:2005 in the United States. This subtle variation should be rather easy to incorporate into Template:Year by category, though the |cat= parameter would need to be renamed to |suffix= or |post=, to accommodate a new |prefix= or |pre= parameter. PanchoS (talk) 16:25, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose – Looks like an intellectually interesting exercise but I don't see any benefit of this change. How would we justify the massive effort of converting all existing usage to the new proposed syntax? — JFG ^talk 05:31, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• rewrite as a wrapper. Frietjes (talk) 19:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• I think the function of these two templates is different enough to warrant them being separate. If a user wants to volunteer to do the rewrite though, then close as rewrite. But I'm suggesting a close as not merged. — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 05:33, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).