The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Madagascar/meta/color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused Frietjes (talk) 22:06, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per Frietjes nomination. --Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:40, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Aircraft-jet-mil (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not used and horrendous. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 06:24, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: This template has long been superceded by other ways of presenting aircraft specifications.Nigel Ish (talk) 14:17, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, no longer needed. Frietjes (talk) 19:03, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:36, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Avicii songs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Avicii (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Avicii songs with Template:Avicii.
Merge templates Avicii songs into Avicii, since it wouldn't be appropriate for the songs to get a separate template. - TheMagnificentist (talk) 06:13, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• merge, seems sensible to avoid duplication. Frietjes (talk) 14:09, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:47, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:United States Army (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This isn't used and is apparently "kept for historical reference only" (see the code). No idea why it should be kept. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 06:04, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, looks like it was replaced with this edit. I don't see any reason for keeping it around. Frietjes (talk) 19:30, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:46, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Zootopia (franchise) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I fail to see the purpose of this template. There are only 4 links on it; the main movie, the song "Try Everything" (which can be adequately mentioned in the main article, both for itself and Zootopia), and the other two are related to Disney as a whole, not just Zootopia. The rest are redlinks, and I doubt any of them will get created, or if they are, will probably just redirect back to the main Zootopia page. JudgeRM (talk to me) 03:42, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, the articles are already well-connected. Frietjes (talk) 19:31, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:36, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cc-by-sa-2.0-uk (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused copyright tag, replaceable by ((Cc-by-sa-2.0)) FASTILY 03:13, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, unused. Frietjes (talk) 19:02, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:35, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Infobox property (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Everything about this template is bizarre. It is only really used on one page and no other property has an infobox like this. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 02:18, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This infobox uses several non-standard unit symbols. I would gladly see it deleted. If it stays, these errors should be fixed (or the use of non-standard symbols explained). Dondervogel 2 (talk) 15:54, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, looks like a formatting experiment that never caught on. Frietjes (talk) 14:07, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).