The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. (nac) Alakzi (talk) 09:21, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Football in the Falkland Islands (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only three blue links, one of which is a redirect to a link already in the navbox. Not currently a useful aid to navigation.Given that most if not all of the redlinks would not pass WP:NFOOTY or WP:FOOTYN it is unlikely this could become a useful aid to navigation in the future. Fenix down (talk) 14:04, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as failing WP:NAVBOX. --torri²(^talk/_contribs) 21:54, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. (nac) Alakzi (talk) 09:24, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Hofmannsthal operas (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Rob Sinden (talk) 13:53, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not needed any longer. --Meister und Margarita (talk) 21:38, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. (nac) Alakzi (talk) 20:54, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:NERIT (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Short-lived, were replaced by ERT. John123521 (Talk-Contib.) RA 08:20, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) BethNaught (talk) 08:39, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:1933 Kentucky Wildcats men's basketball navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unlike NCAA tournament championships, the validity of Helms Athletic Foundation championships in basketball is highly disputed. Additionally, only players who meet WP:GNG appear on college championship templates, and for players of this (pre-1939) era, the level of press coverage for college basketball was significantly lower than today. Though stars may meet GNG, most players on the team would not, and some Helms champions might literally only have one player meeting this threshold. Over-templatization. Rikster2 (talk) 00:20, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. I would like to add that sometimes there were multiple national champions named in the same season in many of the pre-NCAA Tournament years (such as Premo-Porretta Power Poll national champions), and the only defining characteristic of the set of these national championship templates is champions of the NCAA Tournament. FWIW in this nomination, the user who created the navbox has created hundreds of non-notable "champions" and "participant" team navboxes for non-prestigious sports tournaments... while not a criterion for deletion nomination in this case, I think it is a fact worth mentioning to help judge this nomination on the whole. Jrcla2 (talk) 01:09, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Agree with all of the rationale in the nom and Jrcla's addition. SCMatt33 (talk) 19:41, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) BethNaught (talk) 08:39, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:1932 Purdue Boilermakers men's basketball navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unlike NCAA tournament championships, the validity of Helms Athletic Foundation championships in basketball is highly disputed. Additionally, only players who meet WP:GNG appear on college championship templates, and for players of this (pre-1939) era, the level of press coverage for college basketball was significantly lower than today. Though stars may meet GNG, most players on the team would not, and some Helms champions might literally only have one player meeting this threshold. Over-templatization. Rikster2 (talk) 00:25, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. I would like to add that sometimes there were multiple national champions named in the same season in many of the pre-NCAA Tournament years (such as Premo-Porretta Power Poll national champions), and the only defining characteristic of the set of these national championship templates is champions of the NCAA Tournament. FWIW in this nomination, the user who created the navbox has created hundreds of non-notable "champions" and "participant" team navboxes for non-prestigious sports tournaments... while not a criterion for deletion nomination in this case, I think it is a fact worth mentioning to help judge this nomination on the whole. Jrcla2 (talk) 01:09, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Agree with all of the rationale in the nom and Jrcla's addition. SCMatt33 (talk) 19:41, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.