October 21
Template:WomenLowKickKickboxingAtWAKOBelgrade
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:04, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Template:WomenLowKickKickboxingAtWAKOBelgrade (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
unused. Frietjes (talk) 16:23, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:WomenFullContactKickboxingAt2007WAKOCoimbra
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:04, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Template:WomenFullContactKickboxingAt2007WAKOCoimbra (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
unused. Frietjes (talk) 16:20, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as unused with mostly redlinks —PC-XT+ 04:19, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Template a540
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:04, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Template:Template a540 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
unused. Frietjes (talk) 16:18, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn. Petr Matas 13:00, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Template:Link if not current (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:No selflink (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:Link if not current with Template:No selflink.
These templates do the same thing. Petr Matas 03:19, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- As far as I understand, they don't do the same thing. The latter converts the link to a simple text; the former deletes the whole line. However, I believe it's possible to merge them and define the behavior using a parameter. Vcohen (talk) 07:31, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I see. In that case I would prefer to keep them as they are. I have also updated the documentation. Petr Matas 10:43, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Are you going to remove the calls to ((Tfm))? Vcohen (talk) 12:21, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes. Petr Matas 13:00, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- P.S. Excuse me... The latter seems to be totally redundant, as it does exactly the same thing a usual link does. Note that it is not in use at all. Vcohen (talk) 07:37, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- A self link is normally bold. This template avoids it. Petr Matas 10:43, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- You are right, thank you. Vcohen (talk) 12:00, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Wikipedia Signpost/Quote