June 6
Template:Wisely Series
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:33, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Template:Wisely Series (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
unused. Frietjes (talk) 23:25, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:WinLossPct8
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Feel free to merge the functionality with another template, if the functionality is needed. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:32, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Template:WinLossPct8 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
unused. Frietjes (talk) 23:23, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment it could be merged with ((WinLossPct8Color)) no? Thus having the option of coloration or not as a parameter. (though the purpose for both these two templates is to replicate the functionality of ((WinLossPct)) ) -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 06:03, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Wounded Warrior Project/IRS form 990 table
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:32, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Template:Wounded Warrior Project/IRS form 990 table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
unused. Frietjes (talk) 23:22, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:New South Wales Waratahs
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete, unused and no objections. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:34, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Template:New South Wales Waratahs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:NSW Waratahs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
This navbox and associated redirection page, lists mostly via redlinks topics that either do not have sufficient notability to warrant separate articles as per (WP:NOTIFS) and are covered in the main article, or already prominently linked via navboxes or infoboxes in the main article. The page seems to have been previously earmarked for deletion by consensus, and recreated. Kiap (talk) 20:20, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:List of palms of the Caribbeans
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:31, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Template:List of palms of the Caribbeans (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
I replaced it in List of palms native to the Caribbean, so it is no longer needed. Frietjes (talk) 17:31, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Cite doi/10.5665.2Fsleep.1378
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 June 25 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:35, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Ashburner 2005
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:30, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Template:Ashburner 2005 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
With this edit, it is now orphaned. I note that the url link is dead but that would be impossible to figure out how to fix (namely searching for a reference, then figuring out the template and then fixing the template) for new users. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:31, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Australian Trilobite References
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 June 25 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:37, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Citation accessible stations FGC
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:29, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Template:Citation accessible stations FGC (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Orphaned unused template. It could be kept as a subst template but I don't see it being needed to keep. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:13, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.