The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:23, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox breath mint (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose Deletion. Unused and unlikely to be used. This template is way too single-use, and most articles about specific brands of breath mints would probably live on the page of their company. vgmddg (look | talk | do) 00:05, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete no way is this going to get much use. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 02:12, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Mhiji (talk) 03:03, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, nice ;) Rehman 11:05, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unused and seems pretty useless to me. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 16:42, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Merged. WOSlinker (talk) 13:24, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Australian winery (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Infobox winery (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Infobox Australian winery with Template:Infobox winery.
Additional params in Infobox Australian winery could easily be added to Infobox winery. WOSlinker (talk) 21:16, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I created this template. I have no objection to the merge provided the additional parameters are added to the general winery infobox. --Bduke (Discussion) 21:40, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've now added all the extra params into Infobox winery. -- WOSlinker (talk) 13:18, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge per nom. Mhiji (talk) 22:47, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy merge, per the creator of the template. Rehman 11:06, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Merged. Rehman 13:20, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox economy 1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Infobox economy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Infobox economy 1 with Template:Infobox economy.
Fork of Infobox economy template. With just average gross salary and average net salary params added. WOSlinker (talk) 21:10, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge per nom. Mhiji (talk) 22:53, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, completed the merge (and converted to redirect). Rehman 11:16, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:28, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Botstatus (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary template. Mhiji (talk) 05:06, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, per nom. Rehman 11:36, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unused and unnecessary. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 16:44, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:28, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:108 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary navbox. Mhiji (talk) 04:33, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, per nom. Rehman 11:37, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Unused and unnecessary. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 16:45, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:35, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:)( (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary template. Mhiji (talk) 04:26, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, absolutely useless. Rehman 11:38, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 02:13, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Hardy Boys character (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only 2 transclusions. Nothing ((Infobox character)) can't handle. Magioladitis (talk) 01:30, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: 134.253.26.6 (talk) has been going through and orphaning all of these series character infoboxes as a result of the recent attempt to mass delete all other infobox except for ((Infobox character)). These actions may affect the outcomes of this and future nominations of character infobox templates. —Farix (t | c) 03:29, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  Yes, I have been orphaning many of these, but this isn't one of them. If I had, it would have zero transclusions :) In any event, I don't think it is that controversial in this case. 134.253.26.12 (talk) 16:10, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: I created this template before there was Infobox character and when there was a lot more individual HB character articles. But there doesn't really seem much point in it anymore. WHLfan (talk) 03:37, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Mhiji (talk) 04:31, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete, per G7. Rehman 11:39, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:28, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Entourage character (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphan template. ((Infobox character)) does the job better. This one has some entries like "age" and "lovelife" which strongly depend on "current" episode and go against WP:FICTION. Magioladitis (talk) 01:28, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: 134.253.26.6 (talk) has been going through and orphaning all of these series character infoboxes as a result of the recent attempt to mass delete all other infobox except for ((Infobox character)). These actions may affect the outcomes of this and future nominations of character infobox templates. —Farix (t | c) 03:29, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  Yes, thank you for noting this. I have been making changes like this. However, I don't think it is that controversial here, since the core information is being preserved. 134.253.26.12 (talk) 16:05, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  As per below, and looking at the above - "Speedy" is not a valid reason here. - J Greb (talk) 04:04, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Mhiji (talk) 04:31, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, per nom. Rehman 11:40, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:31, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Xanth character (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphan infobox. Almost all entries are covered by ((Infobox character)). Magioladitis (talk) 01:24, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: 134.253.26.6 (talk) has been going through and orphaning all of these series character infoboxes as a result of the recent attempt to mass delete all other infobox except for ((Infobox character)). These actions may affect the outcomes of this and future nominations of character infobox templates. —Farix (t | c) 03:29, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  Yes, thank you for noting this. The mass deletion was a mistake, in my opinion, but there are several on the list which should be less controversial, and this is one of them. Note that, this is an example of one of my edits. As you can see, no critical information is being discarded. 134.253.26.12 (talk) 16:08, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  Actually, that act streatchs WP:AGF almost to breaking since it was at the same time the infobox was put up as a mass delietion nom. Once a template is nominated it should be left in place untile the TfD closes or is withdrawn. The template may very well have been deleted/redirected/converted to using Infobox character as a meta-template, but the editors commenting should have a chance to see how widely the template is used and exactly how its use differs from Infobox character. In that light the IP may want to undo the damage done/bias created so others can see how the template was used. - J Greb (talk) 04:03, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  The IP provided a link to the single edit that orphaned the template, as far as I can tell from checking edit history. I agree that it would have been better to wait until the prior TFD had closed. Anyone should feel free to roll back the edit per WP:BRD. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 07:28, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Mhiji (talk) 04:31, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, per nom. Rehman 11:40, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.