The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Speedy deleted by SatyrTN. — Gavia immer (talk) 14:35, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:KMLEref (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Spam template of 3rd party medical dictionary sites. 17+ spam account assotiated with this campaign. see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam#kmle.com Speedy Delete — Hu12 (talk) 20:22, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Reviewing the contribs of the account, everything the nom says is true. Nousernamesleft^{copper, not wood} 21:59, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete and tagged as such. JPG-GR (talk) 00:32, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete. I have removed all transcluded instances of this template. --A. B. ^(talk) 01:04, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:51, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ja-0 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Unused, orphaned template that isn't part of a series. (There are no Template:Ja-1, etc.) --MZMcBride (talk) 17:38, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure there is (((User ja-0))). It simply want carried with the other members of the series. I do not understand why are you rushing to get this deleted. I just removed a speedy delete template today. If it being or not being on a series is the issue a simple redirecting will fix it. Per GFDL this should not be deleted unless histories are merged. I have redirected it to avoid the hassle. -- Cat ^chi? 17:44, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

GFDL concerns? There was one edit to the template, and the content there doesn't match the version it was redirected to. Now you've simply created an unused template redirect. Why? --MZMcBride (talk) 18:18, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aren't unused, unlikely-to-be-used redirects subject to speedy deletion? Nousernamesleft^{copper, not wood} 22:00, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, unused redirect. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{round of applause} 23:03, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, unused and unnecessary redirect. Happy‑melon 22:22, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:52, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Kiev Subdivision (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Delete. Limited use template. The ten pages using this template have been standardized to Infobox Settlement. —MJCdetroit ^(yak) 00:57, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as deprecated. JPG-GR (talk) 01:26, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. MJC, you're taking apart all the infoboxes that I started.. :) It's doesn't matter though, ((Infobox Settlement)) is much more flexible and better for use.. —dima/talk/ 05:13, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. - Darwinek (talk) 12:19, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete, per WP:CSD#T3... after this has closed... :D Happy‑melon 22:22, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.