The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete // Pilotguy (Have your say) 13:42, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Template major spanish cities (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Delete Unused and redundant to Template:Spanish city. It is also set up as a single use template for Madrid, which already uses the more apt ((Spanish city)) Bob 16:45, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom —MJCdetroit 20:15, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete // Pilotguy (Have your say) 13:42, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Alsace infobox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Template:French Guiana infobox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Delete Unused and redundant. The relevant articles use Template:Infobox French Région. -- Bob 16:45, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom —MJCdetroit 20:15, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete // Pilotguy (Have your say) 13:42, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Alex Jones (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Three articles do not merit a navbar, nor does Alex Jones provide enough notability on his own to support a series of related articles on him.--Rosicrucian 15:05, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom--Peephole 15:10, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete template is completely unnecessary. --Aude (talk contribs as tagcloud) 16:45, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. If there's only three articles in the entire navbar, it's just an excuse to put the topic's name in a bigger font. Where I come from, we call that "advertising". --Aaron 16:53, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, veiled advert, not enough articles to be worthy of a template. Sandy 19:19, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom GabrielF 19:21, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, useless. Christopher Parham (talk) 23:42, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. Crockspot 13:16, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, since three of the articles on Jones failed to survive AFD. Calwatch 20:45, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- alas, it once made sense, but due to an aggressive bunch of cruft-deleters, Alex now rates below Oprah in notability. Morton devonshire 01:51, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • So cruel that it can't follow the real world, where "Alex Jones" is known to millions of people and people are saying "Oprah who?" -- Antaeus Feldspar 13:30, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Aaron. CWC(talk) 07:19, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unneeded. Pascal.Tesson 18:29, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as the War on Cruft continues --Tbeatty 22:24, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no longer needed. Tom Harrison ^Talk 00:33, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Due to AfD, template is now down to two articles rather than three.--Rosicrucian 17:45, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.