The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:MortonStalker[edit]

Suspected sock puppeteer

MortonStalker (talk⁺ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)

Suspected sock puppets

• fronsdorf (talk⁺ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)

Report submission by

• Jeff79 (talk) 07:15, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence

• As for puppeteer and puppet, I have no idea which way around it is. I think it's entirely possible that another user is controlling one or both of these. Anyway, a poll was started on the wikiproject for rugby league talk page and when consensus for opposition was building both of these accounts were re-activated, apparently to skew consensus. Looking at the recent edit histories, the patterns (like their points of view) are quite similar. Lately both seem to be concerned exclusively with that vote and images of Super League players. I have concerns about sock puppetry and meat puppetry from other users in that poll. One of them may have created both of the accounts listed here. Perhaps IP checks? This is my first sock puppetry episode, hope I've not done it all wrong.--Jeff79 (talk) 07:15, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• Please remember to notify all accounts listed as possibly linked to the sock puppetry in question (instructions).
• I am not Fronsdorf, nor do I have any connection to this person. MortonStalker (talk) 18:55, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Sorry I am being called a sockpuppet of a stalker because I found the pictures were too big. Where do I go from here. Fronsdorf (talk) 20:16, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions

I'm afraid it does rather look like the two accounts are being operated by the same person, but given the denial I would suggest taking it to WP:RFCU to find out for sure. _Gb^T/c 17:51, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CU inconclusive. — Rlevse • Talk • 01:45, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]