The result of the discussion was Upmerge to Category:Chile_geography_stubs. Ruslik_Zero 11:15, 30 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Undersized. Delete category, upmerge template, with no prejudice against recreating category once sufficient articles tagged. Dawynn (talk) 18:27, 28 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 16:23, 3 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
While reviewing templates to vet, I found this. See original discussion. According to the original discussion, this was strongly opposed. My feeling is to delete based on the original discussion. Feel free to discuss again. Dawynn (talk) 12:41, 28 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The result of the discussion was Upmerge to Cat:Ray-finned fish stubs. Ruslik_Zero 18:46, 31 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Undersized. Delete category, upmerge template. No prejudice against recreating category once sufficient articles tagged. Dawynn (talk) 12:20, 28 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The result of the discussion was Upmerge. Ruslik_Zero 18:32, 31 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Premature category. Permcat is still pretty small. Propose deleting category, upmerging template. No prejudice against recreating category once sufficient articles tagged. Dawynn (talk) 12:16, 28 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The result of the discussion was Upmerge. Ruslik_Zero 18:34, 31 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Empty permcat. Propose deleting category, upmerging template. No prejudice against recreating category once sufficient articles tagged. Dawynn (talk) 12:16, 28 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The result of the discussion was Upmerge to Category:Aromatic compound stubs. Ruslik_Zero 11:12, 30 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Seems to me that the permcat had more articles previously. Perhaps these are called something else now? Either way, both permcat and stub cat are seriously undersized. Delete category and upmerge template until sufficient articles found. Dawynn (talk) 11:08, 28 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The result of the discussion was Upmerge to Cat:Aircraft stubs until the necessary number of stubs exists. Ruslik_Zero 18:40, 31 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Premature. Propose delete, with no prejudice against recreation once template reaches limit. Dawynn (talk) 11:04, 28 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The result of the discussion was Upmerge as underpopulated. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:15, 9 January 2012 (UTC) – עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:15, 9 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Premature. Propose delete, with no prejudice against recreation once template reaches limit. Permcat only has about 12 non-alumni articles. Dawynn (talk) 11:03, 28 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The result of the discussion was Rename ((mathapplied-stub)) to ((applied-math-stub)). Keep/No consensus for three others. Ruslik_Zero 16:19, 3 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
At Proposals, it became clear that we use a few different stems for mathematics templates. The main one is at -math- so I propose to rename the following, leaving redirects:
SeveroTC 09:31, 28 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
((Analysis-math-stub))
((Logic-math-stub))
((Lit-math-stub))
The result of the discussion was Delete both. Ruslik_Zero 11:06, 30 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Unused, unproposed, malformed. And considering that we already have a well-populated ((HongKong-film-stub)) / Cat:Hong Kong film stubs, I don't see why we would want a "Cinema" category also. What differentiates these categories? Dawynn (talk) 04:17, 28 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The result of the discussion was Delete and rename per nom. Ruslik_Zero 18:48, 24 January 2012 (UTC) – Ruslik_Zero 18:48, 24 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Dawynn (talk) 04:21, 28 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The result of the discussion was Redirect to ((actor-model-stub)). עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:34, 5 January 2012 (UTC) – עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:34, 5 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Currently, ((actress-stub)) is a redirect to ((actor-stub)). Propose the same be done here. Keep ((actress-model-stub)), but make it redirect to ((actor-model-stub)). Dawynn (talk) 04:30, 28 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The result of the discussion was Keep. Ruslik_Zero 11:21, 30 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I see that this was officially approved, along with Cat:Queensland island stubs (which has not been created yet). I thought we had a long-standing policy of not breaking geography categories down by such structures. (A category for dams was also approved, but I think these are OK, classified under "buildings and structures"). Dawynn (talk) 04:39, 28 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]