- SpidErxD (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
04 March 2017
Suspected sockpuppets
SpidErxD claims Al Arabiya not reliable because "Saudi Royal family owns it"[1],
KnowledgeForEvery1 claims Al Arabiya not reliable because "Saudi Royal family owns it" [2]
Both of these accounts previously acted as tag-team on Economy of Iran. Kuioooooo (talk) 18:59, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- First of all I didn't said anything regarding Al-Arabiya. Kuioooooo (talk · contribs · count) is lying. I said "Asharq Al-Awsat newspaper is founded by Saudi Royal family. maybe we should use less bias source while editing Iranian articles instead of using Saudi Arabian newspaper?" That's what I said. Secondly I don't know anything about these users. User:Strivingsoul or User:Ayene2020 or User:Boeing7877. KnowledgeForEvery1 (talk) 07:09, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I blocked and tagged Kuioooooo (talk · contribs · count) as a sock of Mangoeater1000 (talk · contribs · count). The evidence presented in this case against the alleged master and KnowledgeForEvery1 is thin. There has been no evidence presented against the other three accounts.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:32, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The two quotes that are supposedly identical are completely inaccurate. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:52, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]