same pattern of vandalism only activity, as user:Double Uncle Spit Roast Generator exhibited yesterday, both show quite a bit of knowledge of wikipedia procedures, especially for newbies Wuhwuzdat (talk) 17:39, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
I checked my contributions and his contribrutions.However he never purposed a article to become a policy or guideline.Your evidence is flawed. Pickbothmanlol (talk) 17:48, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
And his block log states the words "account creation blocked" with the date of 13 Febuary 2009. I am not him and memberly close this case. Pickbothmanlol (talk) 17:50, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Is this all you have on me? Just assume good faith and accpect the fact that I am not a sockpuppet.Pickbothmanlol (talk)
This user behavior is consistant with accused sock behavior. Checkuser will confirm. Garycompugeek (talk) 18:09, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
Synergy 16:53, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
IP says all
Additional information needed: Please provide a code letter. SPCUClerkbot (talk) 02:12, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
One IP range blocked. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 04:37, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
Mayalld (talk) 07:49, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
SNESCDADDON has expanded on the guideline page Wikipedia:Casual, created by confirmed puppeteer Pickbothmanlol. He and NUsedBot also vandalized Template:Wikipedia ads. Creation of NUsedBot was claimed by AltecCrog (talk · contribs), a confirmed puppet of Pickbothmanlol. SNESCDADDON's first edits were to vote at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel Warady and Joel Warady Group, indicating he was familiar with ongoing controversy. Also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/72.54.210.49, indicating he understands sockpuppet policy. NUsedBot is already blocked for a violation of bot policy. Requesting CU because these accounts were created to evade the indefinite block on the original account. Wronkiew (talk) 01:02, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
Nothing to see here folks. Foxy Loxy Pounce! 09:56, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
The new user AltecLansing12 (talk · contribs) has made edits to pages such as User:SPCUClerkbot/moreinfo-RFCU, which have previously been vandalised by A1a6s (talk · contribs) who is a sock of Pickbothmanlol (talk · contribs). The user has also attempted to disrupt a bot with this edit: [1], and has created User:AltecLansing12/Casual which is almost identical to User:Pickbothmanlol/Casual. Other similarities are an interest in User:Grawp[2][3], and User:Ananny[4][5], and a similar username to AltecCrog (talk · contribs) who is already blocked as a suspected sock of User:Pickbothmanlol. —Snigbrook 19:52, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
I am a sockpuppet but the edits on this account arent all completely vandalism.I did tag some articles that had no content or were just plain nonsense that can hint good faith but yes I am afraid I have to admit I am a sock. AltecLansing12 (talk) 20:05, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Obvious sock - WP:DUCK. Now blocked with an expiry time of indefinite. --Kanonkas : Talk 20:08, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
This user's relation to Grawp can be found in the history of Dsaasdasdboz's contributions and deleted contribrutions but I doubt that account is a true sock of Grawp.
Clerk note: given the history of this sockmaster disrupting SPI, I suspect that the reporter may be worth a look as a sock! Mayalld (talk) 16:23, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
Completed already blocked as a sock. Mayalld (talk) 14:46, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
Mayalld (talk) 14:46, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Interest in User:Kralizec! by both 75.175.233.227 and Petunia465, second edit by Petunia465 was to User talk:75.175.233.227. Both Schoolblock and Petunia465 have attempted to disrupt WP:UAA by posting already blocked usernames. Petunia465 is probably not the original puppeteer, but I've run out of time tonight to investigate this. Wronkiew (talk) 06:28, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
Clerk endorsed to check for potential link to Pickbothmanlol (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki), and if related to look for a potential range for hardblock. Mayalld (talk) 10:42, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
Both use similar stylesheets to vandalize multiple wikis including this one.
Completed the usual helpful Pickbothmanlol, vandalising SPI templates,then reporting himself. Mayalld (talk) 09:36, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
Mayalld (talk) 09:36, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Self reporting with no questions asked -- User:PickYourLeader14 23:10, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
Self-reporting because this account is going to deal with Simple Wikipedia instead of this Wikipedia.
![]() |
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
The names are extremaly similar, and Pickbothmanlol is banned for sockpuppeting Abce2|AccessDenied 20:32, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
Blocked and tagged. PeterSymonds (talk) 20:36, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
First of all, the second sockpuppet listed has the same number as the first confirmed sockpuppet listed, secondly, the third sock lised, as seen here, makes an edit with an ((indefblockeduser)) template to the user talk page of the first sockpuppet mentioned.— Dædαlus Contribs 06:51, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Checkuser is required to make sure that these accounts are indeed that of the confirmed, abusive sock master. Since we have so far had at least two more socks in the last month, it would greatly help to see if there are any other sleepers.— Dædαlus Contribs 06:51, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Clerk endorsed all listed accounts are blocked, but endorsed for rangeblock potential, and Collateral damage check. Mayalld (talk) 06:59, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Administrator note I've indef blocked the three further socks. – Toon(talk) 00:56, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
Confirmed per cross-wiki report on checkuser-l. This is for an on-EnWiki record. -- Avi (talk) 03:26, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
See Defending yourself against claims.
-- Avi (talk) 03:41, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
Add:
++Lar: t/c 23:41, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
The I.P was recently used by Pickbothmanlol, and Pickbothmanlol is banned for sockpuppetry.
See Defending yourself against claims.
![]() |
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
Self-admiting via request.
See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk declined Pickbothmanlol is already blocked as a sock, and the IP has been blocked for a year. Regards, SpitfireTally-ho! 18:40, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
He's joe-jobbing JBsupreme this time - see his contributions. He also filed a quickly-deleted SPI at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/The Sky. Can we send this Ditto back to the Daycare? —Jeremy (v^_^v Boribori!) 22:51, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
See Defending yourself against claims.
Confirmed - as part of another case - Alison ❤ 00:25, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
A unblock request from the I.P's talk page contains the name of a banned sockmaster. The Green Lombax (talk) 18:15, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk note:
Confirmed by Alison here, also found The Green Lombax (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Big Red Lobster (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) SpitfireTally-ho! 21:00, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
Two new accounts appeared on Wikipedia today: Main Edges (talk · contribs) and The Antifacist (talk · contribs). Antifacist only made 3 edits [6] [7] [8], all of them attacking Main Edges, whose account had been created just 1 hour before. Since Main Edges only had about 10 edits at the time and 9 of them were outside of mainspace, it would be quite a coincidence for Antifacist to appear on Wikipedia and see Main Edges' edits as the first thing unless he just happened to also be reading the Swastika train station page and saw the AfD as it was being created. Believable, but quite remarkable if true. —Soap— 03:08, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
See Defending yourself against claims.
I can only echo what Soap said. The fact that both of these users are editing the ANI and were only a day ond strikes me as Sock-ish....--Coldplay Expért Let's talk 03:11, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Possibly a sock of Pickmanbothlol, as Blue Eyed Zoni admitted when he blanked this page. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 03:15, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
We should probably add Pickbothmanlol based on Zoni's comment at ANI. Ks0stm (T•C•G) 03:25, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Can someone please move this so that it ends with "Pickbothmanlol". He is the likely owner, and would be the puppeteer of Main, not a sock of them. Thanks. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 03:42, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
I want to go on record as strongly objecting to User:Main Edges's lifting our draft of Themes in Avatar (2009 film) article I have been working on in my user space in collaboration with a few more editors. I am outraged. Being relatively new to Wikipedia, I do not yet know what kind of sanctions are meant for such a blatant breach of editing etiquette and ethics, but whatever they are, I ask to help apply them to User:Main Edges. Regards, Cinosaur (talk) 04:46, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Main Edges claims that a checkuser will not turn up any evidence of sockpuppetry (You will not find anything from a CU (whatever that means).), which means that if he really is the same person as Anti, that he must know how things work and took care to cover his tracks. But because checkusers can see more than just IP addresses, perhaps there will be some evidence after all. In essence my request for checkuser is based on Main Edge's claim that it will turn up nothing. It is also likely that there is a third account lurking somewhere since neither of these accounts looks like the typical new user. —Soap— 03:08, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Clerk note: All socks already blocked and tagged. Tim Song (talk) 05:32, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
Requesting a sweep for sleeper socks, account claims he has more socks to use. TNXMan 18:04, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk endorsed maybe Pickbothmanlol (talk · contribs)SPI archive, or maybe Bambifan101 (talk · contribs)SPI archive, in either case please run a sleeper check, if possible. Thanks SpitfireTally-ho! 18:25, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
Completed. Found no sleepers. --Deskana (talk) 01:25, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
Exact same editing pattern. GSK (talk ● evidence) 20:21, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Previous edits under the Rohedin account make mention of "The Order," which Sammy's edits are exclusively about. He has also violated 3RR multiple times, and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Order_(AW) recreated previously deleted material (deleted via speedy). GSK (talk ● evidence) 23:19, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
What Sammy the Seeker says is perfectly true. The username block notice says "Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below)".
I had some experience with Rohedin, and both users first edits were to create an article in user space, then copy it into article space, then use the user space article to recreate the article when it was deleted. Passes my WP:DUCK test. Yworo (talk) 00:28, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Appears to be back as User:Waraki. This user has just recreated The Order (AW). See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Order (AW). I42 (talk) 16:35, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Waraki indefinitely blocked and tagged, all creations deleted again and now salted. –MuZemike 19:50, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
User is starting to show similar behaviors of banned user Pickbothmanlol, including AFD disruption, general mainspace disruption, and lack of understanding of basic English. –MuZemike 01:25, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
See Defending yourself against claims.
-- Avi (talk) 19:35, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
Administrator note Blocked anyway. Mysteryman19 (talk · contribs) has been sufficiently disruptive to indicate a possible link and poor intent, and Thatguywiththecodes (talk · contribs) confirms that there is some form of sockpuppetry going on here. I won't tag them as socks of PBML, but I will indef them for sockpuppetry pending an explanation. --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 19:43, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Order_(cyberterrorist_gang)
All of these socks have created this page. The article needs to be deleted and protected against creation. GSK (talk ● evidence) 07:30, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Blocked and tagged. –MuZemike 07:35, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
A brand new user arrives and manages to create a custom signature and immediately sends Active Worlds to AfD. He informs me of the AfD, pointing out that User:GSK has resigned over my criticism of the article. Aside from our discussion at Talk:Active Worlds the only think GSK and I had in common was talking with User:CrackedLeo, the latest Pickbothmanlol sock. CrackedLeo also went straight to AfD as seen here. Pickbothmanlol socks have focused on trying to create an article for an Active Worlds group at The Order (cyberterrorist gang) and The Order (AW). It seems beyond mere coincidence that a brand new user would immediately know how to customize their signature, create an AfD, and be knowledgeable enough of the discussions between myself and GSK to decide to inform me of an AfD. AniMate 03:27, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
See Defending yourself against claims.
I've decided to reopen a case that was previously deleted. I've investigated the claims, I've gathered evidence, and I've reached a conclusion: Fluttershy is Pickbothmanlol. Unfortunately, explaining how I reached this conclusion is going to take out time and space, and it can't be done based on on-wiki diff's alone. Due to theexplanation's complexity, I've decided to break it down into parts. I've uploaded screenshots onto encyclopediadramatica.ch in case some of the tweets linked to below disappear.
On November 25, 2011, Markus Persson (notch on twitter) made the following tweet (image):
@adambombtv of course I am a brony.
This tweet resulted in an Equestria Daily article. Fluttershy then twice attempted to use that article as reference in the Markus Persson article: [12], [13]. Both of Fluttershy's revisions were reverted: [14], [15].
This is where the twitter account u_abusebeercans comes in. u_abusebeercans made the following tweet (http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/File:UAbusebeercansTwitterNotch.png
):
@notch @adambombtv could you happen to verify that by posting on a blog. you would be helping my ass with this wikipedia article.
u_abusebeercans wanted Markus Persson (aka notch) to make a blog entry about being a My Little Pony fan so that that blog entry could be used as a reference in a Wikipedia article. It should also be noted that u_abusebeercans publicly identifies as an "established Wikipedian" on his twitter profile.
I believe that u_abusebeercans's "established" Wikipedia account is Fluttershy and that the Wikipedia article referred in the tweet is Markus Persson's own Wikipedia biography. I believe that Fluttershy wanted an Markus Persson to make a blog entry so that his reverted revisions could be restored.
On December 18, 2011, YouTube user Iceman1234aa uploaded a video entitled "u_abusebeercans and Equestrian Citizen joint-troll True Equestria Radio." u_abusebeercans then makes two tweets about it:
http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/File:UAbusebeercansTwitterYouTube01.png
)http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/File:UAbusebeercansTwitterYouTube02.png
)On January 8, 2012, u_abusebeercans tweeted about the creation of the Iceman Republic: [16] (http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/File:UAbusebeercansTwitterIcemanRepublic.png
).
On January 15, 2012, u_abusebeercans claimed tweeted the following (http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/File:UAbusebeercansTwitterIcemanRaid.png
):
The Iceman Clan nor the Tinychat has NO involvement in the raid on the wiki. Most likely some fool that stumbled on the code.
It should be noted that both u_abusebeercans and Iceman1234aa identify as "Andrew" on their profile pages: [17], [18]. I believe that u_abusebeercans and Iceman1234aa are the same person.
Starting on December 31, 2011, u_abusebeercans began launching attacks on one of the truecapitalist.wikia.com (not to be confused with truecapitalistradio.wikia.com):
http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/File:UAbusebeercansTwitterTrueCapitalistWikia01.png
)http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/File:UAbusebeercansTwitterTrueCapitalistWikia02.png
)http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/File:UAbusebeercansTwitterTrueCapitalistWikia03.png
)http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/File:UAbusebeercansTwitterTrueCapitalistWikia04.png
)http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/File:UAbusebeercansTwitterTrueCapitalistWikia04.png
)http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/File:UAbusebeercansTwitterTrueCapitalistWikia05.png
)http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/File:UAbusebeercansTwitterTrueCapitalistWikia06.png
)http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/File:UAbusebeercansTwitterTrueCapitalistWikia07.png
)http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/File:UAbusebeercansTwitterTrueCapitalistWikia08.png
)http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/File:UAbusebeercansTwitterTrueCapitalistWikia09.png
)http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/File:UAbusebeercansTwitterTrueCapitalistWikia10.png
)http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/File:UAbusebeercansTwitterTrueCapitalistWikia11.png
)http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/File:UAbusebeercansTwitterTrueCapitalistWikia12.png
)http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/File:UAbusebeercansTwitterTrueCapitalistWikia13.png
)http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/File:UAbusebeercansTwitterTrueCapitalistWikia14.png
)http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/File:UAbusebeercansTwitterTrueCapitalistWikia15.png
)http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/File:UAbusebeercansTwitterTrueCapitalistWikia16.png
)http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/File:UAbusebeercansTwitterTrueCapitalistWikia17.png
)http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/File:UAbusebeercansTwitterTrueCapitalistWikia18.png
)http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/File:UAbusebeercansTwitterTrueCapitalistWikia19.png
)http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/File:UAbusebeercansTwitterTrueCapitalistWikia20.png
)http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/File:UAbusebeercansTwitterTrueCapitalistWikia21.png
)http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/File:UAbusebeercansTwitterTrueCapitalistWikia22.png
)http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/File:UAbusebeercansTwitterTrueCapitalistWikia23.png
)http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/File:UAbusebeercansTwitterTrueCapitalistWikia24.png
)http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/File:UAbusebeercansTwitterTrueCapitalistWikia25.png
)http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/File:UAbusebeercansTwitterTrueCapitalistWikia26.png
)AdmiralZhao007 (aka "Ray") was a sysop during most of u_abusebeercans' attacks on the True Capitalist Wikia. This made AdmiralZhao007 a target of u_abusebeercans' attacks. In fact, on January 9, 2012, u_abusebeercans demanded that AdmiralZhao007 / ray be desysopped (http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/File:UAbusebeercansTwitterTrueCapitalistWikia25.png
):
@TurdBurgular1 then why the hell do you contribute to it, you fucking hypocrite. drop ray as an admin, and the raids end
On January 10, 2012, AdmiralZhao007 decided to quit and was desysopped and blocked.
During the attacks, AdmiralZhao007 attempted to ask TheNiggestCrookForce (aka NCF) for u_abusebeercans' dox. This backfired since TheNiggestCrookForce was actually a troll aligned with u_abusebeercans. u_abusebeercans then tweeted a screenshot of AdmiralZhao007's message: [19]. This screenshot (http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/File:AdmiralZhaoUAbusebeercans01.png
) contains the following:
Here's what I have on him so far: http://pastebin.com/eDYSvqJW
The pastebin.com page that AdmiralZhao007 created identifies Fluttershy as u_abusebeercans' Wikipedia account.
Establishing that Fluttershy (Wikipedia), u_abusebeercans (Twitter), and Iceman1234aa (YouTube) are operated by the same individual is easy; establishing their relationship to Pickbothmanlol is harder, but it can be done.
Back in 2010, when the original Encyclopedia Dramatica, an ED user discovered that the YouTube account Iceman1234aa belonged to Pickbothmanlol. This ED user decided to pickbothmanlol on YouTube. I'm not making this up. Please copy and paste the following Wayback Machine link for the original ED's Pickbothmanlol article (dated November 14, 2010) onto your address bar:
http://web.archive.org/web/20101114011948/http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Pickbothmanlol#External_links
If you view the external links listed, you'll notice the following:
Pickbothmanlol at YouTube – An impersonator; pbml needs to learn how to register and "sit on" his alternate handles.
On September 17, 2010, this impersonator uploaded "Iceman1234aa has some random bullshit to say." The summary for the video is "reuploaded in case he deletes it."
Even on Wikipedia, Pickbothmanlol's connection to Iceman12[34aa] is revealed.
The infamous Iceman comes to Wikipedia, sound the alarms. Buddy, why would I promote a defunct clan long gone? Sammy the Seeker (talk) 20:37, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
One final thing, I admit that I am in the Iceman Clan and that Iceman12 or PBML who you refer to 12 as on Wikipedia is as well, but that doesn't mean we are the same person. GSK knows that the Iceman Clan has the intention to delete creations, and PBML/Ice12 adopted that goal long ago and applied it everywhere else. The only thing that GSK has proved is that PBML is a Iceman member called Iceman12 who caused a lot of trouble of AW. Sammy the Seeker (talk) 23:49, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
I believe that it's clear that Iceman1234aa is Pickbothmanlol.
Recent tweets by u_abusebeercans also provide evidence for Fluttershy being his Wikipedia account. On January 2, 2011, u_abusebeercans made the following tweet (http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/File:UAbusebeercansTwitterNeverSleep.png
):
Gay black people never sleep Wikipedia, do not forget. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2011_December_31
On that same day, Fluttershy removed Template:Delrev from the GNAA article and used "Gay black pride for life. WP:DR closed."
On January 24, 2012, u_abusebeercans made the following tweet (http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/File:UAbusebeercansTwitterDisgracing.png
):
I had two people blocked from Wikipedia in one discussion. One for malware posting, and one for disgracing the GNAA.
This tweet implies that u_abusebeercans was directly involved in this WP:AN/I discussion. The "one for malware posting" is referring to Princess_Derpy, while "one for disgracing the GNAA" is referring to Selery. Fluttershy initiated the discussion that resulted in both of those blocks. I believe that Fluttershy was using the u_abusebeercans twitter account in order to boast about what he sees as an accomplishment.
On January 25, 2012, u_abusebeercans confirms that he was referring to Princess Derpy and Selery in the following tweet (http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/File:UAbusebeercansTwitterDerpy.png
):
@Gary_Niger I did not realize that Derpy was GNAA. My only intention was to rid of Selery and his racist views.
The second sentence of that tweet implies that Fluttershy's sole goal with creating that AN/I was to oust Selery from the project. That would be considered disruptive.
On January 25, 2012, u_abusebeercans mentions User:Incognito in a tweet (http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/File:UAbusebeercansTwitterIncognito.png
). On January 26, 2012, Fluttershy brings up how Incognito has File:Gnaa-logo.png on his or her user page.
In the "Iceman1234aa is Pickbothmanlol" section, I've established a solid connection between Pickbothmanlol and Iceman1234aa. In "u_abusebeercans and Iceman1234aa", I provided evidence for Iceman1234aa and u_abusebeercans being the same person. In "u_abusebeercans' attacks on Wikia", I posted evidence of u_abusebeercans' attacks on Wikia. u_abusebeercans isn't the sort of person one should want on Wikipedia. In "Fluttershy, u_abusebeercans, and Markus Persson", "AdmiralZhao007 links u_abusebeercans to Fluttershy", and "Fluttershy is u_abusebeercans", I showed that u_abusebeercans and Fluttershy are the same person. In conclusion: Pickbothmanlol = Iceman1234aa = u_abusebeercans = Fluttershy.
--Michaeldsuarez (talk) 02:04, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
Starting In late December 2006, wiki.activeworlds.com was hit by a spree of vandalism. An user named Iceman appeared and vandalized that wiki's Main Page. Early sockpuppets of Iceman included Strike Rapier, Icemanreturns, Iceman43, and Iceman4343. Eventually, Iceman returned as Pickbothmanlol Iceman. Above, I've provided evidence for Pickbothmanlol and Iceman being the same person.
In October 2010, Pickbothmanlol / Iceman returned to wiki.activeworlds.com as Kevin Morrison. On October 30, 2010, User:GSK blocked Kevin Morrison with the following summary:
Abusing multiple accounts: User has been permabanned in past. Otherwise, cute.
On October 23, 2010 (around the same time Kevin Morrison was active at wiki.activeworlds.com), Fluttershy created his account (then named SixthAtom). Fluttershy created an article that was later deleted and oversighted on November 22, 2010: [20], [21]. Jclemens recently stated that the article had "(cyberterrorist)" appended to the end. After searching around a bit, I've determined that this deleted article must've been "Kevin_Morrison_(cyberterrorist)". Although the article has been oversighted, there's still evidence of its previously existence: Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard/Archive99#Kevin_Morrison_.28cyberterrorist.29. Fluttershy apparently wrote an article on one of Pickbothmanlol's / Iceman's vandal personas. Why? Most likely because Fluttershy, Pickbothmanlol, Iceman, and Kevin Morrison are the same person. Fluttershy wrote an article on himself.
--Michaeldsuarez (talk) 20:41, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
On A YouTube video with "Andrew Crogonk" was uploaded from an account linking to his main account (claiming him to be the one in the video). This user has repeatedly attempted to create a page on himself, to have it removed every time. The account that uploaded the video claims "NOTE:This channel is owned by Andrew's Iceman Network and by West", Iceman1234aa is Fluttershy's main channel. The account, is clearly a sock of known vandal Pickbothmanlol. Additionally, he has repeatedly posted about Encyclopedia Dramatica, where he attempted to promote his vandalism. Itgetsworse (talk) 03:37, 26 January 2012 (UTC) |
It should be noted that this user continues to suspiciously remove ((sockpuppet)) from his userpage. Itgetsworse (talk) 14:00, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
|
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/index.php?title=User_talk:Meepsheep&diff=329616&oldid=329287
http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/index.php?title=User_talk:Meepsheep&diff=329627&oldid=329616
http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/index.php?title=User_talk:JuniusThaddeus&diff=329630&oldid=328616
[22], [23] – Out of curiosity, what was Fluttershy's first article? This would help determine the original motivation behind the account's creation. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 03:27, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
*
Clerk endorsed - I'm going to endorse for a checkuser, then, to find any other accounts here. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 16:38, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
According to Betacommand and some others at AN/I, Fluttershy is a Pickbothmanlol sockpuppet. Fluttershy has been heavily active in My Little Pony articles.
So what's the connection here? My Little Pony, the GNAA, etc. There are probably other socks but I don't want to go through listing every one. Night Ranger (talk) 01:08, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Pickbothmanlol/Archive#27_January_2012, [27], [28] – Fluttershy being a sockpuppet of Pickbothmanlol has already been conclusively established, and Fluttershy is now open about being Pickbothmanlol. Fluttershy has also released a statement. I don't believe that SweetieBelleMLP, Princess Derpy, Badmachine, Incognito, Roambassador, or Mythpage88 are Pickbothmanlol's sockpuppets. Also, the Checkuser tool might have already been used (probably more than once) on Princess Derpy / LoverPony: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/LoverPony/Archive, [29], [30]. If SweetieBelleMLP, Princess Derpy, Badmachine, Incognito, Roambassador, and Mythpage88 weren't caught in the previous CheckUser uses, then will they seriously be caught by CheckUser this time? I don't even believe that there's enough evidence to warrant the use of the CheckUser tool. I don't support HelloAnnyong's endorsement. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 03:47, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
In response to what Elen of the Roads asked: I believe that the CheckUser tool has already been used more than once on Prencess Derpy. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/LoverPony/Archive, [31], [32]. All of the accounts that Night Ranger suspected made revisions during the last three months. If they were Princess Derpy's sockpuppets, then the CheckUser tool would've caught them in its previous uses. The CheckUser tool hasn't produced any evidence so far, and Night Ranger hasn't provided enough behavioral evidence to support the sockpuppetry claims. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 16:42, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
User:SweetieBelleMLP has now been indef blocked for trolling, harassment, and impersonation (takes yer pick). His edits and trolls are pretty much identical to Princess Derpy's. In addition to similarities already noted, these edits also include use of the his user page to foist sexually explicit images on others and use of other editor's images to harass them. If CheckUser failed to uncover a direct link between these two accounts, then I suggest we make the connection via DUCK. Rklawton (talk) 17:24, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
I'm not sure why my name was brought up other than I edit MLP articles from time to time and have edited the gnaa article once or twice. Mythpage88 (talk) 19:20, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
I'm guessing that those who doubt the obvious fact that these two are socks have not conducted an edit by edit review of both accounts. Their edit histories are short, and the similarities in writing, tone, tact, etc are obvious. Rklawton (talk) 22:19, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
sorry if i am posting in the wrong section, but here goes. i will take you up on that bet, Elen of the Roads. i have not abused multiple accounts. i have added template:doppelganger-other to my one doppleganger account, to prevent impersonation. per policy, i do not edit from this account, save for one or two done by accident while logged in. you may go have a look at a photograph of me at age 18 or 19 on my userpage, which now contains no male genitalia thanks to the efforts of people who do not see the hypocrisy of claiming wikipedia is not censored, yet will not permit me to have an image of a rather attractive penis on my page. i believe that to be one of the finest images on this project, and for that, i do not apologize. the user doesn't mind, why the hell do you guys care? the policy page says that nudity on userpages of established users is not strictly prohibited. -badmachine 5:48 pm, Today (UTC−8) [restored 04:28, 7 February 2012 (UTC)]
Wikipedia calls me "The President of the GNAA" and thus I may have a WP:COI with anything I edit on Wikipedia. Feel free to bring it up with me!
--Harizotoh9 (talk) 10:06, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
--MuZemike 04:19, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
I'm going to mark this for close. Yes, there are shared editing interests between the accounts, but that appears to be all, for now. I would suggest everyone continue to monitor the relevant articles/talk pages, as they tend to attract trolls anyway, regardless of whether or not they're PBML. Further disruption can be reported to ANI or (with solid supporting evidence) here. TNXMan 16:08, 7 February 2012 (UTC)