Oluwa2Chainz

Oluwa2Chainz (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

07 August 2016

Suspected sockpuppets


Choccitymusic1 was created on 7 August with one of his three edits voting for keep on the AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koker (musician). Obari2Kay also has similar edits like that of the already blocked Markzy90. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 10:47, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I'm afraid you're yet to block User:Choccitymusic1. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 15:05, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

11 May 2017

Suspected sockpuppets


This edit shows MKJ6006 requesting the undeletion of the Sugarboy article which has been deleted multiple times upon it's creation from both him and Obari2Kay. Both have also !voted keep on the afd Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dice Ailes (2nd nomination) another non-notable artist related to Choccitymusic1. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 13:20, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Let see how may Keep & Delete we have.

Keep Delete Not sure (Keep vs Delete) Redirect
3 2 1 1

If i was to add "MKJ6006" contribution, it would be.

Keep Delete Not sure (Keep vs Delete) Redirect
4 2 1 1


But since it is a 50/50 possibility of it been a Sockpuppet and undergoing "Sockpuppet investigations" let not count "MKJ6006" contribution to the adf. That bring us back to 3 Keep, so i don't see why "BD2412" would close the adf with the word "The result was no consensus to delete". Look into this, i feel their is a conspiracy in this.--Obari2Kay (talk) 07:33, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"BD2412" has explained everything to me User_talk:BD2412#Dice Ailes, thank's for your time. I now understand where he was driving to @Bbb23:.--Obari2Kay (talk) 11:41, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"Oluwa2Chainz" I advice you pick out your fact correctly not saying MKJ6006 contributions , you'll find out that his first edits were on 5 open afd discussions. An you also answered yourself by saying "Quite awkward for a new user if you ask me". So it's normal for a new user, or are you trying to tell me when you joined Wikipedia, you where perfect?. An also the same Wale Ojo article you talking about, on the afd their are good responses. Don't forget their is also Wole Ojo, i checked MKJ6006 talk page an also saw it was also nominated, but on that afd you said "Keep as "Darreg" rightly pointed out. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:21, 18 May 2017 (UTC)". Guest the user is improving, an please stop involving me with the name "MKJ6006".. I only write longer article, not to short as "MKJ6006" did and not about movies or actors/actress expect for the Big Brother Naija housemate Gifty Powers which got deleted. I am a huge lover of reality shows & music, let just say "Entertainment" expect for Nigeria movies and their actors/actresses. I write only about, singles "Hell Naw", the artist and the album, if i have one to write. I don't see any poor English here Wale Ojo & Wole Ojo so point out your fact correctly. Please look closely @Bbb23: you would see what am saying, thank's.--Obari2Kay (talk) 06:12, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

The two accounts are  Possible.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:01, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Versace1608: Please get your facts straight. "a check user needs to compare the two" - I've already done that. Second "the administrators who handled the case didn't compare the users to each other" - The CheckUser correctly found that at the time MKJ606 was  Stale.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:05, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

11 November 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Both SPAs at Publiseer. Sock creates it and then master starts editing here . Both edit on different days. At the AfD both immediately chip in here and here . They admit they are linked here. If not socks then certainly meat. Looks very much like paid editing. Since originally posting, Oluwa2Chainz has suggested here that Papiko73, Skop94 and Molobi34 are also potential socks. This would suggest that the master is Coal Press Nation . There are certainly some behavioural similarities with the editing of Bob276 editing here whi is a confirmed sock. Velella  Velella Talk   10:29, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Please this is not possible. I've interacted with Kaizenify and can say with the highest degree of confidence that hes not Oluwa2Chainz. There's most likely a mixup somewhere. And none of the editors was given a chance to speak??? ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 23:56, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That they share IPs is unquestionable. As an example, I have them on the same IP where one makes this edit and twenty minutes later, the other makes this one. That isn't a one-off...
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 03:49, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by Sir Sputnik as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

10 May 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

Several articles this user has created are Oluwa recreations and their edits indicate to me (from the start) that they were not a new user. See Publiseer.com, St. Chika. Most creations also follow a similar pattern where Sono creates followed by an SPA editing as well, see for example: Steveoduntan, Mascodigital, etc...

Also significant overlap here. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:36, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

04 September 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

This seems to be some sort of meat puppetry/UPE spam ring as nearly every edit overlaps with this master and MassiveYR CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 11:06, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

The suspected sock is not using proxies and they are in a different country from Oluwa2Chainz, far enough that I don't think this is directly related. Meat is possible.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 15:57, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

10 October 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

Created two perfectly formatted and referenced-bombed advert articles, for company Publiseer Digital Publishing and its owner Chidi Nwaogu.

The point here is that, Publiseer Digital Publishing was created at this title to evade two extant salting on Publiseer and Publiseer.com; the titles where the Master (and their socks) of this SPI tried in vain to create the article numerous times.

Moreover, the logo of the article was uploaded to Commons by Steveoduntan (talk · contribs), a confirmed sock of the master.

I just added another account Djamillekibotto (talk · contribs). They re-created St. Chika, an article about the other founder of the Publiseer.com which was also deleted twice and had link with the master. They did this both here and on French Wikipedia. It's using the picture provided on Commons by Sonoafricano (talk · contribs); another confirmed socks in this paid editing ring.

Both accounts have zero edit which is not directly-related to the above listed articles. –Ammarpad (talk) 21:09, 10 October 2018 (UTC) /[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

02 October 2018

Suspected sockpuppets


Since User:Timi422 joined Wikipedia, all the BLP's he has been creating has been for for topics previously deleted via an AFD discussion, and all the previous article creators have been blocked. DJ Kentalky (jockey) has been created/edited severally by many sockpuppets associated with the master sock and its currently salted. Timi422 has worked earnestly towards moving it to mainspace by visiting deletion review and submitting an AFC request. Within a space of one month, he has created article for an un-notable actress Abimbola Ogunnowo article twice. Laura Ikeji (an article recently created by Timi) was first created by User:MKJ6006 who is also blocked sock. He also included incorrect information in the article to make her seem more notable, and survive AFD Several un-notable songs, by the un-notable artist Odunsi (The Engine) has also been created by the master sock. In fact, the article was previously deleted here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Odunsi (The Engine), where the master sock was !voted for it to be kept. The only other non-BLP was for Mr 2Kay discography, a disco article which follows similar format as other disco articles for the master, and Mr 2Kay is an article that the master significantly contributed to. As a former sock myself (many years ago), I know when an editor is evading a block to contribute to Wikipedia and when he is doing it illegitimately to edit COI articles, I am almost entirely sure this is the case of the latter. I just wish clerks will see reasons with me. Please note that he's an experienced editor so he knows what to say to keep his suspected COI articles in mainspace, and not be seen as a troublesome editor, by being in the good books of good faith editors. HandsomeBoy (talk) 07:32, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Its obvious you don't know me, because if you do, you will know that I will go an extra mile to ensure a knowledgeable editor interested in Nigerian content remains on Wikipedia. Infact I even try to overlook and stay clear if the issue is a minor one or my comments might instigate revoking their rights, which was exactly what I have been doing concerning your presence on Wikipedia, but you continue to create/significantly contribute to topics that are targets of same set of COI editors!
And this is simply about doing what is right. When I tell people online, that I am a very honest person in real life (Not trying to blow my horn, but I talk alot online), they might find it hard to believe because of obvious reasons, but that is for another day.
I'll rather spend my time on Wikipedia adding content than investigating another editor, which was why I hesitated opening this for so long. I mean the time I used in opening this case will be more valuable to me if it was invested in creating a film article, but the dissatisfaction I always feel when I see your contributions in my Watchlist was what compelled me to open this case. Even if there is no relationship between the two accounts (I still think you're a sock of someone), I will just move on; wish you good luck, hoping you will at least stop the COI edits, even if you want to continue socking. At least, I have done everything I could do within my power to restore sanity and ensure only legitimate contents are on Wikipedia.HandsomeBoy (talk) 19:21, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Honestly I don't really care if you honest real life or fake life or on life or off life or social life or off social life, you haven't answered my question yet and that the problem with Nigerians they wouldn't give you a straight forward honest answer. Back to my question "I want to know where it is written on Wikipedia whereby articles deleted many years ago can't be rewriting by someone else or writing it again automatically makes you a sockpuppet. HandsomeBoy please give me answers.--Timi422 (talk) 06:02, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

19 August 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

Nearly identical recreation of Sonoafricano's St. Chika as St Chika, including uploading their photo and using the same exact template[1] Praxidicae (talk) 20:57, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

17 November 2019

Suspected sockpuppets


I believe the editor Kaizenify is a sock master of this editor : Teebabalola and is currently using this as a means to !vote on AFD’s such as this Right Here In this edit here - Evidence 1 Kaizenify creates an article titled David Oluwatobiloba Adeyemi and in the subsequent edits to that article he establishes his modus operandi as per not using/rarely using the edit summary box; Such as in this - Evidence 2 & Evidence 3. We can see he rarely uses his edit summary box. Now a certain editor named Teebabalola joins the encyclopedia two months ago and from his edits, shows he isn’t a newcomer as he immediately begins to edit heavily on the David Oluwatobiloba Adeyemi article, the same page created by Kaizenify and exhibits same edit pattern by not using his edit summary box which we can observe in this -Evidence 4, Evidence 5, & Evidence 6. The editor also edits using promotional tones and writing patterns that makes article appear like a Curriculum Vitae/Resume just as Kaizenify does. Furthermore and more intersting is the editor Teebabalola acts as if it is a single purpose account as all edits made by the editor are related to the article created by Kaizenify , Now a current AFD is taking place - AFD of David Oluwatobiloba Adeyemi & I believe sock master is using his other account which i believe is Teebabalola to !vote. The fact that they exhibit same style of editing, same interest in the aforementioned article makes me believe Kaizenify may be using more than one account to edit the encyclopedia. Celestina007 (talk) 15:14, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I naturally would have love to stay silent without making any comment and let the process be completed but it’s important to shed some light here and also make Celestina007 understand that this is a clear hoax and watery. I created the article David Oluwatobiloba Adeyemi just like every other Nigerian articles that have created to make spotlights on great Nigerians who are definitely doing great things... I created this article on 15th of September 2019 as a stub as seen here then on 29 October, I reverted edits made by Teebabalola and innovativedavid as I sensed it to be a conflict of interest as seen here; also immediately I dropped a message on both innovativedavid and Teebabalola talkpage about COI as seen here and here ... Furthermore, I reverted more of the edits by Teebabalola due to COI and in promo tone as seen here and here until Celestina007 came in... She inquired about me using Teebabalola here as a sock on my talkpage and which I immediately explained to her and said NO. So it’s obvious that this is just a mixup and waste of process but still let a checkuser admin run the process as that will validate the truth here, also wish there can be penalty for users who initiate process like this and ended been non-true. Thanks Kaizenify (talk)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

I'm busy at the moment but I thought I'd link this for checkusers and these two confirmed accounts from previous investigation:

Given the information posted by Berean Hunter above, the two accounts listed were confirmed to Oluwa2Chainz, which is older than the Kaizenify account. I'm going to move and merge this SPI case to the correct apparent master. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:08, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
They are using different devices and have a range in common. This case should be evaluated based on behavior.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 14:44, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Berean Hunter: could you clarify who they refers to? Chybels? Imagekraft? Kaizenify? -- RoySmith (talk) 14:54, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Roy, They refers to Kaizenify and Teebabalola. Chybels and Imagekraft are  Confirmed socks of Kaizenify. For some history, see this thread and the ones that follow. Oluwa2Chainz is a different person than Kaizenify but they were meatpuppets and not just the two of them were involved.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 16:40, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
More