Iniced

Iniced (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

07 August 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

I noticed many similarities among these users. Iniced has made it known they do not approve of trivia. ThetriviaBlanker and Thegetingridoftriviauser were single purpose troll accounts who would remove trivia from the same Tom and Jerry articles Iniced did. Same deal with the example IP I listed. I know there are many more troll accounts like ThetriviaBlanker/Thegettingridoftriviauser and IP's that I just can't remember at the moment. Iniced also has a very unique way of replacing apostrophes with commas in edit summaries and occasionally misspelling their name as "inced" as seen on their talk page: Compare this edit summary with this, and also this and this with this. Call me crazy, but I think these are all the same person. If this really is just a coincidence though my sincerest apologies, Iniced. Sro23 (talk) 03:53, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

09 August 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

This edit summary:[1] they replace apostrophe with comma, just like Iniced. For whatever reason, Iniced IPsocks seem to blank user and user talk pages, and Roaded has been reverting 86.141.246.179's edits, another IPsock (so actually self reverts) on User:TheSpoonman and User talk:TheSpoonman.[2] [3] [4] Here Iniced also edited the page:[5]. Iniced has ownership issues. Sro23 (talk) 19:59, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Confirmed, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:19, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

21 August 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Same removal of trivia from Tom and Jerry articles, definitely reminiscent of past sock User:Roaded: [6] [7], etc. Sro23 (talk) 03:31, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Confirmed, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 10:42, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

14 December 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Removing trivia from the Tom and Jerry cartoons, same as other socks. [8] [9] Sro23 (talk) 19:00, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

24 January 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

86.128.163.163 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) (already blocked for block evasion) removes unsourced trivia from Tom and Jerry cartoons, and Followalltherules restores it. [10] [11]. Sock User:Alleditersmustfollowrules did the same thing with 86.163.56.201 (talk · contribs · WHOIS): [12] Sro23 (talk) 01:47, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Confirmed, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:16, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

23 February 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Already blocked but fairly obvious duck. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:57, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

20 June 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Same interest in the same unsourced trivia in the same article as prior socks (e.g., [13],[14], [15], [16], etc.). SummerPhDv2.0 15:59, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I dislike the unsourced trivia too but a lot of users do it. These are two completely different people. Sro23 (talk) 06:18, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Oops. Yes. Ritvik12 and Iniced have tangled histories. This is clearly Iniced. - SummerPhDv2.0 01:30, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, I've gone ahead and cut-and-pasted your report under Iniced. Clerks, I apologize if this was the wrong way to do it. Mz7 (talk) 05:20, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

14 July 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Good hand new account with the bad hand IPsock- [17] [18] Sro23 (talk) 07:23, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

04 August 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Removed the same content on the same page ([19] [20]) Sro23 (talk) 17:52, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by Sro23 as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

30 August 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Restoring IP sock's edit ([21] [22]) Sro23 (talk) 15:50, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by Sro23 as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

02 September 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

The usual good-hand bad-hand editing with an IPsock: [23] Sro23 (talk) 18:04, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by Sro23 as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

03 September 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

The usual good-hand bad-hand editing with an IP sock ([24]). Sro23 (talk) 19:20, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by Sro23 as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

13 September 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Good hand Bad-hand editing with a sock IP ([25] [26]). Sro23 (talk) 12:41, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

06 October 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

It sounds like there is a big connection between these two editors - especially at User:Pkbwcgs/sandbox. Both users were harassing and blanking my sandbox. I wonder if there is a sock master operating both of these accounts. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:32, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

27 November 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

The usual good hand bad hand dance done with an IPsock. Sro23 (talk) 01:04, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

12 December 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

[27] [28] The usual tag-teaming with an IPsock. Sro23 (talk) 19:06, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

28 January 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

Tag-teaming with an IPsock: [29] Sro23 (talk) 18:59, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

12 April 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

pretty significant overlap with past socks, same behavior, specifically the fake helpfulness and also see ef. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:25, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


12 April 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

Both the IP and this user is spamming my talk page at the same time. 86.186.60.215 (talk · contribs) has been blocked for vandalism but now Heretosaveyou (talk · contribs) started spamming my talk page. Pkbwcgs (talk) 12:39, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please close. Both users are blocked. Pkbwcgs (talk) 12:44, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

26 February 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

Block evasion, along with User:Doingitwellordoingitwrong and User:Nowelcomemessagesthanks (both already blocked). DannyS712 (talk) 09:28, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm requesting check user because this case should be renamed to whatever is the oldest account, and the CU should check for sleepers (I am not requesting that the IP be connected publicly with the accounts) --DannyS712 (talk) 09:29, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
See also Special:Diff/885159232 --DannyS712 (talk) 09:32, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The IP/editor (Youwellwellwhohaveguessit) keep switching off editing, suggesting that it is the same user on the same device:
  1. IP edits 08:46 - 09:06
  2. User edits 09:09 - 09:11
  3. IP edits 09:15 - 09:25
  4. User edits 09:25 - 09:27
All times 26 February 2019 (UTC) --DannyS712 (talk) 09:35, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This is actually an older sockmaster, so I have moved the page accordingly. Closing case. now. Sro23 (talk) 22:16, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

More