Dompreston

Dompreston (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
08 November 2013
Suspected sockpuppets


Relatively established account (Dompreston) stopped editing at the beginning of September, around the same time that "new" account started. One of Dompreston's last edits was to create this article in his sandbox [1]. One of Vegas Bound's first edits was to create same article with same content in article space [2]. Appears to be using multiple accounts to evade WP:COI. Logical Cowboy (talk) 04:41, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

05 February 2014
Suspected sockpuppets


I encountered the article Rail-Veyor (material handling system) and saw that it was new. I remembered seeing the article in the past. I found that the article Rail-Veyor had been deleted because it was created by a blocked or banned user. I found the November 2013 investigation Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dompreston/Archive. I found a version of the article above at User:Dompreston/sandbox. I saw that User:TVLover23478 had an edit history of 14 quick edits and the creation of the article above. I saw that banned User:Vegas Bound 2014, mentioned in the November 2013 investigation, had a similar history of quick edits. SchreiberBike talk 07:02, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Should Rail-Veyor (material handling system), be deleted, or do I need to take it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion? Despite being created by a sock puppet, it may be notable. At least it should be moved back to Rail-Veyor as the disambiguation is not needed, I'll go to Wikipedia:Requested moves if it can't be taken care of here. Thanks, SchreiberBike talk 07:41, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments