User:Dance-pop

Dance-pop (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Dance-pop

Dance-pop (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Report date February 20 2009, 04:25 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Daniel Case (talk)

While reviewing unblock requests, I came across a request by the IP user to lift an autoblock. Unusually, the IP had a somewhat active recent contrib history. I decided to investigate the blocked user to see if there was any similarity between their edit histories.

I hit paydirt. It seems both Dance-pop (in the middle of his second one-week block for disruptive editing in almost as many weeks) and this IP have focused almost exclusively on Lady GaGa and related articles (songs, discography). And on this AfD, both the IP and Dance-pop voted keep. Vote stacking, on top of block evasion. Nice.

The reviewer will note that both have a slightly-imperfect, perhaps non-native, English and a tendency not to capitalize, and to make minor typoes or misspellings.

I haven't asked for a checkuser because the quacking is too loud. Although it might be a good idea as a followup to see if there are any more in the drawer. Daniel Case (talk) 04:25, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum: The block has already been extended to a month for this. Daniel Case (talk) 04:33, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 Relisted bot was down Mayalld (talk) 14:25, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. 
Seems to be pretty conclusive, and action has already been taken. Is there anything else that needs doing here?  PeterSymonds (talk) 14:29, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Case is closed. When Dance-pop was a newbie I tried hinting at him to stop using the IP. He denied it belonged to him. I knew it did, asked a few admins to monitor it, but on the whole I did little about it. Now that Dance-pop has been caught by an admin he is trying to pass the IP off on his younger brother (despite maintaining for several weeks it had nothing to do with him). Dance-Pop should have taken my hint several weeks ago, instead of pretending to be ignorant. — R2 16:16, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Report date June 30 2009, 04:53 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by Legolas2186

The contributions history will show that. The same edit warring at theLady Gaga articles and going against consensus. --Legolas (talk2me) 04:53, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users

This user continously partakes in disruptive contributions to Wikipedia including that of going against consensus, making personal attacks, not assuming good faith, edit warring and bringing forward unnecessary drama that we could all deal without. This user has been blocked many times before using previous identities and has obviously not been learnt from their mistakes. There has been no progress with the operator of these numerous accounts. This user does not deserve another chance as improvement is beyond his or her capabilities. • вяαdcяochat 06:03, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CheckUser requests
Checkuser request – code letter: B (Ongoing serious pattern vandalism )
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by --Legolas (talk2me) 04:53, 30 June 2009 (UTC) [reply]



Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
  • No, however Dance-pop (the original account) has been known to be very disruptive in the area of dispute, and has created several sockpuppets to evade blocks. Technically, the user is banned under the "nobody willing to unblock" definition, but no formal ban has been brought forth. Because of this, I've changed the Checkuser request code above from E to B; I still think a CU could be useful in this case to investigate the possibility of IP or (small) range blocks. Hersfold (t/a/c) 23:46, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Confirmed the following appear to be the same person:
  1. Hubert le Phacochère (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  2. Feknerham (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  3. TheMinutemen (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  4. Vigilante Hero (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  5. Costume Hero (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  6. Prince Ozymandias (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  7. Pokemon1993 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  8. Cloverfield Monsta (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  9. Truth of the World: Welcome to the Show (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  10. I am Rorschach (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
 IP blocked. – Luna Santin (talk) 23:47, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Conclusions
Tiptoety talk 00:01, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This case has been marked as closed. It will be archived after its final review by a Clerk or Checkuser.



Report date July 2 2009, 08:28 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by HermanHiddema


This user is continuing a discussion at Talk:Chess#Chess_a_sport, previously engaged in by User:Cloverfield_Monsta and User:Truth_of_the_World:_Welcome_to_the_Show, both previously identified sockpuppets of Dance-pop. Furthermore, the user is editing Lady Gaga related pages, as other sockpuppets have done. HermanHiddema (talk) 08:28, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users

The sock completely vandalised two Lady Gaga related articles which I believe is in retaliation for his block. I prefer a range block in this case. --Legolas (talk2me) 05:53, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request for CheckUser
Checkuser request – code letter: E + F (Community ban/sanction evasion and another reason)
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below. Requested by Tiptoety talk 18:25, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 Inconclusive open proxy,  IP blocked. -- Luk talk 12:28, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.


10 June 2012
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Blatant WP:DUCK. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 05:02, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
17 June 2012
Suspected sockpuppets

Just in case sleeper check while I duck block this guy. Self endorsed. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 01:49, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
They don't appear to be editing from proxies at the moment. Found one account though: Dancepoplegolas212 (talk · contribs). I could try to place a rangeblock, but I need more data so that we can have a more effective block. Elockid (Talk) 13:39, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
16 September 2012
Suspected sockpuppets

"My friend" deserves this? Fairly obvious sock. Theopolisme 03:21, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


16 September 2012
Suspected sockpuppets

Quack. Jasper Deng (talk) 04:41, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

By looking at the block log, this appears to have already been dealt with. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 08:59, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

31 December 2012
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

This edit seems enough for a CU. If it is not the same person, should be blocked due to the name. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 04:51, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
26 January 2013
Suspected sockpuppets

Duck, filing for the record. Rschen7754 02:57, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Gargoylea (talk · contribs) is  Confirmed. No sleepers that I could find.

CKJRT A D M I N (talk · contribs) has the same user agent as Gargoylea, but the IP geolocates to the other side of the world. However s/he is accessing Wikipedia through an IP address that appears to be part of some kind of a VPN. I'm going to have to call this  Inconclusive from a technical aspect. From a non-technical aspect, I'd say they are almost certainly a sock of someone, and  Likely to be a sock of Dance-pop. J.delanoygabsadds 03:34, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

05 May 2013
Suspected sockpuppets

Openly states so. See this page:http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ATRL&oldid=553585333 . Also, all edits by this user state they are a sockpuppet. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 04:55, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User already blocked. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 05:04, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive, obvious sock. See http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ATRL&oldid=553585842&diff=prev Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 04:59, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User blocked. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 05:04, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
29 September 2013
Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK (see deleted contribs), requesting sleeper check. Rschen7754 05:06, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
More