117.200.23.44 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

18 April 2011

Suspected sockpuppets

• 117.242.52.26 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 121.219.248.222 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 128.62.38.159 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 122.172.156.146 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 122.169.141.24 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 173.183.79.81 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log)) (denying that he/she is the same as the previous IPs)
• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

See [1]. These IPs are all quacking out loud. Apparently trying to circumvent 3RR. Jasper Deng (talk) 01:10, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• I requested CheckUser because I want to see if these IPs are the same. If they are, they can be blocked for edit warring.Jasper Deng (talk) 01:41, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Declined – With mere IP-related disruption, I doubt checking will help much here. That said, I have semi-protected Pawan Kalyan for 1 week. –MuZemike 01:23, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Aside from protecting the article, I can't see much else that can be done here. The ranges are far too wide to do any sort of effective rangeblock. Closing for now, but relist if things change. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 02:30, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
•  Clerk note: Few things:

• 173.183.79.81 (talk · contribs) is a mobile Network in British Columbia, Canada
• 128.62.38.159 (talk · contribs) is from Austin University in Texas. It's  Possible that this is a mobile network.
• 122.172.156.146 (talk · contribs) & 122.169.141.24 (talk · contribs) are from the same range, and we have had abuse from this network on WP:IRC. That's not anything conclusive though.
• 122.169.141.24 (talk · contribs) is a  Confirmed current webhost,  Likely some kind of proxy...but not definitive.

I think proxies are involved in someway here, but without being notified with in a few minutes of use, or even half an hour...I fear some of these are going dead. No other conclusive results. Putting this on hold for a day or two pending any additional info at WP:OP by other proxy checkers. -- DQ (t) (e) 02:46, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Letting anything at WP:OP solve itself there. No need to hold this. -- DQ (t) (e) 01:12, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]