![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/2a/Replacement_filing_cabinet.svg/40px-Replacement_filing_cabinet.svg.png) | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I, Abyssal, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Abyssal (talk) 12:17, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 20:41, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
I, Abyssal, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Abyssal (talk) 12:17, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 20:41, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
I, Erik, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 11:18, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 20:51, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
I, Ethakin, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ethakin (talk) 15:02, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 20:53, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Unnecessary cases raised for deletion in the case of what specific episodes in various shows used Outside Broadcast filming. Due to the lack of available information on the internet, books and audio-visual media, I have only been able to include a hypothetical and simplified summary of specific programs/ shows that used OB and what series/episodes and segments where OB filming was used. However I have been unfairly attacked, for claiming the information is inaccurate, as well as being challenged on the lack of external sources, where I have in fact included several sources to articles and web pages on the subject matter. I would therefore like to contest the case for the page's deletion. — — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goldmic90 (talk • contribs)
- @Goldmic90: The article hasn't been deleted yet. You can't ask for an undeletion of an article that is as yet not deleted. Also, as the AFD in question does not qualify as having "little or no participation", WP:REFUND is not an available option if the list is eventually deleted. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:19, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Well, now that it has been deleted....
Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of TV programs using outside broadcast (1950-90), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user JamesBWatson (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:09, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
I am a runner in the area and used to read the Wikipedia page for information. Scrolling through the relevant AfD, I accept why the page was deleted even though I personally disagreed. I would like to view a copy of it as a draft: articles for creation so I can improve the article and use as a template for creating other articles if I believe notability has been achieved. Nonsuchpark (talk) 22:24, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- You should ask the deleter user talk:Joe Roe Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:32, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- I will do that. Thanks Nonsuchpark (talk) 22:37, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted under U1. —Adam9007 (talk) 23:22, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Done ~ GB fan 23:29, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted under U1. —Adam9007 (talk) 23:23, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Done ~ GB fan 23:29, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —JC7V-constructive zone 22:34, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
It was deleted under G5 but that was ineligible because I made significant changes to the article after it was created , CSD G5 states 'and that have no substantial edits by others' but i did add a lot to the article and feel that the G5 criteria doesn't apply. Please undelete it and I will expand it with the help of another women in red member who has created a lot of recent significant articles. Thank you.JC7V-constructive zone 22:34, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- You should discuss this with the deleting admin, Beetstra. ~ GB fan 23:33, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Curious, I was under the impression that Special:Nuke did not delete pages that were edited by others and that I would need to do those manually. I'll undelete. --Dirk Beetstra T C 04:11, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Staymos (talk) 05:01, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
I, Dieter Mueller, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. —Dieter Mueller (talk) 05:44, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:16, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
I, Asiandramapop, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Asiandramapop (talk) 07:05, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
I still want to work on it. I have just been a bit busy. —Asiandramapop (talk) 07:06, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:18, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- [[:Maja Elliott]] · ( [[|talk]] | logs | [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Maja Elliott|links]] | [((fullurl:Maja Elliott|action=watch)) watch] ) · [[[Special:Undelete/Maja Elliott|revisions]]]
I, Softblackstars, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Softblackstars (talk) 11:02, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
I was sick and I couldn't continue editing the article —Softblackstars (talk) 11:03, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. note - personal communications are not suitable references Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:58, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted for lacking references, please userfy while I find some. —
chi (talk) 11:18, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Done restored but not userfied as it was a softdelete, it can be reversed.Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:01, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks. I asked for userfication because I'm not sure when I'll actually start working on it again. I'm hoping it doesn't get renominated in the meantime.
chi (talk) 13:07, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
I, Abyssal, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Abyssal (talk) 14:27, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 19:09, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
I, Cphweise, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cphweise (talk) 20:21, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:42, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
I, Marthadandridge, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Marthadandridge (talk) 16:47, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:53, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
notable draft —Marthadandridge (talk) 16:48, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:53, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
notable draft —Marthadandridge (talk) 16:48, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:53, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
notable draft —Marthadandridge (talk) 16:49, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:53, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
notable draft —Marthadandridge (talk) 16:50, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:53, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
notable draft —Marthadandridge (talk) 16:50, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:53, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
notable draft —Marthadandridge (talk) 16:51, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:53, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
G13 (don’t know if this draft is worth keeping or not) —Taku (talk) 21:40, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:56, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
G13 (no particularly reason to delete it, it seems. —Taku (talk) 21:42, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:57, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Nationchakma2 (talk) 22:00, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Article has many sources and contains notability of San diego Awards as well as national commercial links —72.207.22.249 (talk) 04:52, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. There is still pnly one source. Please add more if you have them/. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:01, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
New evidence. A search in google scholar of the second name the ferrolens is known as "Ferrocell" mentioned inside the article gives 31 instances. Therefore, primary reason in the Afd fro deletion thus "no independent sources referenced" can not be anymore sustained. Undelete and probably re edit and more independent sources. https://scholar.google.gr/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=ferrocell&btnG= Wloukram (talk) 18:48, 10 August 2018 (UTC) —Wloukram (talk) 18:48, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Not done DRV in progress. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:50, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- The sock is now blocked. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:06, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Was deleted instead of going through AFD process. Would like opportunity to improve it. Don't have copy and don't want to have to start completely again. Please restore if needed put it to draft while I work on it. —Cgrosvenor (talk) 21:42, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Seraphimblade: any objection to this being userfied? Hut 8.5 09:42, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Hut 8.5: No objection to that. I already told another editor I've no objection to recreation if it can be fixed. Seraphimblade Talk to me 10:20, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Done @Cgrosvenor: I've restored this to your userspace: User:Cgrosvenor/Scientists For EU. Please do not move it back to article space without addressing the problem which led to deletion, namely that it is promotional. If you do then it will be deleted again. Hut 8.5 15:09, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
links in footnotes were corrected to remove advertising, which was unintentional. this site is run by volunteers. Please restore site or tell us what we need to do. thank you. —2601:600:9C80:4FF2:9019:8C6F:816D:338 (talk) 19:18, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tatyana N. Mickushina, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user TonyBallioni (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.
- Also, I don't see where advertising was mentioned as a concern in the deletion discussion. —C.Fred (talk) 22:47, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Someone deliberately deleted it for malevolent purposes —Oopsimsorry (talk) 00:29, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
- No, it wasn't deleted for malevolent purposes, it was deleted as a result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/March 2012 North American heat wave. However, since it was closed as WP:SOFTDELETE, I have restored it.
Done. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:45, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
To use in Maradona (2018 film). —--Let There Be Sunshine 07:47, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
I, B dash, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. —B dash (talk) 04:42, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) KELiCHiA 02:26, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
- Are you looking for Draft:Smitti Boi? You have written quite a bit of deleted material also. So you will have to name it before it can be considered for restoral. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:48, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
I, Abyssal, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Abyssal (talk) 11:20, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 09:40, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
I, Abyssal, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Abyssal (talk) 11:21, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 09:41, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
I, JFilipeF, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. JFilipeF (talk) 12:04, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 09:42, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
This was a soft delete, which I'm a little surprised about. The DJ is still releasing material: https://www.residentadvisor.net/reviews/22078 and is still being mentioned in DJ news articles. A quick search for him on Google News returned several articles about him over the last 12 months. —Angryskies (talk) 13:40, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Done restored as a contested soft deletion. Ping User:Magnolia677 as the AfD nominator. Hut 8.5 09:45, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
i am still working on that article, i stopped due to work. Please,i like to continue now i am on break. —Hanngarbreal (talk) 17:57, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 09:52, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
user:Malcolmxl5 was the admin who deleted this at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wes Bellamy but has been inactive on ENWP for a month. I would like a WP:USERFIED copy of this to review. I have sources for this person and this person features in some other articles I am developing. I want to consider whether the sources I have could make a new case for notability. — Blue Rasberry (talk) 01:04, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Enough to be in an article submission. —209.52.88.102 (talk) 01:02, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Not done this draft was deleted as advertising and doesn't qualify for restoration here. You will need to ask the deleting administrator. Hut 8.5 10:00, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
I, Cmsnowden, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cmsnowden (talk) 13:38, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 17:04, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
I, APlatinium, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. APlatinium (talk) 16:38, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Restored edit history as draft has been recreated. Hut 8.5 17:05, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
The page has been deleted, but I don't know why? —2001:984:26D8:1:70C4:14AD:4D26:2E85 (talk) 17:20, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
- It was deleted because it hadn't been edited in any way, shape, or form for six months. G13 only applies to drafts that appear to have been abandoned. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:26, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
- We can restore it on request, are you asking for that? Hut 8.5 19:25, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Julie Bif (talk) 21:02, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
06:17, 8 August 2018 Fastily (talk | contribs) deleted page Draft:Graham Guest (G13: Abandoned draft or AfC submission – If you wish to retrieve it, please see WP:REFUND/G13) (thank)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. I restored Draft:Graham Guest. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:39, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
James McClatchey is an american who died 100-time, a record —77.136.204.116 (talk) 22:26, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Not done. No article by that name existed in main space, draft space, or the old AFC space. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:49, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
John is the current and long historical drummer for the rock bands "The Nixons" and "Seether". I believe Johns page (article) was deleted due to the lack of references. If so, that will be corrected immediately upon restoration of the page (article). Thank You —Musicdesignnet (talk) 23:25, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Musicdesignnet: The page isn't deleted, and it hasn't been deleted since June, when it was last restored. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:52, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
I, FaceFighter, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FaceFighter (talk) 08:41, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:20, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
I, Saradraskovic, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Saradraskovic (talk) 10:34, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:22, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
he was a former minister of telecommunication in Lebanon, and he was running for elections, i am his it administrator and i can prove the authenticity of this claim, we do not have a clear date when the page was deleted and by whom or what was the reason behind the deletion of the page —Mikelsfeir (talk) 10:49, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- I cannot find any deleted page in English. However these two pages exist: fr:Jean-Louis Cardahi, pl:Jean-Louis Kardahi. These and Wikidata never had a link to any English page on this person. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:29, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
These were moved to the draftspace and later deleted as part of the "Sander.v.Ginkel" cleanup, I'd like to be able to check/improve the articles, as they are notable per WP:NFOOTY. —S.A. Julio (talk) 03:43, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- well checking, ALL are woefully sourced so that nothing at all can be confirmed. They have one line of text with this template:, "xx xx (born 00 mmm yyyy) is a German women's former footballer. She was a member of the Germany women's national football team in nnnn, playing 1 match On club level she played for zzzzz " And a completely unsubstantiated infobox so it will be much better to start again from scratch with the lot. Actually use a source to get the information, and write with correct grammar. Out of all these there are only two references that could work: [1][2] Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:42, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
I, 109.65.10.63, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 109.65.10.63 (talk) 19:07, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:00, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
I, Ramesty, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ramesty (talk) 20:54, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:01, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Or Patricia_Teherán Romero. 2 articles existed at the same time, one was added by me, and another one by a now banned user. I redirected my version to the page by the banned user at request on my talk page. Please restore one of these. — » Shadowowl | talk 23:40, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Done. @Shadowowl: I ended up restoring the version that you originally wrote and later redirected: Patricia Teherán Romero. The other version was created by a sock puppet of a banned user, so I suppose I would prefer it if the contribution of the banned user stay deleted. Mz7 (talk) 04:13, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
I, AmanDhally, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. AmanDhally (talk) 03:54, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- @AmanDhally:
Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Mz7 (talk) 04:20, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —69.226.32.119 (talk) 05:09, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
I, SimonAartOosterman, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. SimonAartOosterman (talk) 05:34, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:34, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
I, 98.177.218.1, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 98.177.218.1 (talk) 06:20, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
I would like to work on this page more —98.177.218.1 (talk) 06:21, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:35, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
I, RomaBean, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. RomaBean (talk) 07:14, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Would like to keep working on this page please. —RomaBean (talk) 07:18, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:39, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
I, Mksharpe, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mksharpe (talk) 09:14, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
I would like more time to work on the page —Mksharpe (talk) 09:17, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ReaderofthePack (。◕‿◕。) 14:49, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
I, Ashleyliu, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ashleyliu (talk) 11:20, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- Ashleyliu, this was restored twice already (1, 2) and with any restoration there's the expectation that an article will be improved so that it will be accepted at AfC. The first time it was restored the article was worked on, the second time there was only a single edit. We need some sort of proof that the article will be worked on and that the company is notable enough to pass WP:NCORP. The draft looks to be predominantly sourced with WP:PRIMARY sources (things written by the company and/or people or organizations/businesses associated with them) and WP:TRIVIAL or routine things like database listings. To pass NCORP the company will need to have been the focus of in-depth, reliable sources that go beyond routine news coverage or primary sources. ReaderofthePack (。◕‿◕。) 14:44, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- Basically, we need proof that the business is notable, as drafts and "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Being successful isn't something that gives notability in and of itself and there have actually been billion dollar corporations that have failed NCORP - it's a pretty tough guideline to pass. ReaderofthePack (。◕‿◕。) 14:47, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Simakenett (talk) 17:19, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
The person is of great notability and has had one of the important role in the upbringing Malayalam movies —Rajeshsingri (talk) 14:25, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Not done Draft:Ousepachan Vaalakuzhy has no meaningful edit history, just a few redirects. This has been repeatedly deleted in mainspace as Ousepachan Vaalakuzhy but if you want to contest those deletions you'll need to talk to the deleting admin. Hut 8.5 21:07, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- Not to mention the only reason it was in mainspace in the first place was because the draft author moved it there intentionally, which in turn led to the AfD debate which led to its deletion. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:04, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
This is me and i want to write myself so that people can know me and my life. —Gsgaurav198 (talk) 23:41, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Gsgaurav198:
Not done, no substantive meaningful content to restore, and writing about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you must do so, then because you have a WP:conflict of interest about yourself, you must do it in your sandbox or in draft space and submit it for review via Wikipedia:Articles for creation. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:12, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
I, Yestonycope, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Yestonycope (talk) 17:40, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:25, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
The US Patent Office has recently published this item in its gazette. Therefore, it has been approved for use. button below —Govinsinghthind (talk) 18:24, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- Whether or not the US Patent Office has or has not done something is completely irrelevant to whether or not that item gets an article unless there's a serious controversy associated with their actions. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:42, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. We will need to see independent coverage of this brand before it will be accepted. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:28, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Simakenett (talk) 17:18, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
There are three recent papers to add to the original list of references. These provide evidence of the growing interest in Information Quality (InfoQ)
The links to these paper are:
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3183625
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/aic.16203
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351978918301392
For an interview of Professor Kenett explaining the importance of information quality see
https://www.jmp.com/en_us/events/ondemand/analytically-speaking/quality-assurance-in-the-golden-age-of-analytics.html
These links provide evidence for the growing importance of the information quality (InfoQ) framework described in the wikipedia item on it that was deleted. Please undelete it.
- The most recent deletion was an A3 (No meaningful content) deletion. A references list is not enough; the title also needs to have an actual encyclopaedic article written on it as well. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 17:57, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- The version deleted by user:Anthony Appleyard had more content, so perhaps you can ask for it to be made a draft, if you think you can prove that the topic is more than something you created yourself. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:24, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Dionne Maxwell (talk) 04:28, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Fatty Koo was a nationally recognized group signed to Sony/ Columbia records who released an album.
They have songs in movies such as: Fat Albert, Like Mike 2, and Yu-go-oh.
Miguel (the singer) also auditioned for the group on their BET reality tv show Blowin Up: Fatty Koo
Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatty Koo, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user MBisanz (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:58, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
I am asking for assistance to restore the page "David M. Schwartz (attorney)" that was speedily deleted on the basis that its content was a copyright violation based on this online page: http://gerstmanschwartz.com/partner-david-m-schwartz/ . However, it occured to me that the page of interest has been updated with a "Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0)" linked notice at the very bottom of that page. Therefore, the Wikipedia article text is NO longer a copyright violation. —Editorup2017 (talk) 08:03, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive_313#David M. Schwartz_(attorney). It looks like you have a COI declaration you need to make before you do any more editing here. See WP:PAID. --bonadea contributions talk 08:12, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
- And I should point out that, given the tone of the linked page, whether or not it would fall under G12 is academic, because a straight copy of the page would outright fail WP:CSD#G11 in any case. Wikipedia is not interested in ad copy. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 08:18, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
- If you add a CC-BY-SA-3.0 license then the BY bit says that attribution is required, so it is a good idea to specify the text of the attribution. Should it be Hudson Moon Productions, or Gerstman Schwartz Law. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:12, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
G13 (note also it is not an afc draft). —Taku (talk) 10:01, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:25, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Sanjacvetkovic (talk) 06:35, 14 August 2018 (UTC)Draft:Mitesh Dixit
(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Sanjacvetkovic (talk) 06:37, 14 August 2018 (UTC) Draft:Domain Office
- @Sanjacvetkovic: what do you want? there is draft:Domain Office and draft:Mitesh Dixit to chose from. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:38, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Graeme Bartlett and Graeme Bartlett: I want both pages - draft:Domain Office and draft:Mitesh Dixit to be restored so I can edit them and submit them for review. Thanks!
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Both restored. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:29, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
We would like to continue to work on the article and resubmit. —Jhoeltin (talk) 12:39, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:26, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
This page should not be speedily deleted because... all the information written here is my original work and the information has been referenced to original work in the reference list. you can have a look at all my social media profile to make sure all the information given here is correct and don't have any copyrights violation — Amani.jarrar (talk) 09:12, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Not done User:Amani.jarrar was not deleted as a copyright violation, but as content unsuitable to be hosted on Wikipedia. It looked to be a curriculum vitae, something that should appear on a University website, LinkedIn or ResearchGate, but not here. If you have contributed to writing Wikipedia pages then there would be some more leeway to write about yourself on your user page, but what was there was too much in any case. The appropriate amount of info would be what was in the "infobox person" - with photo and a phrase about yourself. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:18, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
- No! Not even "the appropriate amount of info"! User pages are for people who actually contribute to the encyclopedia and I suspect that Amani has no intention of doing that.
- Amani, cases of using Wikipedia as a free host do not come much worse than yours. Wikipedia is not Linkedin. When you become notable you may be confident that someone with no CoI will write about you in mainspace. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:25, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
I, SCD1965, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. SCD1965 (talk) 13:50, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:01, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
I, Haneulnaavi, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Haneulnaavi (talk) 16:52, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:03, 16 August 2018 (UTC)