This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 295 | Archive 296 | Archive 297 | Archive 298 | Archive 299 | Archive 300 | → | Archive 305 |
I, John hanley parc, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. John hanley parc (talk) 12:42, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
John hanley parc (talk) 12:42, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
Reason for deletion stated ambiguous advertising, G11? I hope to fix it so it falls in line with the rules. —Xeion (talk) 02:53, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
I, TheGarratt, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. TheGarratt (talk) 23:48, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
This was not a test page. As GKM variety currently does not exist, this draft page can be used to develop a mainspace article. —Taku (talk) 00:48, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
OK here was the content as written by the requestor:
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:51, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
I, 202.41.10.5, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 202.41.10.5 (talk) 03:52, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Allan V. Garcia 04:19, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Article had reliable sources —Rusboot (talk) 14:00, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Page has been deleted and restored previously, now for some reason deleted again —24.254.152.16 (talk) 22:01, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. —C.Fred (talk) 22:06, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
This page was previously deleted then restored. No log of when last deleted, by who, or reason. —24.254.152.16 (talk) 22:04, 8 March 2018 (UTC) Please Restore page.
I, Gwilks401, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Gwilks401 (talk) 16:47, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
The article does not say why it was deleted. If there was a problem with the content, something should have been posted so that those problems could be remedied and the content could be changed. —120.151.134.79 (talk) 22:17, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
((subst:refund|1= UCD American Football |2= Page had no right to be deleted, as the team still exists in Ireland and was to be updated by me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.17.206.206 (talk) 00:27, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —AdmiralNelson (talk) 02:22, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
Someone add sources in Chung eui Yong it no need for deletion it alright
I request to restore/undelete the article The Rinaldi Group. How can an article be deleted on the basis of only a single vote? Deleting the article without proper AFD discussion is very inappropriate. Please also consider that editor (user: Mattyjohn) who participated in the AFD is a non-active user, who merely have any contribution over Wikipedia. I was about to vote for keeping the article, but before that, the article was deleted. I believe the subject is notable and fulfills the Wikipedia's notability requirement. Also, the reason for nominating the article for deletion was just an opinion, and Wikipedia sees the facts, not an opinion. —Nausad Ahmed 15:33, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
I want to finish it, I forgot about it but an email reminded me, it is done, I just need to make some changes. —Matija Kordic (talk) 11:06, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
The company in question came into controversy in the same vein as the metoo hashtag. It is notable because it serves as an instance of a rather large company in the cosplay/steampunk community who ran multiple large events on the east coast having to deal with the founder being accused of misconduct, sexual and otherwise, which has already begun to resonate across the cosplay, comic-con, and steampunk event communities. —66.210.114.12 (talk) 20:23, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
I, Struway2, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Struway2 (talk) 20:40, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
See the comments at Draft talk:ESforce (moved from Draft:ESforce). The article should be undeleted and moved back to the draft namespace so that the author, MariaKR, can continue working on it. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 03:58, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 24.185.174.236 (talk) 06:23, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
Reliable sources were present —Rusboot (talk) 07:37, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
I intend to improve this draft to article-quality. —Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 15:48, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
Ready to continue updating. Deleted because draft wasn't updated in 6 months. Ready to finish project —Jrossduce (talk) 19:31, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —117.221.187.130 (talk) 11:28, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
This is a historical logo and would help to illustrate the history of Veolia Water Central with commentary. —Cloudbound (talk) 21:05, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
Dolores Cannon · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd | afd2 | afd3 ) · [revisions] ((subst:refund|1= Dolores Cannon |2= None of the administrators who deleted the Dolores Cannon page in 2013 have responded to repeated inquiries asking them to reconsider. Dolores Cannon died on October 18, 2014, and she deserves to have a page on Wikipedia that documents her life and achievements like any other author. This decision was made arbitrarily and in a discriminatory fashion, with obvious bias, and with incorrect information, including a claim that her books were all self-published. She wrote 19 books published by different publishing companies including Ozark Mountain Publishing. Her last two books, The Search for Hidden Sacred Knowledge (2014), and The Convoluted Universe: Book V (2015), where published posthumously by Ozark Mountain Publishing. Dolores Cannon was born on April 15, 1931 and died on October 18, 2014. Obituary: http://www.brashearsfuneralhome.net/obituary/2752170. Dolores Cannon's website: https://www.dolorescannon.com. The official website for Dolores Cannon's Quantum Healing Hypnosis Technique (QHHT): https://www.qhhtofficial.com. The popular website Collective Evolution has covered Dolores Cannon in several articles and interviews:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pkkMi1e-wB0&ab_channel=DoloresCannon
Dolores Cannon also appeared on Conscious Media Network which was later broadcast on Gaia TV, among many other TV appearances:
https://www.gaia.com/video/dolores-cannon-et-s-and-human-evolution
Dolores Cannon was and is a respected figure in the metaphysical community and New Age Movement and a pioneer of past life regression. If the editors who deleted this page have personal beliefs that do not accept metaphysical concepts that is irrelevant to the question at hand: Dolores Cannon was a real person, an author and metaphysical researcher, hypnotist and past life regressionist. These are facts. They do not require belief to be valid any more than one must believe in any religious figure including Jesus Christ, or the Christian faith. Her books exist and her QHHT method of hypnosis continues to be practiced and taught by an increasing number of people around the world today. Therefore we request this page be reinstated.
I, Panthersilea, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Panthersilea (talk) 01:42, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
I, Alarob, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I made the mistake of doing some work on the article in a text editor and not publishing them to Wikipedia. I'm amazed that I didn't get around to it for months! -- ℜob C. alias ALAROB 02:18, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
The article about Stephen Mbogo is back at that title, so the talk page should now be undeleted (possibly temporarily, as the article is currently under BLPPROD, and may have sources added later). —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:00, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
I, HansDelbrück, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. HansDelbrück (talk) 09:05, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted more than 10 years ago. Deleting editor has apparently disappeared. —Trackinfo (talk) 09:15, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Also request the undeletion of Operation: Weather Disaster (will merge them into the same article as they are two games in a series). Was deleted from the mainpage with edit summary "Undersourced, incubate in draftspace". I forgot these articles existed in my draftspace until they were deleted recently from being untouched. Would like another crack at getting it mainspace ready. —Coin945 (talk) 14:39, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
It is a clear violation of CSD G4/8! I have reviewed it and the subject is an icon of Ethiopian football, he is one of the youngest players ever to reach these merits and per relevance criteria is very-accepted for a note, It's bizarre it was deleted and I am expecting it to become put back ASAP, thank you. Per GNG he is notable CSD G8 require an identical text which it very was not. Please re-put the article ASAP... I via GNG request the article to be re-created and any bias in regards to former deletion is not ideal when notability is explained, I expect it to become re-input. The subject has received compliments from a nationality football president while coverage has been made in platforms such as TV, radio, magazines, and media, it is very clear coverage and via GNG he is at the very least acceptable. As mentioned I expect it to become re-published ASAP and at the very least the article sourcing could increase which wikipedians can do. Good day & best regards—Avaay (talk) 22:41, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
Just because one person couldn't find reliable sources doesn't mean that an article should be deleted. There was no real discussion on the subject matter. The article was swiftly deleted based off of a problem that could be easily fixed. There're reliable sources about and surrounding DAGames. You just have to look harder to find them. —Dannyyankee12 (talk) 20:22, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
I wish to keep working on the draft until all requirements are met for it to get published as an article —Nicolas.quintieri (talk) 22:40, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
(no text provided) Francois Weber (talk) 13:36, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Requesting for undeletion so that it may be improved with sources. Was deleted as a creation of blocked editor —✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 08:43, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Page was deleted for being a collation of unnotable delays and disruptions, and I intend to salvage the remaining content as a 'main page' for major events (such as Joo Koon rail accident, Nicoll Highway collapse and others). Also quoting what the nominator said "only the ones with articles are worth keeping" and most of the major one have or warrants an article. —1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 02:52, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
I, Najmusic, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Najmusic (talk) 18:04, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. —C.Fred (talk) 18:16, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
I, Pinballdot, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Pinballdot (talk) 14:06, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. —C.Fred (talk) 18:17, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
I, 78.196.197.214, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 78.196.197.214 (talk) 11:50, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
I, Fathoming, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Fathoming (talk) 05:18, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. —C.Fred (talk) 18:20, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
I, Cruz1016, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cruz1016 (talk) 18:59, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
—124.109.51.254 (talk) 08:59, 14 March 2018 (UTC) It was deleted due to link with website. It is an organizational website having authentic information about its people so please restore
i (It's a draft for editing so what's the problem ? I'm still working on it [references]) —Akesc (talk) 18:55, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
I, Andykay71, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Andykay71 (talk) 10:29, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
I, Patriciazsofia, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Patriciazsofia (talk) 13:30, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
I, 73.166.85.125, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 73.166.85.125 (talk) 05:16, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Recently AfD'd here: [2] I asked the closer to draftify the article to my user space here User_talk:Sandstein#Or so I could improve the article as mentioned in the AfD and they agreed. —SportingFlyer talk 06:03, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —PittsburghRangers (talk) 05:50, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
It was removed from Touch Chesi Chudu by an IP user without an edit summary. —--Kailash29792 (talk) 08:45, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi, this page about a local legend was AFD'd due to lack of sources, in June 2017. Later, a film on the same name Odiyan (2018 film) was created and was moved to Odiyan (film) and finally to Odiyan. So, could you restore the original deleted page into a draft or into my user page ? I would like to rework and recreate it as sufficient sources are available now. Thanks. —--Let There Be Sunshine 16:34, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
Someone deleted it —73.199.114.145 (talk) 18:41, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
My Draft is deleted —73.199.114.145 (talk) 18:40, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
notable musician with reliable sources —Rusboot (talk) 07:53, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Can the deleted page on At Boshoff please be userfied for me so I can keep editing it and keep adding 3rd party sources. —Mvnrsa (talk) 06:03, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) LuciaAnna (talk) 20:59, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
I, 96.255.83.58, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 96.255.83.58 (talk) 22:59, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
I, L7schwartz, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. L7schwartz (talk) 23:32, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Considering that Jungle Beat has been running since 2005, I highly doubt that it is not notable as claimed by the PRODder. Same for Sunrise Productions. —LaundryPizza03 (talk) 07:52, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
I, Jjjjjjdddddd, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 04:41, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
I, Khaledalwarea, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Khaledalwarea (talk) 13:02, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
I, Cmedits, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cmedits (talk) 09:44, 18 March 2018 (UTC) Cmedits (talk) 09:44, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
This is more like asking for opinions, as circumstances have changed regarding this website: it was added to the Library of Congress yesterday. This probably boosts the significance of the website in some way and therefore its case needs to be reconsidered, although I'm personally indifferent to the final decision. Thoughts? 88.182.48.88 (talk) 09:20, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
I, 178.49.152.66, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 178.49.152.66 (talk) 14:57, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
This article was deleted as a result of AfD a couple of months ago. It has been re-created, and it looks like it will pass AfD this time because Elbouzedi's soccer career has advanced. Is it appropriate to undelete and merge the deleted version for proper attribution? Thanks! —Jack N. Stock (talk) 17:27, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
For many years now I have repeatedly encountered people telling me they were surprised that there is no Human Design article on Wikipedia, typically after I tell them about itq and they do a little research on their own. I have probably been told by 10 or 15 different people how surprised they were that no Wikipedia article exists. I finally spent a couple hours today reading everything I could on this particular deletion and what I've found is that the previous Human Design System page was deleted via the Articles for Deletion (AFD) process but this page, "Human Design," was only deleted with reference to the previous AFD. So I am not sure how that fits in as to whether it should be added to Requests for Undeletion or whether it's a request for review. In any case, it's been about 9 years since the original page was deleted. Nothing has changed since then in terms of notability, although Human Design was notable then as well, as evinced by the plethora of books and websites about it as a topic. These are books and websites in many languages, all over the world, from authors who do not know each other, so it's not like it's just some small group who is studying and writing about this topic. On Feb 9 2009 the Human Design page was deleted with "No claim of notability." Then it was deleted again one year later for being about a group or company with no indication of the importance or significance. Deleted again for "unambiguous advertising" for listing a book written about it. I agree with this latter statement, that the book has no place in the article. What I would be interested in is a simple, factual description of what Human Design is, and its history. —fissionchips303 (talk) 22:24, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
I cannot read User:Mikemahalo/Human Design as it appears it was deleted. I assume it had zero useful content. I would be willing to write a couple paragraphs about the topic if it is notable. There are at least 6 threads on Quora asking for info about Human Design, with a lot of responses, and there are some authors (none of which I have found yet who have a Wikipedia page, so I suppose not notable authors) who have written about it both positively and negatively. For instance, Morten Tolboll is a published author who wrote a critique of it. But then, he is not notable enough for a Wikipedia entry so I'm not sure what that means for notability. I think it is kind of unfortunate how many people ask about it, and are obviously trying to find objective information, rather than simply trusting the proponents of it, but if it isn't notable then I suppose they can continue to wonder why Wikipedia has articles on things like "netflix and chill" but not something that literally thousands of people have spent 10s of thousands of hours studying. fissionchips303 (talk) 12:21, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
There was no need for the page to be deleted. The person in the article was sufficiently significant —Vipcarortann (talk) 05:19, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
The reason for deletion is not at all true. Currently I compete in Asia's top formula racing category called Asian Formula Renault Series. Please see wiki page 2018_Asian_Formula_Renault_Series. —Khracing96 (talk) 07:44, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
I, Pbsouthwood, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. · · · Peter (Southwood) (talk): 11:25, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Please undelete it and merge histories with Geoffrey James (journalist). - recently recreated and appars to have reasonable notability, for at least three things: The Tao of Programming, several other less famous books, and award-winning blog. Staszek Lem (talk) 21:38, 19 March 2018 (UTC) —Staszek Lem (talk) 21:38, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
I, ParmeetNijjar, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ParmeetNijjar (talk) 17:44, 19 March 2018 (UTC)