If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add ((Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Tecmobowl)) to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
|
- Code letter: F
- Supporting evidence:
Several months back, Jmfangio (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) was blocked as a sock puppet of the banned Techmobowl. Mrdrip showed up today and instantly started warring with Chrisjnelson (talk · contribs) over NFL Pro Bowl naming conventions. This was a key element of the dispute that was the subject of Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Jmfangio-Chrisjnelson. --B (talk) 17:43, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: I blocked Mrdrip as a sockpuppet of Tecmobowl (talk · contribs). I just came across the RFCU after seeing the user's talk page. Nishkid64 (talk) 23:18, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Does this mean the checkuser has been done or is the block based on edit patterns? --B (talk) 01:04, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The CheckUser has not been done. I based the block solely on the editing pattern. Nishkid64 (talk) 01:10, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Hmm ... I'd say it's about 75% that it's him, 20% that it's a reincarnation of someone else and 5% that it's a real new user. But I hope, in the off chance that 5% is right, we haven't succeeded in biting a newbie. --B (talk) 01:19, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The old guys are stale. Can you find the first CU operator and see if they saved the stats onto a hard drive? Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:29, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Clerk note: I have asked Morven if he has the old data from the Jmfangio-Tecmobowl CheckUser analysis he ran a few months back. Nishkid64 (talk) 02:37, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This is probably moot as it's been 11 days since the account has been indefblocked and he hasn't protested his innocence. But can someone record Mrdrip's data so that if/when he makes another sock, we can have something to check it against? --B (talk) 14:44, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It'll be in the checkuser logs from here now, and should be discoverable later. I think we can go for close on this one now - Alison ❤ 14:55, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Clerk note: Morven replied to my note on his talk page. He states that he could not find any records of the Tecmobowl CU request. Nishkid64 (talk) 07:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Has anyone asked Jpgordon? He made the first likely sock determination that largely contributed to Tecmobowl being community-banned in the first place. —Wknight94 (talk) 12:34, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Clerk note: [1] Jpgordon says he does not have any notes on the CU request. Nishkid64 (talk) 21:07, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
As described in this report on WP:ANI, Tecmobowl may have employed El redactor as an abusive sockpuppet to reinsert a link to his own website into an article while he was blocked. John254 07:29, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Clerk note: moving a discussion where user:El redactor denies being a sockpuppet to the talk page. Please keep the discussion there. -- lucasbfr talk 16:26, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Unrelated. Voice-of-All 05:01, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.