If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
((Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Subhash bose))
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Subhash bose[edit]

66.38.180.253 left a message on my talk page about "giving his love to my wife" which he signed "[User:RSudarshan]".[1][2]

RSudarshan is a sock puppet of Subhash bose as established by Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Subhash bose
CiteCop 20:51, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Subhash bose is currently blocked for incivility and the use of suspected sockpuppets. On his userpage it states that he "attends... The University of Texas" and lives in Austin, Texas. Recently, a new IP (User:128.83.131.139) began editing the same articles with the same editing pattern as Subhash bose. Like other IP's that are suspected sockpuppets of Subhash Bose, 128.83.131.139 traces to the University Of Texas At Austin. BhaiSaab talk 19:31, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Subhash bose contends that this is not his sockpuppet. I think it's pretty obvious that it is him trying to get around his currently blocked status. Please see User_talk:Subhash_bose#Sockpuppetry_case_2 for both his arguments and my arguments. BhaiSaab talk 02:01, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I do not believe User:66.38.180.253 is a sockpuppet of his, as that IP traces to "Canada - Quebec - Montreal - Cheppa Centreville Inc." BhaiSaab talk 02:04, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Subhash bose, Syiem and RSudarshan have all reverted to the same doubtful material either unsourced or of dubious source[3][4][5][6][7][8] that conflicts with reliable sources provided at Talk:Indian_nationalism#Zero

RSudarshan and Subhash bose have left the same message on the Talk Pages of various Users, including mine, on three separate occasions.[9][10][11]

RSudarshan appears to be a Wikipedia account created today, 21 August 2006, for the purpose of reverting to the aforementioned doubtful material, preceded by a brief message on Syiem's Talk Page to make it appear as if he's not a sock puppet.[12]
CiteCop 16:08, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No need to check; accounts have been blocked per evidence listed at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Subhash bose. IolakanaT 17:07, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
In fact, please do check. Subhash bose says that they are not related to him, despite numerous evidence against him.[13] Thanks, IolakanaT 20:13, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One more sock identified user:hkelkar.I would say go for checking all suspected socks.Holy|Warrior 09:55, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I followed contrib link to here. I think I have established with admins that I am nobody's sockpuppet. I defer you to Subhash bose's talk page

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Subhash_bose#Sockpuppetry_case_2

with link to the simultaneous chat session with admins (of which he kept a record).Hkelkar

In the link above Subhash tries to proove that they are not his sock .Are you admitting you are subhash????Holy|Warrior 10:53, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't put words in my mouth. bose and I have already PROVEN that we are neither sockpuppet nor sockpuppeteer (is that the right term?).Hkelkar 10:56, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Just because you say you're not a sockpuppet and Subhash says that you are not a sockpuppet, doesn't really make it true. As of now, I am requesting that people avoid editing this page for the time being, until there is a result here. Thanks, IolakanaT 11:08, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Inconclusive Mackensen (talk) 12:12, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.



If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
((Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Subhash bose))
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Subhash bose[edit]

Interchangeably edits userpages of his puppets. Bose is a self-confessed Islamophobiac (now under a week-long block) who has created these single-purpose accounts (Lkadvani created on 6th July [14], Pusyamitra created on 7th July [15]) for pushing fundamentalist POV. See [16] Anwar 14:44, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: While a checkuser will still come by to examine your request, you may get faster results at WP:AN or WP:AN/I. With obvious evidence to convince the administrators there, they will step in and deal with abusive sockpuppets. Kevin_b_er 01:24, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


 Possible. Pusyamitra Sunga is most likely 128.83.131.215. It is possible that Subhash bose is the same user as Pusyamitra Sunga, posting from another location in the same city. Lkadvani is completely unrelated; editing from an entirely different area of the world.Essjay (TalkConnect) 07:16, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.