If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
((Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Fangusu))
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Fangusu (5th)[edit]

Fangusu (4th)[edit]

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 14:14, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
 Confirmed. No sleepers found. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 19:19, 12 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Grazie. —Wknight94 (talk) 22:42, 12 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

These two appear to be the beginning of a new outbreak. The first is blocked, the second is not. Technical evidence of the second? Any more sleepers yet? —Wknight94 (talk) 04:03, 20 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Both  Confirmed. Also found LaraCroftTombRaiderFan (talk · contribs). Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 04:41, 20 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Clerk note: All blocked & tagged. Tiptoety talk 04:43, 20 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Fangusu (3rd)[edit]

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 14:59, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
 Confirmed. – Luna Santin (talk) 04:32, 28 November 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Adding a new user:

  • Yes, previous sleeper scans below have uncovered quite a few. —Wknight94 (talk) 03:43, 29 November 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Confirmed, same range; no obvious sleepers here, but will check back when I have some time. – Luna Santin (talk) 10:44, 30 November 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Fangusu (2nd)[edit]

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 02:25, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
  1. Rabbitkong (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  2. Pleaseunblockme (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  3. 3drealmsvsepicgames (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  4. Dukevsjazz (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Let's hope the rangeblock holds him down for the next few motnhs. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 03:23, 31 October 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Clerk note: Blocked & Tagged. Tiptoety talk 04:07, 31 October 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Fangusu[edit]

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 14:43, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
  1. Bookroom (talk · contribs)
  2. DaisyBunny (talk · contribs)
  3. Jkljkljkljkl (talk · contribs)
  4. KeeshaJubatus (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  5. KingLotor (talk · contribs)
  6. Kuriputo (talk · contribs)
  7. M2panchal (talk · contribs)
  8. Noogy (talk · contribs)
  9. Nwschk (talk · contribs)
  10. ReggaeRaccoon (talk · contribs)
  11. Sheelajaywant (talk · contribs)
  12. Sybariteone (talk · contribs)
  13. TigerStriper (talk · contribs)
  1. Ajmhatre (talk · contribs)
  2. Bm3456 (talk · contribs)
  3. Emergesenate (talk · contribs)
  4. Gaganjudge (talk · contribs)
  5. Malay92 (talk · contribs)
  6. Mnnandgaonkar (talk · contribs)
  7. Monish.gogri (talk · contribs)
  8. Mrinalthakkar (talk · contribs)
  9. Ram.nand (talk · contribs)
  10. Shaileshkiran (talk · contribs)
  11. Ushma2k (talk · contribs)

-- Avi (talk) 06:45, 19 October 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've blocked and tagged all in the likely list and will keep an eye on the possible list. Thanks! —Wknight94 (talk) 13:13, 19 October 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Confirmed FormidableFour is a sock too, I checked with Avi. — Rlevse • Talk • 14:50, 19 October 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Well, this is checkuser. Checkusers can see the IP address of every edit, etc. When they say "confirm", it means there is technical evidence that we aren't allowed to see but they can, and that evidence strongly links the user accounts together. —Wknight94 (talk) 22:47, 19 October 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oh, I got it. I thought someone was requesting that the listed usernames be checked to see if it's the same user, but the "likely" and "possible" lists are instead the results of the checkuser. Am I correct? --Icarus (Hi!) 03:20, 20 October 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes, that is correct. —Wknight94 (talk) 03:27, 20 October 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.


More