Egr[edit]

• Egr (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Malfunction (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Maxcap (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• BabuBhatt (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• 85.18.14.4 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

Multiple accounts that appear to me to be the same user. All involved in the same edit wars on the following pages, Rapcore, Limp Bizkit, and Fred Durst, two of which have been protected. With the exception of Egr and 85.18.14.4 all the users only edit on articles involved in the edit war.

• many 3RR from 85.18.14.4

[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]

• many 3RR from Egr

[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]

• many 3RR from Malfunction (This user have almost 100% edits-reverts)

[34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40]

• See history: [41], [42], [43]. Please see: [44]

• and vandalism: [45], [46], [47], [48], [49] and [50], [51] etc...

• It looks as if this is idem - Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/LUCPOL. Two users (Egr, Lucpol) and varied sentence (Egr - a'la metal, Lucpol - a'la hip-hop). LUCPOL 22:59, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On a purely cursory check, it appears that this is nothing more than a retaliation for Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/LUCPOL. If you check the earliest contributions of Maxcap, BabuBhatt, and Egr, they all appear to be longstanding users with no signs of obvious sockpuppetry. This RFCU doesn't seem like much more than fishing. alphaChimp^(talk) 16:03, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And what from Malfunction? This is obvious glove puppet (on 101%). After for this Egr / IP smashed principle 3RR many times, that even I (supposedly [52]: Hans Schwarc, John Amber) with help 2 glove puppets and I received for 3RR block so. This is the Wikipedia the pathology - a lot of administrators and the injustice further is. LUCPOL 09:34, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please give up accusing me and defending your sockpuppets, Lucpol. Neither Malfunction is a sockpuppet by mine, some of his contribs (precisely on Staind, Post-grunge, Dani Filth and List of heavy metal bands) do not absolutely relate to me. Your accusation is completely false, and denotes your clearly bad faith. -- Egr (talk), 9/11/2006

You make a mistake. Accused me so it is well, and accused you it - is bad. Both had our reverts, both know also that User:Malfunction is glove puppet. PS. Please give up accusing me and defending your sockpuppets, Egr. LUCPOL 12:02, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How many times must I remember to you that I DON'T USE SOCKPUPPETS??? I edit only by MY username, Malfunction, Maxcap and Babubhatt are the ones for other users. Maybe do you need my portrait and the ones for thar three you continue to accuse? Only YOU are using sockpuppets. -- Egr (talk), 9/11/2006

What to tell here a lot of you - make a mistake. LUCPOL 14:32, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is an obvious case for rejection but I'll go one further and state that these accounts are completely  Unrelated. Move along. Mackensen (talk) 15:10, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]