If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
((Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/70.108.49.31))
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

70.108.49.31[edit]

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 20:34, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

70.108.49.31 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
136.242.180.140 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

Code letter: G.

I don't feel this warrants a block, but definately a warning. I suspect that these two are the same person because they only care about the same issue(s), they both do not sign their names, and if they do it is done the same way, and both have had to be reverted because of non-conformity and refusal to learn how to edit in the wikipedia community. --Maniwar (talk) 20:34, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you already know the IP addresses involved, what can a checkuser do? – Luna Santin (talk) 21:54, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I asked the question of where to report when I suspect two IP's to be the same person (here) and the answer I was given (here) was to place it at Checkuser. If this is not the correct place I apologize and ask that you point me in the right direction. Thanks! --Maniwar (talk) 23:22, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted The best thing I can come up with is [1] [2]. I will just delist this now. Funpika 11:44, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.