After considering /Evidence and discussing proposals with other Arbitrators, parties and others at /Workshop, Arbitrators may place proposals which are ready for voting here. Arbitrators should vote for or against each point or abstain. Only items that receive a majority "support" vote will be passed. Conditional votes for or against and abstentions should be explained by the Arbitrator before or after his/her time-stamped signature. For example, an Arbitrator can state that she/he would only favor a particular remedy based on whether or not another remedy/remedies were passed. Only Arbitrators or Clerks should edit this page; non-Arbitrators may comment on the talk page.
For this case, there are 13 active Arbitrators, so 7 votes are a majority.
Place those on /Workshop. Motions which are accepted for consideration and which require a vote will be placed here by the Arbitrators for voting.
Motions have the same majority for passage as the final decision.
1) R. fiend, the subject of this case, has indicated that he will resign as an administrator, thereby resolving the main issue raised by this case, if the case will then be closed. Accordingly, this case is suspended for a period of 72 hours from the adoption of this motion. If R. fiend is voluntarily desysopped during that period, this case will be automatically closed without need for a further motion or proceedings and with the following determination:
If R. fiend does not resign his adminship within 72 hours after this motion is adopted, the case will resume and this motion will have no further effect.
Adopted on 22:39, 13 January 2008 (UTC).
Four net "support" votes needed to pass (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first vote is normally the fastest an injunction will be imposed.
1) {text of proposed orders}
1) {text of proposed principle}
2) {text of proposed principle}
3) {text of proposed principle}
4) {text of proposed principle}
5) {text of proposed principle}
6) {text of proposed principle}
7) {text of proposed principle}
8) {text of proposed principle}
9) {text of proposed principle}
10) {text of proposed principle}
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
2) {text of proposed finding of fact}
3) {text of proposed finding of fact}
4) {text of proposed finding of fact}
5) {text of proposed finding of fact}
6) {text of proposed finding of fact}
7) {text of proposed finding of fact}
8) {text of proposed finding of fact}
9) {text of proposed finding of fact}
10) {text of proposed finding of fact}
11) {text of proposed finding of fact}
Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.
1) {text of proposed remedy}
2) {text of proposed remedy}
3) {text of proposed remedy}
4) {text of proposed remedy}
5) {text of proposed remedy}
6) {text of proposed remedy}
7) {text of proposed remedy}
8) {text of proposed remedy}
9) {text of proposed remedy}
10) {text of proposed remedy}
11) {text of proposed remedy}
12) {text of proposed remedy}
13) {text of proposed remedy}
1) {text of proposed enforcement}
1) {text of proposed enforcement}
2) {text of proposed enforcement}
3) {text of proposed enforcement}
4) {text of proposed enforcement}
Clerks and Arbitrators should use this section to clarify their understanding of the final decision--at a minimum, a list of items that have passed. Additionally, a list of which remedies are conditional on others (for instance a ban that should only be implemented if a mentorship should fail), and so on. Arbitrators should not pass the motion until they are satisfied with the implementation notes.
Four net "support" votes needed to close case (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first motion is normally the fastest a case will close.