"MT25i" not mentioned at the target. The letters "MT" are never said together, and the number "25" is not present anywhere at the page. This may be a model number, but it's unclear how useful of a redirect this is as the title is never mentioned as a synonym. Utopes(talk / cont) 23:23, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:40, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Related mem; not mentioned in page or anywhere else on wikipedia. Rusalkii (talk) 23:19, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Remove:clearly unrelated and not appropiate.--ReyHahn (talk) 00:24, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - IIRC, this meme phrase was put over a (large?) number of different videos and gifs from multiple franchises (my memory says kirby, freespace, and more). If we don't have an article on the meme itself due to lack of notability, then this meme has no real unambiguous target, and should be removed. Fieari (talk) 07:24, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete IIRC, the original meme featured Cell from Dragon Ball Z. That said, that's not saying we should keep, I otherwise fully agree with you, nom, and ReyHahn. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 15:36, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are about 6 articles linking to Pierre Connes, the problem is that the article currently leads to Janine Connes, his wife. It would be better to either take the time to create the article (I am not up to it), or just delete the redirect so that the red link appears. An ((ill)) template has been put in place in the concerning articles if the redirect gets deleted. ReyHahn (talk) 22:55, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Meme not mentioned in page. Section isn't about the meme or even the commercial the meme is from, but a related blog marketing campaign. Note that this is by a user who has created a number of recently-nominated redirects. Rusalkii (talk) 21:45, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment:This redirect is a quote from Kitchen Gun, a parody of the Cillit Bang marketing campaign that is mentioned in the Wait no, scratch that, this isn't the Kitchen Gun meme- it's the slogan from this ACTUAL ad for Cillit Bang. Shows how familiar I am with Cillit Bang's advertisements, lol. In any case, what I do find odd is that that section is... honestly rather confused? It's titled as if it's all about the viral marketing controversy, starts out talking about the television ad campaign instead, switches gears and talks about the viral marketing, then switches gears AGAIN to suddenly talk about Kitchen Gun, which is inspired by the television ads, not the blog. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 00:03, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Search results are various companies non of which are mentioned onwiki. Unlikely & confusing error. Rusalkii (talk) 21:43, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I can imagine someone unfamiliar with the Geordie accent mishearing "stalemate" spoken in that accent as "steelmate", but we can't cater for every possible error of this type. To borrow the language used in discussions of WP:RFOREIGN redirects, the subject has no particular affinity to the north east of England so that doesn't provide a basis to keep this redirect and I can't find any other. Thryduulf (talk) 01:51, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Would Template:Db-xfd apply here? Consensus has already established that there's no info on this lake; might not need to go through song and dance for another week if it's avoidable. Utopes(talk / cont) 21:57, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not mentioned at target article. Originally was a redirect to Muppet Theory, which was BLAR'd as a non-notable neologism, leaving this redirect without a home and undiscussed at the current target page. Utopes(talk / cont) 20:51, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Roguevania is not mentioned anywhere at the target page, although the concept does receive a smatter of mentions across different other games' articles. Only usage of "vania" is talking about Deadcells being a roguelike / metroidvania, but not a combination of these two terms. Utopes(talk / cont) 20:39, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A game-genre neologism which is not mentioned at the target article. Is only mentioned once on Wikipedia (but would likely be inappropriate to redirect a concept to one usage of such concept). Dark Souls is mentioned as being "loosely considered a Metroidvania", and Soulslike is listed in the see also section. However, the subsection that this redirect was initially pointed to no longer exists, so it does not seem as if this redirect has a great use anymore if the concept is not discussed anywhere else. Utopes(talk / cont) 20:37, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Allegedly a TV drama, which is not listed at the target article, nor anywhere on Wikipedia. We have no content for this topic. Utopes(talk / cont) 20:33, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This war was not 25 years. This title does not appear anywhere at the target page, and is confusable with The 25 Year War. Utopes(talk / cont) 20:25, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It looks like the phrase probably originated with this article. There is a Russian Twenty-five Years' War which redirects to Livonian War, whose dates more closely align with those given in the article. Still, neither term doesn't appear to be a commonly-used synonym. (Most of the Google hits seem to be random instances where "twenty-five years" and "war" appear close together). There doesn't seem to be enough here to warrant keeping the redirect. - Presidentmantalk · contribs (Talkback) 21:31, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've been getting very tripped-up with this redirect, but I feel this title can easily (and more likely) be used for Marching band, which is, by nature, a band. The page for Marching band has the disambiguation page linked to access other uses. But technically speaking, a marching band is still a band. (This reminds me of the Climber (climbing) situation...) Utopes(talk / cont) 20:23, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:DIFFCAPS. The duo is the only musical group the on the disambiguation page, and the term would be a WP:PTM for any article about an individual marching band. If we need to provide more clarity, we could add a hatnote pointing to the List of marching bands on the article about the duo. - Eureka Lott 20:58, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For what it's worth about the diffcaps, Marching Band is also a redirect to Marching band. With that in mind it seems as if Marching Band (band) and Marching band (band) would hypothetically be on a level playing field, if the two (band)less versions are currently considered the same, I'd think. Utopes(talk / cont) 21:07, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This is the only article we have about a band called "Marching Band". Thryduulf (talk) 21:16, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is a group that used to be, but is no longer mentioned at the target article, and not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia. Currently unhelpful redirect as we don't have any material on this subject. Utopes(talk / cont) 20:10, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is a weird case. The only reason this page exists is due to the creator working around the Raman Raheja title salt. The base name had been speedily deleted 3 times for A7 and G11, and this variant title lasted less than 24 hours as an article, before being WP:BLAR'd into the cricket league. Because there is only a passing mention of Raheja at the target, and no indication that Raheja is an entrepreneur, this redirect does not seem very useful without any content about Raheja being an entrepreneur at the cricket league page. Utopes(talk / cont) 20:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
2020–2023 global chip shortage
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was wrong venue. Per the instructions, if you want to move a page but a redirect is in the way, do not list it here. Place a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests. Thryduulf (talk) 21:20, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This redirect should be deleted so its target article can be moved back under its title. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 19:54, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Nominating for deletion. The redirect is overly specific and too long and is therefore an unlikely search term. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 19:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:
Close I didn't realise that their had already been a previous discussion on this redirect, I was kind of tired when I nominated it and forgot to check. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 10:04, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:RDEL#D8. It should have been speedied under WP:A10 in November instead of being converted to a redirect. - Eureka Lott 19:23, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. "Dis" is not a common abbreviation for "disambiguation". Thryduulf (talk) 19:24, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect went to a different party (that in turn was an early name for yet another party in a WP:FORK). An article is possible, so WP:R#DELETE #10. Викидим (talk) 19:01, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect went to a different party (that in turn was an early name for yet another party in a WP:FORK). An article is possible, so WP:R#DELETE #10. Викидим (talk) 18:53, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not mentioned in redirected article. GnocchiFan (talk) 16:43, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Budweiser#Marketing. It would be more appropriate to redirect to the drink that the mascot ("Bud Man") is advertising, rather than the company that produces the drink. Also the Marketing section contains some information on this mascot. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 10:02, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
2024 conspiracy theories, speculation and controversy surrounding the health, period of convalescence, public absence and Mother's Day photograph of Catherine, Princess of Wales; or, Where is Kate? (Kategate)
2024 conspiracy theories, speculation and controversy surrounding the health, period of convalescence, public absence and Mother's Day photograph of Catherine, Princess of Wales; or, Where is Kate? (Kategate) → Where is Kate?(talk ·links·history·stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
this title is way too long for a redirect, thank you Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:29, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as an implausible search term, created from a humorous alternative title suggestion at the target talk page. See also the redirect 2023 Mother's Day photograph by Catherine, Princess of Wales, created by the same user. IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 13:41, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Simply being long is not a reason to delete, but it being an implausible amalgam of several titles is. Thryduulf (talk) 19:25, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Haha. Admittedly very funny, but delete. Tim O'Doherty (talk) 20:31, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, and as an implausible and unlikely search term. Rusty4321talkcontribs 22:08, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Voz is dos" is "what is it?" in Yiddish. There is a Yiddish song with this title, not mentioned in the target article. Article about the song can be created, so WP:R#DELETE #10. Викидим (talk) 09:01, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The exclamation mark at the end appears to be not used by Watterson. Revenge of the Baby-Sat is already present as a redirect. Most likely, a typo by the editor. Викидим (talk) 08:56, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It's a plausible error, especially as multiple other books/stories in the series do end with exclamation marks. Thryduulf (talk) 12:40, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Very plausible error. Easy to remember the names of the books, not so easy to remember the presence of punctuation or not. Fieari (talk) 01:33, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Misspelling reflecting mispronunciation by Calvin in a single strip of the comics. Calvin wears a snorkeling mask with water in it. Highly improbable to occur in internet searches for Calvin and Hobbes. Викидим (talk) 08:49, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per nom. Fieari (talk) 01:38, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This redirect should be deleted mainly because as was said last time, shootings in Kansas City are frequent, including one literally today. The Super Bowl parade shooting IMO should just be merged into Super Bowl LVIII#Aftermath because gun violence is an everyday occurance in America and one fatality is not notable enough for an article, but I digress. In any case, this is clearly not the most notable shooting of the name, and it being so high in the search results and not the Kansas City massacre is clearly WP:RECENTISM. 134.6.74.198 (talk) 20:38, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I understand an RM is underway for this article, but that being said, I feel that that shouldn’t impact this given how this is not a suggested name (I don’t think) and there have been RMs for this article since the day it happened. --134.6.74.198 (talk) 20:40, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The last discussion closed just two weeks ago, and there was strong consensus to keep. I find it highly unlikely that consensus has changed in such a short timeframe. - Presidentmantalk · contribs (Talkback) 21:37, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak disambig A very rough search suggests that about half the current google results for "Kansas city shooting" are for the 2024 parade shooting. (Compare a search for "Kansas city shooting" and "Kansas city shooting" -parade -"Super Bowl". This seems suggestive that it's the primary topic, given that the remaining half is divided up between several different topics, but not overwhelming. Other shootings that have pages that might be referred to as such include Shooting of Ralph Yarl, Overland Park Jewish Community Center shooting, and the above-mentioned Kansas City massacre. I would support creating a disambig page and targeting there, but in the absence of such a page this target seems more helpful than deletion. That being said, re-opening discussion so soon after previous discussion closed seems to be in bad form. Rusalkii (talk) 04:42, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Reply - Agree that "re-opening discussion so soon after previous discussion closed seems to be in bad form". --Jax 0677 (talk) 21:16, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WP:TROUT nom for reopening discussions so soon, then either Keep as per previous discussions, or Dabify as per Rusalkii. (For the record, I'm leaning towards Keep, as it's the result of the previous discussion.) 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 05:21, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and trout - Right on! --Jax 0677 (talk) 21:13, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as far as I can tell nothing has changed in the last 2 weeks. Thryduulf (talk) 12:23, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Right on! --Jax 0677 (talk) 21:14, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Dabify as per Rusalkii. This knee-jerk redirect is obviously nonsense, as the nominator said. — Smuckola(talk) 14:51, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion two weeks ago presented evidence that showed this is not nonsense. What has changed since then to make it "obviously nonsense" now? Thryduulf (talk) 19:06, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong dabify. More than one Kansas City shooting. In fact, there've been hundreds of shootings; while we might not have articles for all of the hundreds, the ones we do have articles for still fare pretty highly pageview wise, and regularly contend with 2024 event even with its WP:RECENTISM bonus. [1] Redirecting this umbrella term for one shooting in an entire major city is wholly unhelpful and obscures the other notable shootings that people may have been searching for. Utopes(talk / cont) 00:45, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoristalk! 00:56, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Would it really be helpful to send readers looking for encyclopedic content, to an unfamiliar page such as a category? This would be a deviation from the norm of, say, Chicago shooting or Nashville shooting among multiple others. The category can be linked from the hypothetical DAB if it needs to. Utopes(talk / cont) 23:14, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I oppose this - we have an article on the exact event the significant majority of people are going to be looking for (the current target, yes it's recent but that doesn't mean it's not the primary topic) that has a hatnote to the event most other people are going to be looking for. Retargetting to a category that is much broader and which doesn't help people who don't know that the Kansas City massacre was a shooting is actively unhelpful. Thryduulf (talk) 04:41, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I've drafted a disambig page at the target. Utopes(talk / cont) 00:50, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: There is a disambiguation draft at the redirect page now. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 07:08, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have just checked again, and it is even more clear that the current target is the primary topic now than it was when this was last discussed - 100% of the results on the first five pages of my google search are about the 2024 event. The draft dab should be at Kansas City shooting (disambiguation). Thryduulf (talk) 12:44, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Hatnote to Disambiguation - It really does seem the 2024 shooting is the main topic here, but it might not always be the main topic... and clearly it wasn't always the main topic previously, so searching based on historical references might be misleading. Because it's the main topic RIGHT NOW, the redirect should probably stay where it is, but there should be a hatnote pointing to a separate disambiguation page. Fieari (talk) 01:45, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I know we just had a discussion for List of Cops episodes (and I participated in the respective discussion), but I made my comment in that discussion prior to noticing the existence of List of COPS episodes. The problem here is that WP:SMALLDETAILS probably does not differentiate the two topics enough, given that Cops (TV program) can be stylized as "COPS" and COPS (animated TV series) is apparently stylized as "C.O.P.S.". In addition, at Cop#Television, there are additional TV show/program subjects listed which include an inline list of episodes. So, with all that said, I'm not sure what is the best path here. (I've also added List of C.O.P.S. episodes for completion of this nomination so others know of its existence, but I'm "weak keep" on that per my previous statement about the "C.O.P.S." stylization; either way, List of C.O.P.S. episodes is a ((R with history)).) Steel1943 (talk) 18:18, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Disambiguate with hatnotes at the target sections. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:02, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting for a stronger consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoristalk! 04:18, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator comment: At the minimum, I think List of COPS episodes should be retargeted to Cops (TV program)#Episodes per the "COPS" confusion and since the show with 30+ seasons is significantly more notable than a show which aired for one season almost 40 years ago. Steel1943 (talk) 04:54, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to dab page. Create a list of episode redirect for each series using their main article title and disambiguation. Gonnym (talk) 10:34, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 15:41, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all per Shhh and hatnote (which I have already done). I would see "List of COPS episodes" with only the COPS capitalized going to the COPS animated series. Jay 💬 17:12, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is not clear what you are suggesting with should be further disambiguated, but the TV program was titled with caps earlier (see Talk:Cops (TV program)/Archive 1#Why is this article titled COPS (TV series) instead of Cops (TV series)?), and was moved to the lowercase by RHaworth in 2012, probably boldly. However, after going through the discussions, and leaning towards to stylization, I see merit in nom's minimum requirement of list of COPS going to Cops, hence striking off my vote. Jay 💬 05:09, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think Cops (TV program) should be moved to Cops (1989 TV program), with Cops (TV program) and Cops (TV series) and COPS (TV series) going to Cop#Television. If that was done I would support targeting the first three redirects to Cop#Television as well. I also know that that move proposal won't get consensus, so am just ranting about it here rather than actually filing a RM. In the mean time, though, my initial logic applies. And I've fixed the link above. * Pppery *it has begun... 05:32, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Thoughts on Pppery's suggestion? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes(talk / cont) 05:31, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Gillanwali (Dera Baba Nanak))
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. CSD G6 LizRead!Talk! 08:08, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unlikely extra trailing parenthetical, at this title for under an hour. Rusalkii (talk) 04:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per G6; a redirect left behind from moving a page which was created at an incorrect title. Utopes(talk / cont) 04:52, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Following the closure of the Minecrat RfD with a deletion result, the last and WP:POINTiest outcome of that discussion I'd expect to see is the mass creation of all other variations of this deleted redirect. Creating redirects for every typo-instance of a word pre-emptively, especially a week after the deletion of the last one, is not useful. Minecraft is not hard to spell; these redirects don't provide any benefit besides clogging technical pages (not a benefit). Utopes(talk / cont) 03:58, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all as unlikely typos and per previous RfD. Unnecessary maintenance. — HELLKNOWZ∣TALK 09:36, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all, these redirects are unnecessary. Suonii180 (talk) 11:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. I'd have R3ed these if I'd seen them as these are not plausible typos in the way we use that term. Thryduulf (talk) 12:46, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above and suggest to I am RedoStone that they take a break from creating redirect altogether, their record is not great and this sort of passive-aggressive redirect creation is not a good look re:ability to take a hint. Rusalkii (talk) 18:48, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are hundreds of different ways to interpret being sick, with a massive list of symptoms and/or other characteristics to choose from. Taking this hyper-generic phrase and targeting at one outcome of being sick, is not helpful as a redirect. Utopes(talk / cont) 03:46, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Being sick" is a euphemism for vomiting, so the current target does make sense. See wikt:be sick. - Eureka Lott 17:32, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Mixed feelings here. The first few Google results are all for vomiting, but then again the first Google results for Apple are the company. Inclined towards retarget to Sick#Medical conditions per Thryduulf, but not strongly opposed to current target either. Rusalkii (talk) 18:52, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to the dab at Sick#Medical conditions, I agree that vomiting is the most common meaning of this phrase, but it's not the ONLY meaning, and so the dab is appropriate. You could suggest a hatnote, but I think that would be clutter, and just retargetting to the dab is a much better idea. Fieari (talk) 07:31, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I see only a loose connection between this redirect and the target article. There is a link with the Cadenheads but "old raj"? But I might not be up on lingo for distilleries. I came upon this redirect, one of many created by this editor while tagging some of their category creations. LizRead!Talk! 03:13, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete google results make it clear that (Cadenhead's) Old Raj is a gin bottled by Cadenhead's. The only connection is that Cadenhead's is owned by J & A Mitchell & Company, who also own the target distillery, but there is no information about this product at the target (and there shouldn't be) or anywhere else on Wikipedia (I have no opinion whether there should be) making the redirect unhelpful. Thryduulf (talk) 12:58, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No mention of "Bagel" anywhere at the target article, no mention of this particular offshoot character anywhere on Wikipedia, apart from a contextless one-off name-drop in the Fred: The Show cast. Utopes(talk / cont) 02:49, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure why this was created as it seems implausible that anyone would ever make that typo (Puyallup Reservation > Puyallup Resvn), "Resvn" isn't any slang I know, and nothing links to it, so I feel like it should be deleted. I would have marked it for speedy deletion but it's been around for two years. The only edit besides its creation was from a bot fixing a double redirect a few months ago. PersusjCP (talk) 02:33, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Agree that this is an extremely unlikely typo. Yuchitown (talk) 02:46, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Yuchitown[reply]
Keep This is not a typo but an abbreviation used on maps, directories, etc (especially paper ones) where space is limited in the same way many other geographical features are making it a highly plausible search term. As an example of use see this US Census map. Indeed I see a different map was cited in the creation edit summary, so I'm not sure what sort of BEFORE the nominator did. Thryduulf (talk) 02:54, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close. Discussion taking place about whether to include this nickname, which the existence of this redirect is tied to. (non-admin closure)Utopes(talk / cont) 02:58, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A non-neutral nickname which is not discussed at the target list of nicknames. Utopes(talk / cont) 02:16, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It was removed from the list with the rationale "WP:BLP violation seems to imply that Biden did genocide" by @Isla despite having a copious amount of sources pointing to its usage. I restored the mention of the nickname. The fact that it's pejorative is irrelevant- most of the nicknames there are. HadesTTW (he/him • talk) 02:27, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What is relevant is that it's not mentioned at the target. Was simply setting the stage on what the redirect is, a non-neutral nickname, often deletable via WP:RFD#DELETE reason #3. It seems that this was unfortunately poor timed on my part as there was a talk page discussion deciding on whether or not to include this nickname at the target list, which was dormant until a couple hours before this RfD. No need to split the discussion between here and the talk page; as this seems to be a content debate, I'll be closing this. Utopes(talk / cont) 02:57, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Hasya Movies or "Hasya" not mentioned at the target article, unclear connection to subject based on article contents, external searches did not show Razesh. Utopes(talk / cont) 02:05, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The word "delete" is only mentioned once in passing, never with an exclamation point, and never referred to as a possible chant of such word. Because the word "delete" is very often stated on its own, as a command verb, this stylization I feel can be used in many other contexts present on the Delete disambiguation page. There is currently not a strong justification from the Cyberman article's content to prioritize this usage over the others. Utopes(talk / cont) 01:48, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
IIRC there is at least one episode of Doctor Who, possibly "Rise of the Cybermen", where the Cybermen use the imperative "Delete!" in much the same way that Daleks say "Exterminate!" in other episodes. But there is no mention of it in our article Cyberman. So Retarget to Deletion (the current destination of Delete). --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 10:50, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Youtube does indeed have a couple instances of this, with the two scenes I linked coming from "Rise of the Cybermen" and (I *believe* given it depicts Cybermen being pitted against Daleks) "Doomsday". That said, it shows up a lot less compared to the Dalek's cry to Exterminate!, presumably due to either A.) it only showing up in the newer series, potentially as a deliberate parallel to Exterminate!, and/or B.) the Cybermen themselves being a lot less interested in flat-out extermination, wanting instead to assimilate populations into the Cybermen. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 14:44, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per WP:PANDORA, way too vague to be a viable redirect. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 16:44, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to Deletion per Redrose. I explicitly do not endorse the WP:PANDORA rationale because, just like pretty much every other WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:CRYSTAL-based !vote it is not relevant to the discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 18:01, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
An r from meme catchphrase, not mentioned at the target article. Wikipedia is not a compository of meme-to-source redirect connections. Utopes(talk / cont) 01:43, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as much as I like this meme fountain of a game, en.wiki is not an indiscriminate collection of memes. --Lenticel(talk) 13:45, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Even the article on Senator Armstrong (Metal Gear) doesn't mention the quote, which is surprising. But, it indicates that this should be deleted until such time that information is integrated somewhere. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 16:42, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A catchphrase that is not discussed at the target article. Searching for this specific quote instead of the service itself is an intentional decision that should be reflected in content, but is not present. Utopes(talk / cont) 01:42, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The word "wow" is not mentioned at the target, much less "wowee", also not mentioned. I find it extremely far-fetched to believe that people would search for Mario by typing in "wowee" instead of "Mario". For people that would make the decision to use the phrase "wowee", it would seem expectable to have some content about the phrase "wowee" as a target, which we do not have on Wikipedia. There's plenty of other mentions of "wowee" across Wikipedia; it could be worthwhile to delete this and let the Wikipedia search do it's thing. Utopes(talk / cont) 01:31, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No idea what this is supposed to mean. Sergecross73msg me 02:02, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A couple of days ago Facebook decided to show me a video where someone had replaced the "woo-hoo"s in Song 2 with vaguely similar noises from a Mario game (that weren't really that similar to my ears). It wouldn't surprise me if this was part of a similar meme or something, even if so that is far from the only reason someone might search this and we don't have any useful information for people who are looking for that. Thryduulf (talk) 02:46, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Dunno about anyone else, but when I see this collection of letters, the first thought that goes through my mind is definitely NOT Mario. Heck, my mind brings up some fics from the SCP Foundation before it brings up Mario. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 14:54, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Chasing" is also not mentioned at the target, which I would've expected Chasing Waterfalls more if anything. Utopes(talk / cont) 01:45, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, that is surprising. It's part of the chorus and central to the concept of the song, so it seems like it could pretty easily be included. Sergecross73msg me 01:57, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think "building an invention" is ever said by Candace; this is a genericized version of a specific opener that is unlikely to be predicted as a search term; the full deal is not mentioned at the target, and I don't imagine it would be used as a replacement search term for Candace. Utopes(talk / cont) 01:26, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
An unmentioned catchphrase from the movie Whiplash, a phrase that is never alluded to at the target page. Utopes(talk / cont) 01:23, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
An R from catchphrase not mentioned at the target article, not a likely search term for the Fourth Doctor. Utopes(talk / cont) 01:12, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete. I am EXCEEDINGLY surprised that that catchphrase ISN'T mentioned in the target article, given how ingrained said catchphrase is to the Fourth Doctor's character-- it's as Fourth Doctor as his scarf. If someone were to add it to the article, I don't think I'd support deletion anymore. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 05:22, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
An R from catchphrase that is not listed at the target article. Creator banned for sockpuppetry has had similar deleted catchphrase redirects in the past. Utopes(talk / cont) 01:11, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good night, Chet. Good night, David. And good night, for NBC News
An r from catchphrase from a news report closer that is no longer mentioned at the target. Catchphrases, similar to r from lyrics, are not useful as redirects on a general basis. People searching specifically for a catchphrase are looking for information about this specific search term, which the target does not contain. Utopes(talk / cont) 01:09, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]