This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 29, 2021.
Internet humor/Honor System Virus
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 7#Internet humor/Honor System Virus
Sigma male
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 7#Sigma male
Madame Prime Minister
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 13#Madame Prime Minister
Maiorano (surname)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. Similar redirects will have to be nominated separately if desired. -- Tavix (talk) 02:25, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There are only two: Stefano Maiorano and Nick, a Survivor: Kaôh Rōng contestant. Maiorano currently redirects to the former, where there is a hatnote for the latter. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:12, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no reason to flood Wikipedia with such name redirects. Geschichte (talk) 11:13, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I was confused by this as the current target lists four people with the same surname, however that surname is Maiorana while this redirect is Maiorano. Given that Mairoano is a different surname this is confusing, as we don't have a surname page for Maiorano there is no suitable alternative target. Thryduulf (talk) 13:53, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Listify, convert Maiorano to a surname article, and repoint this there. Aside from Stefano and Nick, there is a saint, San Lorenzo Maiorano, Argentine Minister of Justice Jorge Luis Maiorano -- so there are atleast 4 persons with coverage as topics in some articles -- 65.92.246.43 (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 18:17, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Not all of those are redirects. You should examine the links you provided -- 65.92.246.43 (talk) 03:13, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok, one isn't (Talk:Maiorana). I agree with Geschichte, there's no need for all these redirects. -- 20:30, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Slovaks in Hungary (Giurtelecu Șimleului)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 6#Slovaks in Hungary (Giurtelecu Șimleului)
List of bridges in Washington, D.C.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete for now. Any editor is encouraged to create a list if so inclined. -- Tavix (talk) 02:19, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not all bridges in Washington, D.C. cross the Potomac. See, for example, 11th Street Bridges and Kutz Memorial Bridge. feminist (+) 07:51, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Create a list and retarget the other term there. This way everybody benefits. Thryduulf (talk) 22:30, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 04:15, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:08, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Creating a list would be ideal, but if that's not going to happen right now, delete these as misleading. - Eureka Lott 10:58, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as ambiguous. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:32, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
List of bridges in Boston
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was listify List of bridges in Boston and retarget Bridges in Boston to the new list. -- Tavix (talk) 02:20, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not all bridges in Category:Bridges in Boston cross the Charles River. feminist (+) 07:52, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Either Create a list or retarget to the category. There is no benefit to deleting this useful search term. Thryduulf (talk) 16:18, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 04:15, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:08, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Either Create a list or retarget to the category. per Thryduulf. Huggums537 (talk) 23:21, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Creating a list would be ideal, but if that's not going to happen right now, delete these as misleading. - Eureka Lott 11:00, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Listify. Draft provided. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:32, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Bridges in Chicago
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete for now. Any editor is encouraged to create a list if so inclined. -- Tavix (talk) 02:18, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The BP Pedestrian Bridge does not cross the Chicago River. feminist (+) 07:58, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Create a list at List of bridges in Chicago and retarget the other terms there. Thryduulf (talk) 16:17, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 04:15, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:07, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Create a list at List of bridges in Chicago and retarget the other terms there. per Thryduulf. Huggums537 (talk)
- Creating a list would be ideal, but if that's not going to happen right now, delete these as misleading. - Eureka Lott 11:01, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Monkey vs. scopes trial
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 6#Monkey vs. scopes trial
Culture of Missouri
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 6#Culture of Missouri
Banda Jalal Khan
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 05:26, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The current target is due to this 2010 RfD. At the time, the article had a mention of a village with the name, but that mention is not there anymore. I can't find any evidence for the existence of a subdivision or settlement with this name [1]. – Uanfala (talk) 01:22, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment this was created as an article, but it was just a copy/paste of the very basic facts about Pakistan from the CIA World Factbook or a similar source and redirected to Pakistan 7 minutes later, and then retargetted to the present target (by Cromium) 3 years after that. If revered to that version it would be speedily deletable under A1, A3 and/or A10 so there is no need to send this to AfD if consensus is against keeping it as a redirect. Thryduulf (talk) 03:59, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I’m not sure why I redirected it there but I don’t think it is noteworthy even if it exists. [24Cr][talk] 22:19, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Do we delete it here, or via AfD?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 04:06, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Seriously, guys? AfD for that? – Uanfala (talk) 13:21, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Striked off the relist comment. I misunderstood that one opinion was to delete it via A1/A3/A10, but actually it meant there was no need. Jay (talk) 16:30, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Carrot head
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 13#Carrot head
V discography
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 6#V discography
Pô departmént
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was Move. It was moved to Po (department) without leaving a redirect, which allows us to preserve the history at a less-awkward title. Po (department) has been overwritten, since it had no meaningful history. Jay (talk) 06:16, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User:Verdy p nominated this redirect for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pô departmént; since redirects don't belong at AfD, I am moving the discussion here and procedurally closing the AfD. Verdy p's original deletion rationale follows:
"Non-sense accent on the second term, only a vary old typo left unmaintained for years, but never used anywhere.
After I had properly renamed here, I just wanted to nominate the generated redirect for speedy deletion (matching the current WP policy for deletions: WP:R3 only applies to recently created redirects from "implausible typos or misnomers"), but someone (anonymous IP User:91.219.149.124) reverted this request.
There's absolutely no value in keeping these typos, invalid in all languages (accent in the English term, but still not the correct orthography in French, official in that location), even if this is very old and concerns a page that was just a very early stub with errors and undeveloped. It was also not linked from anywhere (any wiki, or other external sites). The term "departmént" is clearly a misnomer. The name also itself is still ambiguous with present-day department in Burkina Faso and the former department in Northern Italy during the French Empire: there's a separate old discussion for fixing the page name as well for the Italian page and avoid incorrect mixes between the two topics. I have also fived (but kept) other possible names with their redirects, because they are plausible, but NOT this one.
Note also that I have also copied "as is" the old talk into the correct target talk page for the Italian topic."
This is a procedural nomination; I am neutral. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:47, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, as completely wrong and nonsensical. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 09:34, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as implausible. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 19:32, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Just noting that on inspection content from Pô departmént was merged to Pô (department) see [2], [3], but Editorofthewiki forgot to leave an ((R from merge)). That shouldn't stop us from getting rid of the redirect which I agree is implausible, but the history will need to be pushed over to a talk subpage per WP:MAD, since a history merge is impractical. Regards, 91.221.17.220 (talk) 17:14, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to Po (department) without leaving a redirect, which would allow us to preserve the history at a less-awkward title. Po (department) can be overwritten, since it has no meaningful history. - Eureka Lott 11:13, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.