< March 25
March 27 >

March 26

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 26, 2021.

Future-in-the-past

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Future in the past. Thanks Uanfala! -- Tavix (talk) 21:01, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Apart from the easily fixable issue that the section does not exist at the target, I think that redirecting this to the article about the English grammar phenomenon is biased. Grammatical tense seems to be a good alternative. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:18, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 22:03, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Creepy puzzle

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. signed, Rosguill talk 05:29, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure this is not the only creepy puzzle, and the mention at the target is just a quote. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 08:41, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 22:01, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Jeanneretia

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 05:28, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This is the name of a snail genus (see Cepolidae (gastropod)), and should not lead to an article on a plant genus. Animal lover 666 (talk) 09:05, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: "Jeanneretia" appears to also be listed as a synonym at the current target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 21:57, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

ISO 3166-1 N3 Multiuse regional user templates

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. I checked every one of the WLH (!). A few appeared to have a few uses, but were just transclusions of alerts. --BDD (talk) 15:22, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

None of these are useful. While Category:ISO 3166-1 A2 Multiuse regional user templates and Category:ISO 3166-1 A3 Multiuse regional user templates are potential abbreviation codes that people might use for countries, this isn't a system people are going to use for adding their userboxes. These redirects therefore serve no purpose and clutter template-space. Elli (talk | contribs) 06:09, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 21:37, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Elexa

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Ondrej Elexa. signed, Rosguill talk 19:52, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be a product not mentioned anywhere on enwiki, the only uses here are various surnames and given names, mainly in passing mentions spread throughout many articles. Hog Farm Talk 03:57, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:13, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 21:34, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Taxonomy/Strigosella

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 14:39, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

to be deleted. Misleading, see DAB page Strigosella Estopedist1 (talk) 16:46, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawing recommendation, I no longer think it is worth disambiguating because it is not likely to be searched. -- Tavix (talk) 22:32, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 21:31, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

my original nomination was partly true, because link Strigosella (animal) is not accepted. Explanations here: User:Estopedist1/Taxons and disambiguation. We only have to delete the misleading Template:Taxonomy/Strigosella and everything is OK then--Estopedist1 (talk) 08:21, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Planetary or gender symbols

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 12#Planetary or gender symbols

WebView

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete due to no primary topic and to encourage the creation of a page for this concept. ✗plicit 03:43, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural nomination; redirect was blanked by LMB with the following reason:

WebView is NOT Microsoft Edge! Perhaps Edge is based on WebView, but it's a way more general technology than Edge.

JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 19:12, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
My basis for the redirect:
I agree that there is not much information regarding WebView in the Microsoft Edge article (yet). Any better ideas where else to redirect instead? You may also want to start an article on WebView. Ghettoblaster (talk) 19:48, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Added WebView2 as suggested by the IP and since both were created by the same editor.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:32, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to JavaFX#WebView, where this is described. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:19, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I guess that when there is more than one thing called WebView then we need either a separate article describing the general concept or at least a disambiguation page. Ghettoblaster (talk) 18:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I've seen Google Play provides Android System WebView runtime app, and Android Developers website have a portal for WebView API. --Great Brightstar (talk) 07:22, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 21:26, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Seeking Sister Wife

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Turned into stub article. Redirect discussion is moot, since a viable stub has been created. (non-admin closure) Onel5969 TT me 16:48, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This TV series is not mentioned at target or anywhere else on WP. Delete to encourage article creation if sufficiently notable. Mdewman6 (talk) 20:56, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

just make a stub... ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:57, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rickrollers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Rickrolling. (non-admin closure) RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 00:43, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Should be deleted. Obviously just there to "rickroll" people. Eridian314 (talk) 19:47, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Giuseppe Sardi (1624–1699)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Anarchyte (talk • work) 12:13, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects to article on an unrelated Giuseppe Sardi. That article says the two should not be confused, and a redirect will do just that. A red link is preferable in this case. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 19:02, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tell Me About Everything

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Retarget Tell Me About Everything; delete the others. Hog Farm Talk 00:46, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All are songs from an EP that, due to lack of notability, now itself redirects to the artist's article, where these songs aren't mentioned. I suggest deleting them. Lennart97 (talk) 13:44, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Ordinary Life

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:34, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Both are songs from an EP that, due to lack of notability, now itself redirects to the artist's article, where these songs aren't mentioned. I suggest deleting them. Lennart97 (talk) 13:33, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Histereza

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 5#Histereza

Fragilité

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 7#Fragilité

Elastomeri

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 5#Elastomeri

BMZ GmbH

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 5#BMZ GmbH

GeneralLee (disambiguation)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Anarchyte (talk • work) 12:14, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This should target General Lee (disambiguation), but actually none of the entries there use the unspaced form, so I suggest delete. Pinging @Red Slash: as the only human in the edit history. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:19, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

One in a Billion

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Satnam Singh. signed, Rosguill talk 05:25, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Billion is not Million. This guy has a One in a Million album, but so do three others - see One in a Million#Albums. There's also a second redirect, One in a Billion (album), which also points to this guy's discography. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:21, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gulags

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Redirects can be incorrect, as pointed out (see also ((r from incorrect name))/((r from typo))) if they're useful; and that's what the consensus appears to be here. (non-admin closure) RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 22:03, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gulag is a proper name of the Soviet government agency, so any usage of this word in plural form is erroneous and should be eliminated. When they say "Solzhenitsyn's experiences in gulags", they really mean his experiences in labour camp and sharashka, both directed by the Gulag as higher authority. — Mike Novikoff 02:50, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Crypto-libertarianism

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 05:24, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anarchism and libertarianism are different philosophies; although the given example here is anarcho-capitalism, which is...its own matter, libertarianism (including "libertarianism really focused on cryptocurrency") involves a lot of ideological range outside anarcho-capitalism. Also, 'crypto-' as a preface to a political ideology doesn't necessarily refer to cryptocurrency, but also to people who are perceived as hiding their political ideology. By extension, 'cryptolibertarianism' and variants are both ambiguous and overly broad for the target. Vaticidalprophet 00:29, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

SiO2 Group

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 7#SiO2 Group

Vacuum bag

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Disambiguate. signed, Rosguill talk 19:48, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The content these were supposed to be targeting has recently been spun out into it's own article (Vacuum bag moulding) so these redirects no longer point to the right place. I fixed the unambiguous redirects, but I think these merit further discussion. In my opinion the majority of people are more likely to be looking for Vacuum packing than Vacuum bag moulding if they search for these terms, so I propose retargeting these there. Basically every google result for these search terms relates to various forms of vacuum storage bags. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 14:28, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for starting this discussion. The two redirects I created Vacuum-bagged and Vacuum bagged only redirect from sailboat type articles, where those boats are constructed using fibreglass/composite vacuum bagging processes, so these should redirect to Vacuum bag moulding, not Vacuum packing. - Ahunt (talk) 14:42, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There's only been 6 incoming links made to those two redirects in the 4 years these have existed, so it wouldn't take much effort to change them to piped links if these get retargeted. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 14:55, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
True, but I already fixed them. - Ahunt (talk) 15:38, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:15, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
More