< August 21
August 23 >

August 22

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 22, 2020.

Rudnichny City District, Prokopyevsk

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted per G7. -- Tavix (talk) 18:35, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article. Onel5969 TT me 23:30, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The page never caught on. -iaspostb□x+ 00:19, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rudnichny City District, Kemerovo

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted per WP:G7. -- Tavix (talk) 18:36, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article Onel5969 TT me 23:29, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The page never caught on. -iaspostb□x+ 00:19, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Saray-Chekurcha, Republic of Tatarstan

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted per WP:G7. -- Tavix (talk) 18:37, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned on target article. Onel5969 TT me 23:28, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The page never caught on. -iaspostb□x+ 00:19, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Zheleznodorozhnogo razyezda Saray-Chekurcha

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted per WP:G7. -- Tavix (talk) 18:37, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article Onel5969 TT me 23:28, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll willing to turn my own tides in your favor. Therefore Delete, as the page never caught on. -iaspostb□x+ 00:19, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

1st runner-up

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 30#1st runner-up

Kaitak

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 30#Kaitak

Reasonable Woman

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Reasonable person#Reasonable woman. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 01:49, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is no confirmation the album is being released or will go by this name --Another Believer (Talk) 15:17, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 21:04, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Redirects to Cleopatra Records

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 17:04, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A set of musicians and groups that aren't mentioned at the target article. They are non-notable acts who may be signed to the label and whose only mentions on Wikipedia are on a compilation or two put out by the label, such as the recently created The Black Bible and This Is Goth!, but offer no other info. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 20:49, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ostralia

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. signed, Rosguill talk 17:03, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible redirect. Besides, we don't have the redirects "Ostralian", "Ostralians", and "Ostralias". Seventyfiveyears at 19:35, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Singapore redirects

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 22:02, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Both of those redirects are implausible. They are also not even a close spelling to their target name. Seventyfiveyears at 19:18, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Maddam Sir – Kuch Baat Hai Kyunki Jazbaat Hai

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete by Fastily per criterion R2. The content and edit history formerly at this title can be found at Draft:Maddam Sir – Kuch Baat Hai Kyunki Jazbaat Hai. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 19:30, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Improbable search term. Currently a redirect, after an inexperienced editor copy/pasted the article contents from another page.

Nobody in their right mind is going to be searching for the TV series "Maddam Sir" by using the title plus its tagline. There are five Google News hits for the title+tagline, and over 3000 for for "Maddam Sir". So the correct WP:COMMONTITLE is Maddam Sir, and that's where the article should go, and that's what most people are going to search for. Dubious that we need a redirect to this other article. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:17, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure I understand the logic of this !vote. I'm not denying that the phrase exists. Kuch Baat Hai Kyunki Jazbaat Hai is a tagline, as indicated in the source you mention above. It would be like having a redirect from "Alien - In Space No One Can Hear You Scream" or "The Big Lebowski - They Figured He Was a Lazy, Time Wasting Slacker. They Were Right." Who's ever going to type that? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:15, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of sponges

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Lists of sponges. And we're done! (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 14:06, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No such list at target. Interesting though is that the is a more WP:PRECISE-ly titled article with a more precise scope: List of sponges of South Africa. Steel1943 (talk) 17:16, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Nanay Baby

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 00:35, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing in the target discusses this. Onel5969 TT me 16:26, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Let's see, i have this:

Nanay Baby, environmental protector [[1]]

Happy Birthday Nanay [[2]]

So, that means it is true. Rdp060707 (talk) 12:55, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dr. Kubota

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 30#Dr. Kubota

Wineaux

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:56, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect is neither mentioned nor found in the "Wino" disambiguation page. Seventyfiveyears at 15:06, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Misuri

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 00:25, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Implausible redirect, not even a close spelling to its target name. Seventyfiveyears at 14:17, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The country? It's a subnational unit. Hog Farm Bacon 21:38, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Spanish is the second most spoken language in the country where Missouri is. I don't know what is the second most spoken language in Missouri. – Uanfala (talk) 00:58, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Spanish is the second most spoken language in Missouri with around 146,000 speakers or about 2.65% of the population in 2010. -- Tavix (talk) 13:33, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lilly 101

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. MBisanz talk 15:41, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect is old, but without a mention in the target article, remains as incomprehensible as the day it was created on 11 May 2010. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:48, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Software Entertainment Company

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 00:14, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Common name. Can't find anything connected with this particular company. - The9Man (Talk) 11:35, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MobyGames: "Dynamix Inc. was located in Eugene, Oregon. Originally, the company was named Software Entertainment Company," --Mika1h (talk) 11:38, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of twin towns and sister cities in The Netherlands

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 20:55, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect contains a miscapitalisation of the article "the" and no longer serves a purpose. gidonb (talk) 02:16, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Game Of Thrones is allcaps. This isn't. gidonb (talk) 17:13, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Michael Walker (journalist)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 31#Michael Walker (journalist)

List of Middle-earth rivers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:24, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is no list of Middle-earth rivers anywhere on Wikipedia that I'm aware of. The old history of this article was deleted as a result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Middle-earth rivers (2nd nomination), so this redirects dates only to December 2019 and has no substantive page history, it's only ever been a redirect. Hog Farm Bacon 23:53, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom. GimliDotNet (talk) 19:14, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 00:08, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tea bag movement

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. signed, Rosguill talk 17:01, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not finding anything that suggests this is a common misnomer for the organization. Hog Farm Bacon 22:34, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 23:12, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 00:08, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Star Wars 7 1/2

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. MBisanz talk 15:40, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The title of the word "1/2" is not mentioned in target article, and is implausible and confusing. See section #Star Wars one and a halves for more. The redirect was created as the redirect which targets to Rogue One. Chompy Ace 13:42, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To editor Chompy Ace: I moved this discussion lower to be grouped next to the others. I didn't feel good merging since one already garnered some !votes, and this one had not. If an admin sees no issue, perhaps they will.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Star Wars one and a halves

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. MBisanz talk 15:40, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"1/2" redirects are neither a sequel or extension to the seventh film of the Skywalker saga, Star Wars: Episode VII - The Force Awakens, and it is false imformation. Therefore, Rogue One: A Star Wars Story is a standalone anthology film. I searched "Star Wars Episode 7 1/2" on Google Search, and it says which contains pure content about The Force Awakens. Chompy Ace 08:29, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
More