The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:40, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• 15232 → Timeline of the far future  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There's no definite way of determining that searchers of this term are looking for a year, let alone one AD. Steel1943 (talk) 23:28, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:33, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 18:04, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, was kept originally because 11th millennium and beyond mentioned the date. The current target does not. —Xezbeth (talk) 09:17, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. It's also a zip code for Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, but doesn't carry notability like 90210 does. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:06, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:40, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Times of other orders of magnitude → Orders of magnitude (time)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The use of "other" males this redirect unclear what it refers to. Steel1943 (talk) 23:18, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as implausible. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 18:04, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Agreed this is unclear. Units of time and Time scale are more helpful. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:13, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:40, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Characters of Blood+ (Other characters) → List of Blood+ characters#Minor characters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unclear what "Other characters" refers to. Steel1943 (talk) 23:06, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Non-standard title, incorrect disambiguation with some miscapitalisation thrown in there as well. —Xezbeth (talk) 08:19, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as implausible. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 18:05, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as bad disambiguation. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 04:56, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:40, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Mutara Other Area → Mutara, Rwanda  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unclear why this redirect exists or what it refers to. Steel1943 (talk) 23:04, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as vague. It's probably a section for a future article expansion--Lenticel ^(talk) 00:31, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as vague, unlikely search term. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 18:06, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not a specific area to make an article about. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:10, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Moved per Thryduulf's suggestion below/ (non-admin closure) UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:58, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Do not give Hitler posthumous victories. → Emil Fackenheim  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete The trailing stop makes this a very unlikely search term. Not necessary, since Do not give Hitler posthumous victories already exists, same target UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:41, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. per nom. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:01, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• This needs to be histmerged prior to deletion if that is the result of this discussion. It holds the edit history that was cut/pasted to the target article. Killiondude (talk) 00:24, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Move somewhere without deleting history. Obviously not a good title, but as Killiondude notes, the page history needs to be preserved. Unfortunately, a history merge would make a mess, since there's a good deal of overlapping history; you'd end up with diffs like this. An alternate route is to dump the full list of this page's contributors somewhere (e.g. onto Talk:Emil Fackenheim) and link to it from an edit summary in the article's history; this isn't quite as good, as it can be edited away, but it's still sufficient for attribution. Nyttend (talk) 20:15, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Move without a redirect to Don't give Hitler posthumous victories to preserve the history, that is a very plausible rendering of this phrase. Thryduulf (talk) 20:45, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Pazuzu (disambiguation). Thryduulf (talk) 20:23, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Pazuzu (comics) → List of Marvel Comics characters: P#Pazuzu  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There does not appear to be information about this character anywhere, nor a need for information about this character (no incoming links in article space, character appears three times according to Marvel Wikia). I think it should be deleted. Namenamenamenamename (talk) 23:26, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget Pazuzu (disambiguation), where several of entries could be considered as relating to "comics". Deryck C. 14:41, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  I only see Nightcrawler and Howard the Duck, but the history of this page suggests those are actually the same character. We could retarget to Howard the Duck, where a Pazuzu is mentioned; Olivier (comics) has a mention in the context of Nightcrawler, though nothing at Nightcrawler (comics) itself. --BDD (talk) 15:21, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  I see separate entries for Pazuzu and Suzy Pazuzu on the disambiguation page. Those seem to be separate characters, no? --Bsherr (talk) 16:53, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  Well, this redirect used to be an article, as you can see in the history I linked to. It seems to describe a character involved with both of them. I don't know if Howard's "Suzy Pazuzu" is actually a different character. You wouldn't think they'd use it for multiple characters in the same title, but maybe. --BDD (talk) 17:10, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  It looks to me like Suzy Pazuzu is a parody amalgamation. --Bsherr (talk) 17:11, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  If these are the same character appearing in different comics within the same (or overlapping) fictional universe, we can consolidate the entries into one bullet point with multiple sub-points, providing references as necessary. We still need to point this redirect to a navigation page because the actual information about this character is split across multiple articles about different comics. Deryck C. 14:19, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to (the now cleaned-up) Pazuzu (disambiguation). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 23:03, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Pazuzu (disambiguation). Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 18:08, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Howard the Duck. For a retarget to the disambiguation to work, there would have to be multiple entries related to comics—otherwise it is not ambiguous. Unless someone is willing to convince me that one of the other entries is related to comics or if the Marvel Comics character is actually multiple characters, this is where I will default. -- Tavix ^(talk) 19:34, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • The entry for Lucifer (Prince of Darkness) appears to be from a comic. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 20:13, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Ah, that's what I missed. Retarget to the disambiguation. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:19, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:42, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Khabardar (unreleased film) → Tatineni Rama Rao  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target article. The redirect was formerly an article which was redirected per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khabardar (unreleased film). Steel1943 (talk) 20:40, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. A searcher will learn nothing about the subject at the target. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:00, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:42, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Rinse (Unreleased) → Vanessa Carlton  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Confusing disambiguator. Per the article, Vanessa Carlton created an unreleased album named Rinse. However, an "album" is not an "unreleased". The disambiguator makes it seem like the target subject could be related to possibly anything on the disambiguation page Rinse. In other words, Rinse (unreleased album) would possibly be a useful redirect towards the nominated redirect's target, but the nominated redirect is just confusing. Steel1943 (talk) 20:37, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as vague --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:35, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:00, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as above. Implies there's a group or show called Unreleased and that's one of their tracks or episodes. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:55, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:42, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Unreleased Killadelphia Muzik → Meek Mill  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The target article is unclear what this refers to. Steel1943 (talk) 20:24, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 19:52, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Byzantine–Latin wars → Nicaean–Latin wars  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• Byzantine-Latin wars → Nicaean–Latin wars  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

The article Nicaean–Latin wars was created at this namespace but moved to its current location because "Byzantine–Latin wars" is a far more extensive term (see Template:Campaignbox Byzantine-Latin Wars) than what was covered. However, it apparently leads to confusion since some editors tend to replace "Byzantine–Latin wars" with "Nicaean–Latin wars", even where the former topic is actually meant. Deleting and WP:REDLINKing it would possibly also encourage article creation Constantine ✍ 20:02, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• @Cplakidas: I'm confused - are you saying that the Byznatine–Latin wars are a subset of the Nicaean–Latin wars or a synonym of them? If either of those are true then this seems like a useful search term. If it's somethin else then please can you try to explain again as I've misunderstood your nomination. I've added Byzantine-Latin wars (with a hyphen rather than ndash) to this nomination as they should obviously point to the same target. Thryduulf (talk) 14:47, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Thryduulf: exactly the other way round: "Byzantine–Latin wars" is the broader term, for it concerns series of conflicts that effectively begins with the Byzantine–Norman wars during the middle of the 11th century and ends with the conquest of the Principality of Achaea in 1430. "Nicaean–Latin wars" refers to the period 1204-1261, since that is the duration of the Empire of Nicaea. Constantine ✍ 14:57, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • In which case Delete per WP:REDLINK would indeed seem to be the best option. Thryduulf (talk) 15:11, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:43, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Production, costs, and pricing → Outline of industrial organization  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete per WP:XY (or, in this case, WP:XYZ UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:35, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as above. Google searches attempted to match it to Cost-of-production theory of value but there's no shorthand for the three words together in that article. Cost price would be another option, but again, too vague. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:58, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. If someone is able to add context to the article with a sourced mention of the term, I think that would alleviate enough concern expressed here to allow recreation at that time. -- Tavix ^(talk) 19:48, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Windows Genuine Disadvantage → Windows Genuine Advantage  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is a poor redirect and it can cause a lot of confusion. This is not mentioned in the target and is opposite to the subject of this redirect's target. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:53, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is clearly a redirect from an intentional antonym used to mock, disparage and/or make fun of the target. Sometimes these make good redirects, sometimes they don't and it's not immediately clear to me which category this one falls into. Thryduulf (talk) 18:06, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as an unlikely search term. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 21:56, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not a valid ((R from antonym)) either. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 03:57, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The term is disparaging but was widely used in the more colloquial corners of respectable organisations [1] [2] [3] [4]. Readers may want to know what it referred to. A WP search for "~Windows Genuine Disadvantage" doesn't find the WGA article in its 100 results (though the eighth result NPAPI has a link to it). Certes (talk) 10:46, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This seems a typical WP:RFD#D3: the redirect is (mildly) abusive and not discussed in the article. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 22:14, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment is there a term for such redirects? Internet Exploder, for example, redirects to Satiric misspelling AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:52, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Paine Ellsworth: is possibly the most likely person to know the term if there is one. Thryduulf (talk) 15:49, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  ((R from non-neutral name)) applies. I don't know if there's a more specific one. --BDD (talk) 17:09, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Thank you for the ping, Thryduulf! As you know, these are usually kept because readers often copy and paste a phrase from elsewhere on the Internet to the WP search field. And BDD has provided the correct rcat for categorization, ((R from non-neutral name)) (and of course ((R unprintworthy)) should also be included). Paine Ellsworth, ed.  ^put'r there  02:30, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per Shhhnotsoloud: not discussed. UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:02, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  Not that I expect you to change your mind, UnitedStatesian, but this is the type of redirect that is seldom if ever found in its target article, very much like Redirects from misspellings, Redirects from miscapitalisations, and so on. Paine Ellsworth, ed.  ^put'r there  20:19, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:43, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Frankie (UPCOMING film) → Frankie (2019 film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The disambiguator is in all CAPs when Frankie (upcoming film) already exists. Steel1943 (talk) 17:30, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete WP:COSTLY. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:02, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete PER nom [sic] Unless there's a film produced by a company called UPCOMING, but there isn't. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:58, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:43, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Suez Cement (Asmant el-Suweis) → Suez Cement SC  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Can't find this redirect useful. We shouldn't have the translation of the club's name in the title alongside the official name. Ben5218 (talk) 17:28, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:UE, a mix of English and transliterated Arabic. 178.164.162.144 (talk) 01:09, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 19:56, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Assiout Cement → Suez Cement SC  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This redirect is named Assiout Cement, a team that used to play in the Egyptian Premier League. However, it redirects to another former-Egyptian Premier League side called Suez Cement; which is a way different club with only a similar name. Since we don't have an article about that club on Wikipedia, I think this redirect should be deleted. Ben5218 (talk) 17:22, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:03, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. WP:RFD#DELETE item 2. Also, there's no Asyut Cement article, which is important since the city article's at Asyut. Nyttend (talk) 20:19, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. --BDD (talk) 23:25, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to existing article on Asyut Petroleum per this and this. @Ben5218, Shhhnotsoloud, and Nyttend:, thoughts? GiantSnowman 08:46, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @GiantSnowman: I don't think that's a good idea. Asyut Petroleum is a different club based in the same city. I thought about creating a page for Asyut Cement, but they are playing in Egyptian Third Division now so it's going to be hard for me to find good sources. Maybe I'll end up creating it but only as a WP:STUB. I'll see what I can do. Ben5218 (talk) 01:50, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:43, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Trial by Fire (upcoming film) → Trial by Fire (2018 film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Blood Brother (upcoming film) → Blood Brother (2018 film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Odiyan (upcoming film) → Odiyan  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Only You (upcoming film) → Relive  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Cabaret (upcoming film) → Cabaret (2019 film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• After the Wedding (upcoming film) → After the Wedding (2019 film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Crackdown (upcoming video game) → Crackdown 3  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Stockholm (upcoming film) → Stockholm (2018 film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Sweetheart (upcoming film) → Sweetheart (2019 film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Kalavu (upcoming film) → Kalavu (2019 film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Simba (upcoming film) → Simba (2019 film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• The Mule (upcoming film) → The Mule (2018 film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Serenity (upcoming film) → Serenity (2019 film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Skin (upcoming film) → Skin (2018 film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Native Son (upcoming film) → Native Son (2019 film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Stockholm (Upcoming film) → Stockholm (2018 film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No longer upcoming. Steel1943 (talk) 15:58, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I believe all of these qualify as speedy G6, housekeeping. UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:21, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Easy one here. Ben5218 (talk) 21:29, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:35, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. I can't follow the nomination either, but even without it there seems to be enough to delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:00, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Famous Tsunamis → Tsunami#Historic_tsunami  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This was one tsunami, not several, so the plural and the caps make this a bit WP:RFD#D5 nonsense. I can think of a famous Toon Army, but this isn't them. 178.164.162.144 (talk) 11:28, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Not sure I follow the first sentence of the nomination, but "famous" is subjective, and capitalisation unnecessary. Note Famous tsunami and Famous tsunamis do not exist. And the target is broken because it should be List of historical tsunamis. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:42, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect all three to List of historical tsunamis ~ R.T.G 12:44, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I only listed one. Which are the other two? 178.164.162.144 (talk) 13:54, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment above me lists 2 red links. And you could add Famous Tsunami to make 4 total that would be looking for the closest to that page, List of... ~ R.T.G 16:19, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. No such moniker or media title. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:04, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Note that Japanese uses "tsunami" for the plural as well as the singular (see Tsunami#Tsunami), and this form is sometimes used for the plural in English, so singular/plural should not be an issue here. Nyttend (talk) 20:22, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:44, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Carlos Septién (businessman) → Grupo Elektra  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention at target article Grupo Elektra. —Bagumba (talk) 09:59, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Carlos Septien Michel was CEO of Grupo Elektra, so I'd be happy to keep and tag ((R without mention)), but equally happy with delete. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:54, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, I nominated this because he didn't seem readily notable to be mentioned in the article, nor do I believe it's common to start an embedded list of CEOs on company articles.—Bagumba (talk) 10:07, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: insufficiently notable for a redirect. --K.e.coffman (talk) 20:58, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:45, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• ErnestHemingway/FamousatTwentyFiveThirtyaMaster → Ernest Hemingway  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete. This doesn't pass WP:CAMELCASE as the "a" between "Thirty" and "Master" is lowercase. Incredibly unlikely search term, just cruft.178.164.162.144 (talk) 09:34, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unlikely search term. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:55, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom and leftovers from old format that won't be useful as an archive. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:05, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:45, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Famous Writer → Hatoful Boyfriend  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is mentioned only in the infobox as "Member", I am not sure what that means in this context. There are many people who could be called a famous writer, but we don't have that in the lowercase. Hatoful Boyfriend isn't a famous writer, and Hateful boyfriend is red, as is Hatoful, so I imagine this is a mistranslation in Japlish. WP:RFD#D2 confusing. 178.164.162.144 (talk) 09:19, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. "Famous" is subjective, and capitalisation unnecessary, with other variations redlinks. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:56, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: Famous Writer is the game's engine, and noted on the article as such (not as "Memeber" like OP claims it is). I created the redirect in 2015 because, at the time, Hatoful Boyfriend was the only notable game using the engine; I don't know how true this statement is today, since I haven't checked for a while. I would not oppose or support deletion, but if this one is deleted, FamousWriter (unspaced) should be as well. Lordtobi (✉) 13:05, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good call. FamousWriter is used in the article (but not Famous Writer), with a piped link for "engine" to game engine. That suggests to me that it should be WP:REDLINK to encourage the creation of the article. You are right, if one goes, both go, I hadn't spotted FamousWriter yet. "Oh Infamy, Infamy, they've all got it in for me". 178.164.162.144 (talk) 14:03, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You're right it is in the Infobox as "Engine" not "Member" as I said in the OP. Stil, to have variant spellings within an article is not such a good thing, even though MOS:CONSISTENCY has nothing to say about it except for British or American spellings, somewhat bizarelly there is nothing to say try to keep spelling consistent within an article. `WP:CONSISTENCY is about article titles themselves.) 178.164.162.144 (talk) 14:11, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete The developer also redirects to this game, but it doesn't seem to have much use outside of this one game. It's not even listed in List of visual novel engines; it would not be missed. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:10, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn now that a reasonable variant of it appears in the article. (non-admin closure) UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:27, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Book Your Own Fucking Life → Maximumrocknroll  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete Does not appear in target article. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:45, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete or add information from a couple of minutes research it appears to be the title of a zine that was a guide to booking and organising (punk) gigs in the 80s and 90s (and maybe earlier?). Siue Moffat describes it as "a free online resource for independent artists and promoters, once a hard copy zine published by Maximumrocknroll", but that's the only reference on Wikipedia and a less good target. So while the current target isn't wrong it's not helpful. From what my brief research has told me it seems notable enough for at least a mention, possibly a section, at the target but until there is something there this redirect is confusing. Thryduulf (talk) 20:06, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, I just added a sentence about it. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 02:26, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, in lede of target with reference. 178.164.162.144 (talk) 10:00, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy keep. The nominator withdrawn (non-admin closure) B dash (talk) 06:27, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Hitlers architect → Albert Speer  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• Hitler's architect → Albert Speer  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not sure. Undoubtedly Speer was an architect who worked for Hitler. There is a book by Martin Kitchen called "Speer: Hitler's Architect". We have Hitler's architect with the apostrophe, but I can't really classify this as ((R from incorrect punctuation)), nor Hitler's architect as ((R from other name)), and various film documentaries on "Speer: Hitler's Architect" and "Hitler's Henchmen: The Architect Albert Speer" etc. Absolutely no doubt Speer is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for this title, but something makes me uneasy about the lowercase "a": A reader searching for Hitler's Architect is going to end up automatically taken to Speer, not to the book or film they might be looking for. Perhaps I am being too pedantic. 178.164.162.144 (talk) 05:25, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, sends people to what they are looking for. If somebody creates an article about Kitchen's book, we can discuss whether that should be the correct target. Or provide a hatnote. —Kusma (t·c) 09:53, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, I was notified as I created these. Well I had to check but he is sure enough known as Hitlers architect, Hitlers top architect, and Hitlers favourite architect. One of the top search hits was from the other day, about his daughter. There are at least 3 books with the term in the title (probably where I got it from), and its commonly used inside the books (after Google search). Theres no ambiguity. There's ambiguity in the book. ~ R.T.G 11:33, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Then Withrdaw as nominator, please. I don't like the one without the apostrophe (and you may notice RTG didn't use it, and I myself think the apostrophe is rather a waste of time, but that is a different argument), but it isn't doing any harm. I was more concerned that we are sending people on a wild goose chase when they want a documentary book or film, not the chap himself. But I am happy to say Keep and speedily withdraw this one please. 178.164.162.144 (talk) 11:59, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It may be worth putting a disambiguation header of some sort that brings people to the books if they are popular or something, but it's a featured article by the looks with almost 200 book citations in the refs (a whole page of em). Otherwise, I don't know much significant about it except they designed a city, more was the nature of the buildings I was looking at if I recall o/ ~ R.T.G 12:35, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as plausible search term. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 18:14, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep apostrophe. Library catalogues and WorldCat (see http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/1011094908) typically use sentence case, which results in "Hitler's architect" rather than "Hitler's Architect". Whether or not "Hitlers" is plausible here, "architect" definitely is. Nyttend (talk) 20:25, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Procedural close. Procedural close: is now article (non-admin closure) Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 13:48, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Venetian Renaissance architecture → Italian Renaissance &n-bsp;(talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A bit WP:XY. It could be kept here, or could go to Renaissance architecture. Both mention Venice etc., but one would expect this topic to be specifically about Venetian Renaissance architecture and not, for example, Venetian Gothic architecture, so maybe delete it. 178.164.162.144 (talk) 03:59, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep It is an article that has yet to be written. See, Category:Renaissance architecture in Venice, has 64 pages to the topic, ~ R.T.G 12:56, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. A redlink would encourage article creation. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:59, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:REDLINK. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 18:14, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Hello, @Shhhnotsoloud, Rubbish computer, and 178.164.162.144:, I have found a 19th century book on Venetian architecture online and downloaded it and used it to create a stub at Venetian Renaissance architecture. That, I believe you will find, is the best way to encourage the creation of an article. The Venetian Renaissance was marked by struggle and inequality. Venice itself is a relatively small to medium sized city today. It is easy to suspect that very few people exist who have a special interest in this exact period, and will not be attracted to a red link for which they have nothing, so much as they will by a blue link to an article for which they have at least a passing interest. o/ ~ R.T.G 13:01, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Procedural close now this is no longer a redirect. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:13, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:47, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Falkor (microarchitecture) → Qualcomm  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There is a passing mention in section "Products" that the Centriq chipset is based on this, but it doesn't give any details. Centriq (not linked in the target) is a redirect to Qualcomm Centriq, which mentions it three times, but again only as a name, not with any info on what the Falkor microarchitecture actually is. So perhaps delete it per WP:REDLINK. 178.164.162.144 (talk) 03:05, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 18:15, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Unix architecture#Kernel. Retarget to a more relevant topic is better (non-admin closure) B dash (talk) 06:26, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• UNIX kernel architecture → Kernel (operating system)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• UNIX kernel → Unix  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Probably retarget both to Unix architecture, as Unix kernel structure does. The current target Kernel (operating system) does have a section "Unix" but it is very small, and the R is not targeted to that section. 178.164.162.144 (talk) 02:30, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget Unix architecture#Kernel looks like the best target, as we seem to have no Unix equivalent of Linux kernel. I've put a link to Kernel (operating system)#Unix at the start of that section. Certes (talk) 03:00, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense to me. To be absolutely clear @Certes:, retarget both? And make Unix kernel structure target that section, too? 178.164.162.144 (talk) 04:08, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would say retarget all three, either to Unix architecture#Kernel (more relevant) or Kernel (operating system)#Unix (better written). Ideally, we would have a new article Unix kernel merging those sections with relevant bits of Unix#Components, Linux kernel and any other snippets we can find, but I don't know the topic well enough to write that. Certes (talk) 10:52, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed Qzekrom (talk) 09:09, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Thryduulf (talk) 14:51, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Contractor Tax Solutions → Tax avoidance  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

WP:RDEL 4: promotion for contractortaxsolutions.com (now defunct). Certes (talk) 01:18, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:11, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 18:12, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.