< May 4
May 6 >

May 5

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 5, 2018.

Fucking anal

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 20:47, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's oddly worded: people may refer to anal sex as "fucking anally" or "anal fucking," but I've never heard the phrase "fucking anal," and we don't have a similar redirect for "fucking oral" to oral sex (not that I believe any of those should be created as redirects). I think the biggest reason to delete is that is is only one letter off from the movie title Fucking Amal, which could cause embarrassment if people were looking up a (non-pornographic) movie and accidentally went to a page on anal sex. Raymond1922 (talk) 00:06, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Morechella bispora

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 00:48, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be typo for "Morchella ...", but also no mention of anything "... bispora" at target article. No evidence that this is a useful redirect. PamD 09:03, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, I've made a typo, it should be spelled Morchella. I don't see how to rename a page, can you do this for me? It was for the biography of the first person to discover it in Canada, Alfred Brooker Klugh, https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Klugh-50. I took the term from the book "Essays on the Early History of Plant Pathology and Mycology in Canada", 1994, by Ralph H Estey, page 264, https://books.google.fr/books?id=_tstGOViLLsC&pg=PA264. MycoBank gives it as a synonym for Verpa bohemica, http://www.mycobank.org/BioloMICS.aspx?TableKey=14682616000000067&Rec=232007. PhilipBroughtonMills (talk) 09:34, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: procedural relist, redirect was not tagged for most of the discussion due to a move.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 23:55, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Emma Duncan

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Not opposed to a dab being created, but as there are no actual Emma Duncan articles, the WP:REDLINK wins out. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:08, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The subject is not mentioned anywhere in The Economist, misleading given that there are multiple Emma Duncans. czar 22:18, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's fine to recreate if/when those exist with enough sourcing, but right now none of them do? czar 10:08, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Khangate

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 20:45, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Possible BLP violation, not mention in either his article or the article on his premiership Doug Weller talk 20:00, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Tpv5-n and others

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 20:45, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible redirects. Septrillion (talk) 18:44, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Cross namespace

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. We should not redirect a page and then nominate it at RfD as if that has been the target. That being said, these do seem made in error-ish, and there is some desire to delete, so taking it as good-faith delete that, even for their original targets, we'd still be here. Happy to undo if there is disagreement. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 00:51, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No reason for these cross-namespace redirects UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:05, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Holcomb C3-R

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Unopposed. C3-R is relevant, but Holcomb was never present in the target. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:05, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

brand name, not mentioned in linked article. DGG ( talk ) 16:02, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Danger opportunity

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted per G7 by Fastily. -- Tavix (talk) 13:16, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This phrase is ambiguous in nature and could describe forms of risk. To redirect it to an article about a foreign language translation could be seen as a WP:SURPRISE and also forces readers to go to a specific article when Wikipedia's search function could provide readers better assistance. Steel1943 (talk) 15:36, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Antimaterials

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 20:44, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Undiscovered antimaterials, not notable. Might as well have these for every material documented on Wikipedia... –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 08:58, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I think we know where this is heading, but none of these were appropriately tagged, so in the interest of procedure, I'm relisting them. I've tagged them all.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amory (u • t • c) 12:51, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Lithium through Nitrogen, plus Water, as currently discussed topics in science media and hence plausible search terms.
Delete or Change target for Oxygen and Chlorine, maybe Sodium and Sulphur also, as antimatter is not the only/primary meaning.
Delete other elements as too soon. --Qetuth (talk) 10:46, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Do you mind sharing some examples of where those forms of antimatter are "currently discussed topics in science media"? My own understanding is that synthesis of antiberyllium (and hence all heavier antimatter elements) is generally considered impossible. 50.248.234.77 (talk) 23:27, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies, it seems I messed up my googling on these. On reading closer the articles I'd found, most were primarily about antihydrogen and mentioned others only in passing such as in this Slate article. Several were copies or coverage of Gerald Jacksons work, such as this, which seems more fringy today than it did last night (I think I was fooled by talks he did being hosted at .edu domains?). What remains is many quora / yahoo answers questions and article / forum comments, which show only that these may be plausible search terms by the curious. --Qetuth (talk) 02:34, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kevinism

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to German Kevinism. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:07, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Expression is not mentioned in the target article, this page should be deleted. WWGB (talk) 12:26, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

CCAV

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 May 15#CCAV

AJ-100

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 06:12, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target. TheSandDoctor Talk 01:44, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
More