The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:09, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• DONALD tump → Donald Trump  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Weird combination of typo and incorrect capitalization. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 22:19, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Several wrongs make not a likely typo. Steel1943 (talk) 00:47, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this is incorrect, the correct version is "Donald TRUMP" or TRUMP Donald or TRUMP, Donald -- 70.52.11.217 (talk) 03:14, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom unlikely typo combination. CSD R3 may apply, but I'm assuming that didn't go through? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:07, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Useless. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 05:58, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:09, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Jessica(Merchant of Venice) → Jessica (The Merchant of Venice)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unlikely redirect due to lack of space between title and disambiguator. Steel1943 (talk) 22:13, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, per Steel1943. PamD 10:48, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep. The article existed at that name for some time so there may be external links to it that would break if deleted. Redirects are cheap, so I see no pressing need to delete it. --Xover (talk) 14:20, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per nom. Redirects are cheap but that's no reason to keep pointless ones._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 16:16, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Entries linking to this typo can be easily moved. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:38, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Not worth keeping. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 03:02, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:21, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• GOAT Store → List of Dreamcast homebrew games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Goat Store → List of Dreamcast homebrew games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• GOAT Store Publishing → List of Dreamcast homebrew games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• GoatStore → List of Dreamcast homebrew games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Apparently, the subject of these redirects is a video game publisher, not the title of a video game itself. Given their current target, a list of video games, redirecting to their current target is misleading and confusing as the subject of the redirects not defined at the target. Steel1943 (talk) 17:31, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep all. The Goat Store is associated with homebrew Dreamcast publishing,[1][2] as is the subject of the target, and is mentioned in the article's list. (not watching, please ((ping))) czar 19:23, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - I'm not sure if the Dreamcast related group is that well-known. It should be mentioned that 'Goat Store' and related terms are also used by a shoe-selling service, which may be notable. It's received some press coverage. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 10:52, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate. While by a pure count of !votes we are split 2.5dab-2r-1del, the "retarget" !voters do not make any argument as to why "multitool" should be considered the primary target. As such, I close in favor of disambiguation, for want of a policy- or evidence-based argument to the contrary. (non-admin closure)  — PinkAmpers&^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 17:25, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Omni-tool → Mass Effect  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Overly vague sci-fi concept to redirect anywhere, should be left up to the search function. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 02:03, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete or Weak dabify. Uses in Mighty Ducks (TV series), List of concepts in Artemis Fowl, and Soma (video game). AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 11:31, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll add that it would have to be mentioned in the article to be of any use, perhaps as a dab. There is coverage in news articles such as Venture Beat: [3] and Nerdist [4] but it still requires a mention in the Mass Effect article. The Some game has this article from Zam [5] AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:20, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've created a list of these entries. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:57, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Striking delete vote above. It looks like we have better redirect suggestions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:41, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete not even mentioned in the target. It could have been speedily deleted I think. Domdeparis (talk) 17:29, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to multi-tool as a reasonable synonym. Stuff exists outside video games, you guys. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 20:27, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Omni", though? That implies that it can literally become any tool... which the one in Mass Effect can, but in real life is impossible. It is a science fiction concept._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 07:30, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to multitool as a ((R from incorrect name)); IIRC there are some brand names for some various speciality multitools called omnitools -- 70.52.11.217 (talk) 03:17, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this redirects to multitool then either Omnitool (disambiguation) should be created for the list of items or perhaps a section can be created in multi-tools article called Fictional multi-tools, although that could easily spam up the article. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:41, 18 January 2018 (UTC) updated 23:54, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Dabify per AngusWOOF's search results. -- JHunterJ (talk) 13:59, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Dabify I don't think that multitool is more likely to be looked for when searching for omni tool than the artemis fowl one or others. Galobtter (pingó mió) 18:09, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:08, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Mario J. Lanza → Survivor (U.S. TV series)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Originally this prodded as lacking notability, then changed to a redirect. However, he really doesn't have much to do with the show itself, he just writes fan fiction about it. ... discospinster _talk 17:29, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fan fiction author isn't notable for the show. Apparently, he is a Survivor fan writer / analyst who has written some books on the show along with Brad Wolgast, but none of them have notable work to meet WP:NAUTHOR. The main page doesn't have a listing of Further Reading where his name could go. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:43, 18 January 2018 (UTC) updated 01:33, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:07, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• California potato power → Shin Megami Tensei: Persona 4  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Makes no sense and I have never heard about it in context of the game. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 16:32, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• It's an infamous misheard lyrics from the opening song. [6], [7] Ben · Salvidrim! ✉ 03:43, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete can't be covered in Wikipedia due to lack of reliable sources, so we have nowhere to send the reader. We don't have redirects for more famous examples of this like burn my bread either. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 15:11, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment those would be great examples for Misheard lyrics or Mondegreen, but unfortunately reliable sources aren't covering these and it's not mentioned in the target articles. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:19, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - This seems like a little bit of trivia and nothing more. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 05:32, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:07, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Quartet (Horse Racing Terminology) → Superfecta  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Was previously an article which essentially duplicated Superfecta but would have failed WP:NOTHOWTO. Implausible redirect with no incoming links, and no content worth merging across. (See also discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quinella (Horse Racing Terminology).) Kb.au (talk) 11:20, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Only used in the context of Hong Kong Jockey Club which does horse racing. If kept, it should be moved to Quartet (horse racing) without redirect. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:49, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Doesn't seem helpful. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 03:05, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:07, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikingia → Wikings-NSK  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• Wikings-NSK → Wikings  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

DELETE this is cleanup resulting from an AfD. The target was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikings (2nd nomination), so these redirects to the deleted topic no longer make sense. -- 70.52.11.217 (talk) 05:08, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Tagged as G6 (seeing that you made the move with the intent to not leave behind a redirect) and R3. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 14:31, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete under criterion G7, since this discussion was created by the user who moved the file. —C.Fred (talk) 14:35, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• File:This is a poster for Prasad.jpg → File:Prasad 2012.jpg  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Now a purposeless redirect with an absurd file name. --Kailash29792 (talk) 03:04, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Another reason not to keep this redirect is WP:R3. ----Kailash29792 (talk) 03:05, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to List of Megami Tensei video games#Shin Megami Tensei. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:04, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Shin Megami Tensei: Brand New Title → Megami Tensei  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Does not seem to be mentioned in the target page. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 02:05, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget - a search showed that it was an early title for Shin Megami Tensei 5. I imagine nobody changed the redirect target from the series article once the game article was created. It should be retargeted there. Sergecross73 msg me 04:01, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Shin Megami Tensei 5 per Serge. Btw Sergecross73, at RfD "keep" usually means "keep the current target", !votes to change the target usually use "retarget" as the bold keyword! ^_^ Ben · Salvidrim! ✉ 06:04, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Turns out there is not an article about Shin Megami Tensei 5 (yet, obviously) and that itself is a redirect. So Shin Megami Tensei: Brand New Title should redirect to the same place, retarget to List of Megami Tensei video games#Shin Megami Tensei until Shin Megami Tensei 5 is converted into a full article, then retarget there. Early trailers on the official Nintendo channel even use the "Brand New Title" appellation. Ben · Salvidrim! ✉ 06:09, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to List of Megami Tensei video games#Shin Megami Tensei until an article on Shin Megami Tensei V is created.--Alexandra IDV^talk 11:06, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:07, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Moh Shuvuu → Megami Tensei  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Minor monster not mentioned in the target page. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 02:04, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Like other demons in the Megami Tensei series, Moh Shuvuu is based on real mythology, apparently in this case Siberian. I don't think it's appropriate to redirect it to Megami Tensei - especially since it's not even mentioned there - and Moh Shuvuu (or Muu Shuwuu) isn't mentioned in Siberian mythology.--Alexandra IDV^talk 11:11, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unless someone's willing to create a Recurring elements in the Final Fantasy series equivalent for Megami Tensei to attract names of recurring monsters. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:13, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - per nom, Alexandra IDV. Sergecross73 msg me 17:11, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:27, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Nocturne (PS2 game) → Shin Megami Tensei: Nocturne  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Misleading, as there is another game that is just called "Nocturne" that isn't on PS2. We also don't disambiguate games by system. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 01:57, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The nominator has proven that the redirect is not ambiguous, and I agree. Steel1943 (talk) 15:18, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep How is it misleading? The "(PS2 game)" makes the title not ambiguous, therefore it's not misleading. It's a valid search term. We also don't disambiguate games by system. applies to articles titles. I see nothing wrong with redirects including system names if it is a useful search disambiguator. --The1337gamer (talk) 17:53, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - I agree with The1337gamer, I have no idea how it could be considered misleading.--Alexandra IDV^talk 19:34, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - per The1337gamer. The nomination would be valid proposal for an article title change, but not for deleting a redirect/search term. Sergecross73 msg me 17:10, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Unopposed. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:07, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Devil May Cry Series (video game) → Devil May Cry  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Devil May Cry Series (Video Game) → Devil May Cry  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

"Series" implies that it's not, in fact, a single video game. Devil May Cry Series also exists, so a disambiguation is pointless. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 01:43, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Is "Devil May Cry Series" a particular collection in the video game franchise? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:23, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • There is a 3 game pack called "Devil May Cry HD Collection", but it certainly doesn't encompass the whole series._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 13:34, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.