< January 12
January 14 >

January 13

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 13, 2017.

Mario (series)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget both to Mario (franchise). Thryduulf (talk) 14:29, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

...And now, it seems that I have to open this one for discussion as well. (See Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 January 13#The Little Mermaid (series).) Should these redirects target their current target (Super Mario) or Mario (franchise)? I'm opening this up for discussion to form consensus due to slow back-and-forth editing of these redirects for the past 3 years. (For the record, I'm for keep-ing the redirects targeting Super Mario.) Steel1943 (talk) 23:24, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging a few editors I'm aware of being involved in WP:VG with no knowledge of how they will comment in this discussion: Ferret, Salvidrim!, Sergecross73 and The1337gamer. Steel1943 (talk) 18:41, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Also, pinging Czar since they participated in the aforementioned move discussion, and I've seen them edit video game-related pages from time to time. Steel1943 (talk) 18:43, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Little Mermaid (series)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget. Thryduulf (talk) 14:32, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Should this be retargeted to The Little Mermaid (franchise)? I would imagine that readers looking up a "(series)" disambiguator are trying to find information for the franchise and not the TV series. Compare this to Mario (series) (redirects to its respective series article) and Mario (franchise); since The Little Mermaid doesn't have separate series and franchise articles, the "series" is probably the "franchise". Steel1943 (talk) 23:20, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Naomi van Dooren

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Thryduulf (talk) 14:35, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article. Also, delete per WP:REDLINK: see de:Van Dooren Sisters. Steel1943 (talk) 23:05, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Litigators (film)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Thryduulf (talk) 14:36, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The target is a novel, not a film. Delete as misleading as someone searching this would be looking for a film. -- Tavix (talk) 22:53, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

In Africa

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 18:01, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not a likely search term for the target, consider, In Europe, for example, there are exact topics with that title, just as there are with this one, but we don't seem to have articles on any of those. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 22:41, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It was created by accident; I wasn't aware it still existed. --Orange Mike | Talk 00:09, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sebastian (The Little Mermaid

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 18:00, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely and possibly WP:COSTLY redirect due to the missing ")" at the end of the disambiguator. Also, Sebastian (The Little Mermaid) (with the ")" at the end"), exists. Steel1943 (talk) 22:27, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Mission (2015 film)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete all. Thryduulf (talk) 14:37, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. None of these films are mentioned at the target article, presumably these are in development hell. -- Tavix (talk) 22:23, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Twin Earths (film)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Thryduulf (talk) 14:39, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, this is not a film, but a comic strip. There's no mention of any associated films at the target. -- Tavix (talk) 22:16, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Disney Sing Along Songs: Honor to Us All

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Retarget to Disney Sing-Along Songs#Honor to Us All (1998). In other words, I'm withdrawing this as the proposed target is obviously the intended target. Steel1943 (talk) 22:29, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The current target may be the best target for this redirect, but the redirect is not mentioned at the target article and it's a very unlikely search term. Steel1943 (talk) 22:15, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

American Darling

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Retarget American Darling to The Darling (novel). Delete American Darling (film). Thryduulf (talk) 14:41, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not mentioned at the target article. According to IMDb, the film is still stated as in development, so anything about it is WP:CRYSTAL -- Tavix (talk) 22:13, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Loudest noise in recorded history

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 February 2#Loudest noise in recorded history

The Picture of Dorian Gray (chapters)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 17:55, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia was a very different place a dozen years ago, so I don't want to disparage the work of the editor who put all of these together, but in hindsight, we can call firmly WP:NOT on this. The pages were essentially annotations to each chapter, including characters named and real-life entities referred to. The article on the novel mentions several chapters by name, but none with the depth of coverage implied by these redirects. Page views confirm they're quite unlikely as search terms too. --BDD (talk) 21:49, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Outdoor Retreat

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 January 31#Outdoor Retreat

Loudest man-made sound on Earth

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 February 2#Loudest man-made sound on Earth

Loudest Man in History

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 February 2#Loudest Man in History

Anni Sinnemaeki

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. The relisting did not result in any additional comments so I don't think another week or so will gain any more insight.Thryduulf (talk) 14:44, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(eubot) Finnish, not German. ä and ae are not equivalent in Finnish. AddWittyNameHere (talk) 05:31, 4 January 2017 (UTC) &+Paeivi Raesaenen (05:43 UTC) & Neljae Ruusua (05:53 UTC). Combined listings, exact same rationale. AddWittyNameHere (talk) 5:43, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Thryduulf (talk) 19:41, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gentleman's sport

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 17:53, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Too vague. Search results on and off of Wikipedia labeled golf, cricket, baseball, and even cockfighting (!) a "gentleman's sport". Boxing doesn't seem to have a special claim to the term, and the target article doesn't use it. BDD (talk) 19:40, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of most viewed kpop music videos

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 January 23#List of most viewed kpop music videos

拳闘

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 17:52, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FORRED. Boxing has no inherent connection with Japanese, Galician, or Spanish. --BDD (talk) 19:35, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Winter of 2010

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 January 23#Winter of 2010

Winter of 2009-2100 in the United Kingdom

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted, G7. -- Tavix (talk) 17:51, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The misleading typo makes it sound like the UK is in an ice age. -- Tavix (talk) 18:54, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

L calculus

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. -- Tavix (talk) 17:50, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Eubot) Weak delete. I would have thought this spelling was quite common, but actually a Gsearch gives me pretty much 0 results for this being used in any sources to mean this (in fact, the first source I get has it meaning something completely different), and it's had only three hits in ninety days. Yet unlike #Th (set theory), below, at least this makes some kind of sense, in not transliterating a Greek letter into a digraph. Si Trew (talk) 04:52, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's not difficult to imagine, but in practice it doesn't seem to happen much, if at all. Si Trew (talk) 12:21, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Godsy (TALKCONT) 18:51, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 18:17, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Unsourced Titanic passengers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget Eliza Gladys Milvina Dean to Millvina Dean and John van Billard to Passengers of the RMS Titanic. -- Tavix (talk) 20:29, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Both unmentioned at target and not sourced anywhere on Wikipedia. --Nevé–selbert 18:45, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 18:17, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

3909 04

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Legends and myths regarding RMS Titanic#The Titanic curse. -- Tavix (talk) 20:15, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Per Snopes: "the first element fails the veracity test because the number 3909 04 was not assigned to the Titanic as a hull number or as any other type of number: her official Board of Trade designation was 131,428, and the yard number assigned to her by Harland & Wolff was 401." --Nevé–selbert 18:40, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good find! striking vote. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:21, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@AngusWOOF: When a Titanic-related redirect gets nominated here it's always worth checking to see if the relevant content is (now) in one of the many (many) sub- and related articles. I'm not sure there is any other single event with quite so many different articles! Thryduulf (talk) 00:13, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 18:17, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

WorldEdit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 20:11, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in the target article. Per the redirect's history as an article, the redirect's subject would probably fail WP:NOTWIKIA as an article. Steel1943 (talk) 17:45, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 18:17, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mortal Kombat Ninjas

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 20:11, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Per the history of the redirect, it seems that this term was meant to refer to the ninja characters in the Mortal Kombat series such as Sub-Zero, Scorpion and Smoke. However, I'm not finding a specific article or a section in an article which this term would be helpful targeting, especially considering that the redirect is already a borderline WP:NOTWIKIA violation. The best target I can find is List of Mortal Kombat characters, but not even that page has a good section to refine this term. Steel1943 (talk) 22:39, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Even if it went to the characters article, it doesn't explain which of the characters are ninjas, especially if they're looking for the more prominent ninja characters like Sub-Zero, Scorpion, Kitana, Mileena, who immediately have their own article. Although I suppose once the user gets there, they can look through the entire list to further search for the ninja they want. I'll strike it for having some sort of use. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:01, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 17:43, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mortal Kimbat

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Mortal Kombat. -- Tavix (talk) 20:06, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely spelling error. In fact, it's so unlikely that apparently, no one has fixed it since it started targeting the disambiguation page over 8 years ago. Steel1943 (talk) 22:26, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 17:43, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Vgrelease tbl

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. -- Tavix (talk) 20:03, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused redirect template, should be deleted. Lordtobi (✉) 11:14, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 17:43, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Vgrtbl-nolink

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. -- Tavix (talk) 20:03, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused redirect template, should be deleted. Lordtobi (✉) 11:13, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 17:43, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Video game release new

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. -- Tavix (talk) 20:03, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused redirect template, former template was merged into ((Video game release)), should be deleted to unify the usage of ((Video game release)) or its short form ((Vgrelease)). Lordtobi (✉) 10:59, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 17:43, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Vgreleasenew

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. -- Tavix (talk) 20:03, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused redirect template, former target was merged into ((Video game release)), should be deleted to unify the usage of ((Video game release)) or its short form ((Vgrelease)). Lordtobi (✉) 10:58, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 17:43, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of Non Playable Characters in the Street Fighter series

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 19:54, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No such list exists at neither the target article nor at List of Street Fighter characters. Also, such a list's existence would probably fail WP:NOTWIKIA as WP:GAMECRUFT. Steel1943 (talk) 14:33, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That was from years ago and it's now redirect.Lg16spears (talk) 18:06, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 17:22, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gergely Sarkoezy

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. A relisting hasn't generated any additional input at all, so relisting again doesn't seem likely to be productive. Thryduulf (talk) 18:23, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a follow-up to Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 December 24#Sarkoez, closed as delete. If Sarkoez isn't a good redirect, then I would imagine that Sarkoezy would follow as they're both Hungarian. -- Tavix (talk) 21:44, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 17:12, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kavirat Rural District (dismabiguation)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 17:49, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Misspelled qualifier. NB Kavirat Rural District (disambiguation) exists. Narky Blert (talk) 16:41, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Niyog

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. I'll let Uanfala's disambiguation stand. -- Tavix (talk) 19:50, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Possible retarget to Niyoga and remove the hatnote there per WP:NOTDIC because from what I can gather, this is a synonym for Niyoga [2], not sure exactly if it is the case, though, we don't have an expert on these matters who is a regular at RFD, AFAIK. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 03:30, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 15:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Chocolate crust

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was complicated. There's clear consensus to retarget Raspberry pie to Raspberry Pi (with a hatnote) and Peach pie to list of pies, tarts and flans (I'll add an ((anchor)) to the list so it'll redirect directly to the correct entry). I find WP:ROUGHCONSENSUS to delete Chocolate crust. A retargeting proposal to the list of pies was thoroughly objected to as a chocolate crust can be used for other types of desserts and a late suggestion to crust (baking) didn't receive any favor from anyone else. That leaves deletion, which was explicitly argued by two participants, and perhaps implied by another. That being said, I'll allow recreation of the redirect if the term can be discussed somewhere in a general sense. -- Tavix (talk) 19:37, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target, except Raspberry_pie in a hatnote, so WP:R#DELETE 10, as it will not be helpful to a reader. These are far from implausible search terms, but the current situation is misleading. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 03:37, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 15:24, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Next Conservative Party (UK) leadership election

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 17:48, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Leadership elections for the Conservative Party in the UK do not happen to any schedule, and sometimes occur on very little notice. The 2016 election has been and gone, there are no others planned and I am not aware of any encyclopaedic content currently speculating on a next election to retarget it to. There is no content about leadership elections generally at Conservative Party (UK) or Leader of the Conservative Party (UK) - it might be possible to write something at one or the other, but given that I have strong views about UK politics I am not comfortable with writing significant content in this subject area for NPOV and COI reasons. So unless someone else writes such content, my recommendation is delete. Thryduulf (talk) 12:52, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tylenol

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 January 20#Tylenol

Wikipedia:WINING

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 January 20#Wikipedia:WINING

Talkpage redirects

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Retarget to Talk:James Mattis and Talk:Queen Elizabeth, respectively. Adding ((Old RfD)) tags to these pages would be confusing since thise templates are meant to represent a talk page's parent page, so syncing the talk pages with their parent pages' current target. However, I'm also closing this with the following statement, in case it needs to be said: If there is consensus to change the targets of Mad Dog Matis or Queen Liz in the future, there should be no controversy with syncing the two redirects nominated here by retargeting them to their parent page's new target. Also, it seems that Paine Ellsworth already synced Talk:Mad Dog Matis. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 19:15, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:G7. --Nevé–selbert 00:53, 13 January 2017 (UTC) Housekeeping, I think. --Nevé–selbert 23:05, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The first U.S President

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 04:27, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:RTYPO. It's also mostly unused with its daily average rendering only 1. --Nevé–selbert 00:30, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

1000000000000000

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Orders of magnitude (numbers)#1015. -- Tavix (talk) 19:39, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete or retarget. not names of large numbers. Voortle (talk) 00:17, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
More