< November 29
December 1 >

November 30

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 30, 2015.

God of light

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of light deities, which I just created. Thanks to Lenticel for getting me started. --BDD (talk) 15:27, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is apparently "one of the titles of Lúcifer in the body of Italian witchcraft known as Stregheria", but it's not mentioned at the target article and doesn't seem like a good search term for Lucifer. I'd expect this to redirect to a list of deities associated with light (cf. God of war → List of war deities). BDD (talk) 22:35, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So far I found these gods as fitting the "God of light" moniker.
  • Hyperion (mythology) - "God of Watchfulness, Wisdom and the Light"
  • Apollo - God of music, poetry, art, oracles, archery, plague, medicine, sun, light and knowledge
  • Aether - The god of the upper atmosphere and light.
  • Ao (mythology) - deity that is the personificiation of light
  • Horus as "Her-ur", the god of light
  • Heimdallr - Norse god of light (according to my search)

--Lenticel (talk) 03:12, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rejection of God

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. The discussion below has shown that "rejection of God" could refer to a few related concepts so a redirect could be confusing. Deryck C. 10:59, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure how plausible a search term this is, or that it's "close enough" to atheism. The phrase implies the existence of a god, so to me it makes me think of a biblical figure who "rejects" God in the sense of refusing to follow him. Indeed, the redirect originally pointed to Amalek (see Amalek#Judaist views of the Amalekites for context). This seems like more trouble than it's worth. BDD (talk) 22:32, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And as a WP:FIRSTSENTENCE "the x of y of z" is a study in indirection; it took me a long while to work out what it is an atheist is not believing in, the existence of something, or the belief in that existence. I think they don't believe in the thing, but it might be that they don't believe in the existence of the thing, or that the concept of the belief of the thing exists, but perhaps they might not believe in the belief of the existence. Nobody ever heard of the possessive case? Never mind, no doubt it was a hard-fought "compromise". Chop, chop, chop: Law of Demeter. And so to bed. Si Trew (talk) 00:25, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Subsequent !votes got me thinking about this more, so I'm going to stay neutral for now. I still think it's close enough for Atheism, but it could be close enough for other things too, potentially making this confusing. -- Tavix (talk) 18:05, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Light News

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete, G8. --BDD (talk) 23:04, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely redirect to a non-notable publication. This could mean a bunch of things Legacypac (talk) 04:06, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep. Delete the target if it's not notable, but until then, this is fine. Si Trew (talk) 22:17, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Similarly I tried searching for such things as Fluorescent Tubes Weekly, LED Digest and Matchbox Çollectors Journal. LEDs Magazine (here) did exist once, but was deleted in June 2015 as non-notable. LEUKOS, the Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (here), is red. Collectors of cigarette lighters are found wanting for a journal of record.
An R to soft media would be, I think, essentially WP:OR. Good news is, unsurprisingly, a DAB, on which publication The Good News is an entry, but the good news is not particularly light. City light is an R to tbe DAB at City lights (disambiguation), but City Lights is an article. We have Humor magazine but not Humour magazine nor Humorous weekly even though that term seems quite common). Si Trew (talk) 04:17, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
My checking found the paper was renamed CLN (from City Light News) some years ago, so this redirect is a real stretch. Legacypac (talk) 09:11, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 21:19, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The target City Light News is at AfD still due to relists. Could use comments. Legacypac (talk) 06:26, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gabriel Dante Rossetti

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep *Rossetti (except Gabriel Rossetti already retargeted to Gabriele Rossetti), delete others. Deryck C. 01:39, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

10 alternative names is too many.

Legacypac (talk) 10:45, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 21:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Brown Sequard

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 December 12#Brown Sequard

Islamic Arab

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 December 12#Islamic Arab

Filippo Iannone

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close. Thanks, Si! --BDD (talk) 15:06, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion, redirect to non-English wiki. Bamyers99 (talk) 19:54, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There is no English page for this person. Page redirects appropriately to the correct page. --Stunink (talk) 20:35, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ryszard Kasyna

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 01:24, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion, redirect to non-English wiki. Bamyers99 (talk) 19:54, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There is no English page for this person. Page redirects appropriately to the correct page. --Stunink (talk) 20:37, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Fernando José Monteiro Guimarães

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 01:24, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion, redirect to non-English wiki. Bamyers99 (talk) 19:54, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There is no English page for this person. Page redirects appropriately to the correct page. --Stunink (talk) 20:37, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Irrationalism

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 01:25, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion, the redirect points at a section in the article that doesn't exist. The target article doesn't contain the word "irrationalism", or "rational", or really anything to do with the original redirect, so it doesn't make any sense WP:RFD#D5. MCSDWVL (talk) 19:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Arab Islam

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete all. Deryck C. 01:28, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The target article is about a group of people (Muslims) by ethnicity, so I think these terms are misleading. They suggest an ideology (e.g., a strain of Islam or pan-Arabism) or artistic movement (e.g., architectural). The ones that use "Islamist" are especially egregious, since that can be an inflammatory term. Finally, some of these are just nonsense terms. --BDD (talk) 18:58, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, @BDD: I've pissed on your bonfire a bit by moving the target over the redirect to Arab Muslim (and fixing then for singular versus plural, per WP:TITLE); but I don't think that makes this nomination invalid. No bot has fixed the double redirects yet. Si Trew (talk) 20:57, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe reverse that. Articles on ethnic groups typically use plural titles. See Arabs, Hungarians, Indigenous Australians, etc. --BDD (talk) 21:05, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe, I had second thoughts too: but I can't do that as a no-admin: no problem if you as admin do. The article as such is rather thin, anyway, and I've marked it as {[tlx|islam stub)). Si Trew (talk) 21:18, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Done --BDD (talk) 22:37, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ted Cruz In Defense of Christians controversy

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 01:26, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This was redirected as the result of an AfD more than a year ago, to allow for the possibility of a merge. That hasn't been carried out, and the controversy isn't mentioned on Cruz's page. (I'm pretty well informed about American politics, and I had never heard of it.) Editors interested in merging anything can still contact an admin for access. In the meantime, this is just going to mislead and disappoint readers. BDD (talk) 18:55, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pro-Nazi

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete all. Deryck C. 01:30, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The target article is too specific to redirect from the general idea of being "pro-Nazi". Besides the Nazis themselves, many Nazi-era Germans were "pro-Nazi", as are neo-Nazis of any period. For now, I think variants that specify "Nazi Germany" or "during World War II" are ok, but not the ones that are just about support for Nazism generally. --BDD (talk) 16:20, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Nazi. Opposition to Nazis. Legacypac (talk) 00:55, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

H-B Woodlawn Chamber Singers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete as unopposed. Deryck C. 01:28, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable student club not mentioned at the target article. BDD (talk) 15:40, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Unipers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Target section no longer exists and editors in the discussion below think that it's unlikely that UniPers will become notable enough to be covered on Wikipedia in the future. Deryck C. 01:32, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete redirect, these look like aliases:

Lüboslóv Yęzýkin (talk) 12:54, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Amphibium

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 December 12#Amphibium

More