The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep the last two, delete the rest. --BDD (talk) 16:11, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Æsthetes → Aestheticism  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• Æstheticisers → Aestheticism  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Æstheticising → Aestheticism  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Æstheticised → Aestheticism  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Æstheticise → Aestheticism  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Æstheticisations → Aestheticism  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Æstheticisation → Aestheticism  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Æstheticizer → Aestheticism  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Æstheticizing → Aestheticism  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Æstheticized → Aestheticism  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Æstheticizes → Aestheticism  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Æstheticize → Aestheticism  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Æstheticizations → Aestheticism  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Æstheticization → Aestheticism  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Æstheticistically → Aestheticism  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Æstheticistical → Aestheticism  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Æstheticistic → Aestheticism  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Æstheticists → Aestheticism  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Æstheticist → Aestheticism  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Æstheticisms → Aestheticism  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• Æstheticism → Aestheticism  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]  (proposed keep)
• Æsthetic Movement → Aestheticism  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] (proposed keep)

These are from a list of 72 redirects created in a row, but I've singled them out for having an AE combo letter at the beginning which makes them highly unlikely to be useful. Part of target 23 [1] Legacypac (talk) 19:42, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all - this topic isn't especially relevant to Old English or any of the modern languages that use the Æ ligature, and even if it was then this construction is likely to be nonsense, in the same way as if it was spelled with a W, the number 2, or an emoji. (👾stheticism, anyone?) Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 21:09, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep harmless. Note that the spelling with the ligature is perfectly ordinary modern English. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 13:18, 17 November 2015 (UTC).[reply]
  
• Ah, so it is. I guess in that case, keep Æsthetic Movement and Æstheticism as valid alternate names. Delete the rest as impropering modific👾ions. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 22:07, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all except for the two that Ivan singled out... per him. -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:22, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 16:01, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion for Gazpur[edit]

This is a city in India with 121,000 people (a super small city for India). It is also a district with over 3 million people. I am confident they do not have 92 different ways to spell the city name. [2] Just mass delete except for the previous spellings of Ghazeepore, Gauspur, and Ghazipour as shown in the city article. I'll modified the 3 good ones to point to the much larger Ghazipur district and will watch them. The rest are just imagined misspellings. Legacypac (talk) 19:12, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment The three good ones are NOT in the list above. These are all Neelix creations made by mixing and matching portions of valid former names with each other, and/or his own imagination. While no one has commented I assert these should be deleted as G6 Housekeeping Neelix redirect cleanup Legacypac (talk) 03:06, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Since it's a waste of time to go through each spelling to see its use, I wouldn't be opposed to a delete all and any that might have some utility can be recreated. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete all. JohnCD (talk) 19:58, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Glacial growings → Glacier ice accumulation  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Glacial growing → Glacier ice accumulation  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Grew glacial ice → Glacier ice accumulation  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Grew glacier ice → Glacier ice accumulation  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

The most implausible typos/bad English in a batch of 125 redirects by Neelix. Legacypac (talk) 18:50, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 05:13, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 19:52, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Asking your crush out → Dating  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A very little used redirect and a very unusual search term. I know redirects are cheap, but they're not cheap enough for my taste. Drmies (talk) 18:25, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete if you need that search term to find dating, you are too young for dating. Legacypac (talk) 18:37, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete one does not inherently lead to the other. But generally per Drmies. --kelapstick^{(on the run)}
• Delete not synonymous, probably a violation of WP:HOWTO --Lenticel ^(talk) 04:23, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete asking does not only lead to dating, it can result in rejection -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 05:13, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Limerence, maybe. I can see a possibility that someone might use this search to find information about the general phenomenon, rather than actual instructions. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 21:14, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:YOU. Asking one's crush out is red. Si Trew (talk) 03:31, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete all. JohnCD (talk) 22:56, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Built up ice → Glacier ice accumulation  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Builds up ice → Glacier ice accumulation  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Build up ice → Glacier ice accumulation  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Building up ice → Glacier ice accumulation  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Build ups of ice → Glacier ice accumulation  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Build-ups of ice → Glacier ice accumulation  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Buildups of ice → Glacier ice accumulation  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Build up of ice → Glacier ice accumulation  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Build-up of ice → Glacier ice accumulation  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Buildup of ice → Glacier ice accumulation  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Accumulating ice → Glacier ice accumulation  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Accumulated ice → Glacier ice accumulation  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Accumulates ice → Glacier ice accumulation  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Accumulate ice → Glacier ice accumulation  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Accumulations of ice → Glacier ice accumulation  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Accumulation of ice → Glacier ice accumulation  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Ice accumulations → Glacier ice accumulation  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Ice accumulation → Glacier ice accumulation  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Ice build ups → Glacier ice accumulation  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Ice build-ups → Glacier ice accumulation  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Ice buildups → Glacier ice accumulation  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Ice build up → Glacier ice accumulation  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Ice build-up → Glacier ice accumulation  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Ice buildup → Glacier ice accumulation  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

not specific enough to redirect anywhere. All kinds of refrigeration equipment can build up ice, road ice, windshields, etc. Legacypac (talk) 18:17, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all - too vague to be useful. I first thought of atmospheric icing but even that is a broad topic. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 21:44, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all. Glacier ice is not the only kind of ice. Ice is not the only that can build up or be built up, and we wouldn't sensibly have a DAB or redirect for build-up of Lego, build-up of limescale and a build-up of every other fungible thing (let alone a backlog), so we shouldn't create one for this. I first thought of atmospheric icing too, actually. Icing is a DAB, but not everything there involves the accumulation of ice. Si Trew (talk) 04:18, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as vague as in can pertain to a lot of things. --Lenticel ^(talk) 05:00, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• strong delete there are many topics for this, several more likely that glaciation, such as icing on airplanes, icedams on roofs, collapsing trees in icestorms, etc -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 05:15, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete both. JohnCD (talk) 19:40, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Weed ate → String trimmer  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Weeteat → String trimmer  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unlikely typo for weed eater, two of the more obscure redirects in a large 125 redirect batch Legacypac (talk) 18:11, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - not what I thought of when I saw this. Implausible construction regardless. Considered Wheaties as a mishearing, but that's also pretty unlikely. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 19:41, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Me neither. --BDD (talk) 21:29, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete both, WP:RFD#D2 confusing. Si Trew (talk) 04:32, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not about Wheaties, nor about marijuana -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 05:16, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:01, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Jesús Galindo → San Francisco Giants minor league players  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not listed at the target article and the player is currently a free agent so there is no replacement article to target it to. Spanneraol (talk) 17:33, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 19:38, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Retrogenesis → Alzheimer's disease  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Retrogenesis is a theory about Alzheimer's disease, but it's not mentioned in our article. Delete per WP:REDLINK. BDD (talk) 17:10, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete to encourage article creation --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:34, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nom CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 17:10, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 23:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Don Juan and Molière → Boris Eifman  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

WP:RFD#D2 confusing, WP:RFD#D5 makes no sense. neither the words "Don Juan" nor "Molière" appear in it.

I took it to WP:CSD as something of a test case for WP:G8: at that time it was an R to section that didn't exist. This as reverted by User:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz with this edit and the edit comment "that the target article was restructured to eliminate the section anchor does not justify summary deletion of the redirect" – and removing the section link entirely. So without the section link it now definitely makes no sense. Si Trew (talk) 16:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

At the time the redirect was created, the target section existed and involved the named work. Being an obsolete redirect is not currently a speedy deletion criterion. That's why I declined the speedy. Discussion here may result in deletion of the redirect, but could plausibly result in restoration of relevant text to the article. That potential outcome makes speedy deletion inappropriate. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 16:11, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, that's normal WP:BRD. I would have thought the wording in WP:G8, " redirects to invalid targets, such as non-existent targets,", includes redirects that target non-existent sections; but the rest of G8 talks about pages. It's equally arguable that any R to a redlink should not qualify for G8, since a discussion could plausibly result in restoration of the page (or retargeting). Si Trew (talk) 16:14, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. This discussion demonstrated that the title of the redirect is too vague to be useful. Deryck C. 12:31, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Governorate Council in al-Anbar, 2005 → Al-Anbar governorate council election, 2005  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

With the word "election" missing, this redirect is nonsense. PanchoS (talk) 15:03, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - readers searching for information on this governorate council will find it at the election article. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 15:10, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The target article only discusses the election, and not what the council did in 2005. I think the search term implies a reader is seeking information on that instance of the council. As far as I can tell, that's not discussed anywhere on Wikipedia, for 2005 or at all. There's no Al-Anbar governorate council page, and Al Anbar Governorate#Government is just a listing of a few officials. --BDD (talk) 15:52, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as not specific enough and not helpful to the reader. Legacypac (talk) 18:38, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per BDD as this implies what the Council did in 2005, not the election. Since we don't have information on the topic, we should delete it either as confusing or per WP:REDLINK. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 23:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• 2016 Citi Open → Washington Open (tennis)  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

WP:TOOEARLY. 333-blue 11:28, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Restore article to this revision. It needs references, but this tournament is announced and scheduled. I don't think there's anything in policy that says "[w]e need to wait till it's about a month from happening" before creating the article, to quote user Fyunck(click) who redirected it. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 15:28, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  Just because it's scheduled and announced doesn't mean it needs an article yet. Otherwise it's just mostly blanks. There isn't even a 2016 Australian Open article yet, but that should happen soon since it's in January. Next August is way too early. Fyunck(click) (talk) 23:11, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. This can be recreated at the appropriate time. -- Tavix ^(talk) 02:15, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment it's less than a year away, so not exactly too early for an article, and certainly not for a redirect. -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 05:19, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. There's no mention at the target, so it's WP:ASTONISHing; and we can't write much enyclopaedic about it. We could just add a bit of info to the target, e.g. that it will take place from 16 to 24 July 2016 at Rock Creek Park Tennis Center, Washington, DC.^{[jumbo pingpong 1]} Si Trew (talk) 12:50, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. JohnCD (talk) 19:35, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Logansport, IN μSA → Cass County, Indiana  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Seems fairly implausible with the "μ" replacing the U in USA Linkle (talk) 14:56, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - we've had these before, μSA is a geostatistical term: micropolitan statistical area. I'm wondering if this should go to Logansport, Indiana though. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 15:34, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - according to [3] and comparing to our articles on Logansport, Indiana and Cass County, Indiana, the μSA is synonymous with the county, the city lies within it. So the current target is right. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 15:47, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: in the nominator's defense, this article doesn't explicitly say that it's a μSA, unlike some of the others that have been nominated. For those keeping score, here's the list of μSA RFD's:

• 27 July 2009 (withdrawn)
• 18 September 2010 (delete)
• 27 September 2010 (keep all)
• 13 July 2015 (keep)
• 8 August 2015 (keep) -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:03, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for looking those up. I think it's fine that it's not mentioned there, someone entering this as a search term very likely already knows what a μSA is, and it couldn't possibly refer to anything else. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 16:51, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• In any case, I added it. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:11, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Is there an easy way to put a note on the 500+ redirection pages with "μSA" in the title to help avoid repetition of nominations? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hydronium Hydroxide (talk • contribs) 13:53, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps a dedicated Rcat; compare to ((R from postal code)). ((R from census code))? --BDD (talk) 15:30, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 18:55, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Joint Special OperationS Command - JSOC → Joint Special Operations Command (Jordan)  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete: Implausible caps error combined with an unnatural way of disambiguating. -- Tavix ^(talk) 06:15, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Joint Special Operations Command is also JSOC, and the primary topic of that. -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 07:03, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Don't delete per WP:RFD#K5 - it has 323 hits in the last 60 days. Likely an external link. If not for that I would certainly agree with deletion. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 15:37, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • That doesn't mean it refers to Jordan. The one in the United States would be even more likely to use such a formulation -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 05:22, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - never mind, the page was moved here for less than a minute in 2012: [4] [5] and the stats tool is probably showing me hits from the properly capitalized Joint Special Operations Command - JSOC since we discovered it's not case sensitive. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 15:51, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 23:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Boczek → Bacon  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete per WP:RFOREIGN. -- Tavix ^(talk) 05:57, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete WP:NOTDIC Wikipedia is not a translation dictionary; general topic with no particular affinity for Polish. -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 07:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak retarget as ((R from fictional character)) and ((R from surname)) to Świat według Kiepskich#Others, where Arnold Boczek, a butcher, is mentioned. The talk page says this form of meat is not cured; pl:Boczek has a (not much) fuller explanation, so otherwise WP:REDLINK. Si Trew (talk) 08:05, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:NOTDIC Legacypac (talk) 03:08, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete all. JohnCD (talk) 18:57, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vouloir[edit]

Avoir[edit]

Etre[edit]

Parler[edit]

Partir[edit]

Ouvrir[edit]

Venir[edit]