The result of the debate was speedy-deleted because 1) the redirect's creator and primary editor is the person nominating it for deletion and 2) in deference to the BLP concerns cited below. Rossami (talk) 15:08, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The subject of this redirect has made it clear that she does not want to be mentioned in connection with the court case [1]. She then replaced the redirect with an article about herself [2], but she is clearly not notable aside from her involvement in the case. Further she added a mis-spelling of her name to the People v. Jovanovic article[3], which again is unacceptable. In light of the "do no harm" doctrine of WP:BLP, and considering that the vast majority of the news coverage at the time did not mention her name, I think it prudent to remove her name from Wikipedia. I just removed it from the People v. Jovanovic article [4] and now the redirect should also be removed, so that search engines won't find it anymore. AxelBoldt (talk) 23:30, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was delete. WjBscribe 02:18, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

---

Several of stage names used by a Czech porn actress. Nella is common female name, Nelli has quite a many uses (here e.g. Herva Nelli), Mirva is a singer from Latvia (no article yet). Pavel Vozenilek (talk) 21:37, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was delete. Content added has been moved to mustard oil. — Hex (❝?!❞) 18:59, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No notability and doesn't need to exist even as a redirect. It's a new article that was promptly changed to a redirect. Lilac Soul ^{(talk • contribs • count)} 15:39, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Unlikely search term, and unlikely to become a full-fledged article soon. --Fabrictramp (talk) 15:54, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep At first instance it does seem to be unnecessary but given some time it will definately develop into an article or maybe an article might arise out of this . Have a relook i have modified it a little bit . —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yesprimeminister (talk • contribs) 13:17, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was delete. WjBscribe 00:43, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

---

Another cross-namespace redirect, like inherent notability. Uncle G (talk) 15:03, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete inappropriate; no incoming links. –Pomte 02:54, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was keep. WjBscribe 00:40, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

---

Unused orphan redirect Guroadrunner (talk) 09:34, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: "unused" is different from "useless"; this particular redirect makes sense as a possible search term, as well as being a logical term to link to. Tizio 15:25, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep reasonable search term. –Pomte 03:01, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The nominator completely misses the main point of redirects. Their primary function is to provide results for search terms. Abberley2 (talk) 14:54, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was Deleted (db-attack). -- JLaTondre 15:05, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unneccesary. David Pro (talk) 13:12, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was delete. Halloween Jack (comics) was moved to Halloween Jack and a disambiguation header added. — Hex (❝?!❞) 19:13, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Offensive redirect. David Pro (talk) 13:18, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Halloween Jack (comics). Since it's a possible term search. David Pro (talk) 14:26, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Behind the PROD-deleted pagehistory is evidence that this name was a persona created by Bowie for the 1974 concept album Diamond Dogs so I do not think that the redirect can be considered "offensive". Nevertheless, your proposed target makes more sense since the Bowie persona was a one-time act and not particularly notable. Retarget and consider a history-only undeletion. Rossami (talk) 15:27, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Move Halloween Jack (comics)to Halloween Jack. Maybe add a for the David Bowie act, see David Bowie. - Koweja (talk) 05:01, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was keep. --- RockMFR 18:24, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Implausible typo. David Pro (talk) 18:42, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - disagree with nom. I actually thought this guy's name was Enrique Inglesias until this was brought up. Plausible typo redirect. Guroadrunner (talk) 21:26, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I too disagree with the nominator. Though I knew the correct spelling, I have seen this incorrect spelling in print. --Kimon^talk 03:01, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep since redirs are cheap, and tag with ((R from misspelling)). David Pro (talk) 14:21, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was keep. — Hex (❝?!❞) 19:13, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unneccesary. David Pro (talk) 18:48, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Celebritarian is the name of his art movement. Celebritarian corporation also redirects there. Munci (talk) 22:57, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep justfied by article's non-trivial mention of the Celebritarian Corporation. –Pomte 03:01, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was speedy deleted (G3). --- RockMFR 00:28, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Offensive redirect. David Pro (talk) 18:55, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - nonsense redirect Guroadrunner (talk) 21:26, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.