The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:05, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Akatsuki spacecraft JAXA.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• If the JAXA copyright language claims free for education, non-commercial use, this is not PD or free image on WP, and should be treated as non-free. MASEM (t) 00:32, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• It is possible to contact JAXA via this application form for the image to be used, because there will be no other way to illustrate the space probe, and the other image on Wikipedia of the spacecraft are inaccurate:

[1]LL221W (talk) 07:54, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I believe that this image definitely falls under the fair use doctrines. Ceannlann gorm (talk) 10:55, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The footer at http://www.isas.jaxa.jp/j/index.shtml says "Copyright 2010 Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency". --Stefan2 (talk) 13:37, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Non-free but consider keeping as non-replaceable, seeing as it's in space and it's unclear whether free images of the spacecraft exist. (ESkog)^(Talk) 17:03, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• I, the uploader of the file, has changed the permission template to a educational or non-commercial template. I suggest that someone should contact JAXA via the application form mentioned above, as this image is worth keeping.--LL221W (talk) 22:26, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 23:01, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The file is non-free, and replaceable (WP:NFCC#1 violation) by File:Akatsuki.png. Finnusertop (talk | guestbook | contribs) 03:53, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: File:Akatsuki.png is not an accurate depiction of the spacecraft. (The antenna flat, and does not have a pin in the centre.)49.181.202.246 (talk) 12:00, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:05, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wisbechcrest150.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No indication that the uploader created this file or is the original copyright holder. No source is provided so the copyright status cannot be verified. Image is being used on the Wisbech Town FC official website, but all the copyright of all content on that website is held by Wisbech Town FC. Image was uploaded to Wikipedia in June 2008 and this April 2008 archived version of the club's official website shows the image being used, so it is possible the image came from there. A png version of the same file (c:File:Wisbechcrest150.png) was uploaded to Commons, but it has been deleted as a copyright violation. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:40, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BethNaught (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:12, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Omar Omar.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The uploader is simultaneously claiming the picture is his work and that he's the subject of the picture. Given the subject of the picture is not holding a camera, this is not reasonably possible. If he's not the creator of the picture, he has no right to put it into the public domain. Nat Gertler (talk) 05:55, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:05, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jlwstevieray.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Looks like a scan of a photo "Joe Louis Walker and Stevie Ray Vaughan", unclear that license/author given "Nick James" is correct. Deadstar (talk) 11:46, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:05, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Riot police in Tbilisi 2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Source website does not specify whether derivative works or commercial use of its copyrighted materials are allowed. Kelly ^hi! 13:01, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:05, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ringmaster goldenstate.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Ted trivial pursuit.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Trostle bearcat lowspeed.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Wolgast bf109 carrier.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Diva velvia full.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

• Photos of remote-control toy airplanes. These may be non-free derivative works - toy airplanes are one of the examples given at Commons here. Kelly ^hi! 13:56, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:05, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sarah khan jpeg 00009767.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Tagged as "own work" but rights are likely held by the original publication cited in image description page. Additionally, source site indicates that they are simply taking images from other, unstated sources and hosting them. (ESkog)^(Talk) 17:01, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ^xplicit 01:43, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ramshornthree.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unclear whether the uploader is the copyright holder. Kelly ^hi! 17:19, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Yes, I am the copyright holder. Cparkhill1730 (talk) 01:53, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:05, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:RedGrooms.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• As the uploader is not the copyright holder of the photo, but claims to be his son, we probably need some sort of OTRS evidence. Kelly ^hi! 17:25, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:05, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rosie as a golf tee.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Source page doesn't give any information on authorship or copyright status. Kelly ^hi! 17:39, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:05, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rosie entertaining children.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Source page doesn't give any information on authorship or copyright status. Kelly ^hi! 17:40, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:05, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sankat Mochan Hanumaan Temple noon-time, Beawar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Sankat Mochan Hanumaan Temple evening-time, Beawar.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Beawar Panoramic Night View.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

• Web resolution, lack of metadata, and limited contrib history indicate that uploader may not be copyright holder. Kelly ^hi! 18:32, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:05, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Serbian Campaign 1915.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No source given for base map. Kelly ^hi! 20:18, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.