The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Legoktm (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:06, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beth Jacob Synagogue Regina Saskatchewan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The website in which it is published states no where that it is free along with this line - COPYRIGHT © 2006 CANADIAN PLAINS RESEARCH CENTER, UNIVERSITY OF REGINA and this page. So I raise an issue about this image. Sohambanerjee1998 06:41, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • The photo was taken and published by the Regina Leader-Post in 1950. That was where the copyright existed. The Encyclopedia of Saskatchewan text is indeed copyright but may be freely quoted if footnoted, as in any published text. The Encyclopedia did not and does not hold copyright to the photo and it may freely be reproduced. Out of courtesy though not as required by copyright law, its immediate source is noted in the Wikipedia article. Masalai (talk) 07:04, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Since it was created/published in 1950, it can't have entered the public domain in Canada before 1 January 1996 so it's unfree in the US per URAA. January (talk) 11:50, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by January (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:10, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pfcgoldcrest.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Logo artwork, not necessarily uploaders to relicense Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:39, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep, relicensed--Ymblanter (talk) 11:48, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pfcpurplecrest2011.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Logo artwork, not necessarily the up-loaders to relicense Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:40, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've amended the licensing to non-free. January (talk) 13:45, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:09, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Legoktm (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:06, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:RK py lake.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No evidence uploader is copyright holder - camera metadata says "Scott Meadows". Kelly ^hi! 20:21, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Legoktm (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:06, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rob - promo 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly ^hi! 20:33, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.