The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: deleted offending revision. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:15, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jamia.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Overwritten file. The current revision is a copyright violation.[1] Stefan2 (talk) 15:13, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portrait of Fahmida Mirza.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Exists in much higher resolution here. Possibly copyvio. Stefan2 (talk) 15:17, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dc-2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Found on numerous website (result) + source states: candid photo -> not own work Morning Sunshine (talk) 15:24, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mountains.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The uploader wrote "Source: http://forum.index.hu/Article/showArticle?na_start=". The image isn't on that page. If the image comes from an unconfirmed Hungarian forum, it may be unfree. Stefan2 (talk) 15:35, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G5 by January (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:11, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Greg Clark.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Treasury website, copyright section (http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/terms_copyright.htm) section 5 is clear that images do not fall under Open Govt type licences. Not sure if this is speedy territory or not. Blue Square Thing (talk) 19:51, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • The images are fine as they have been released under the Open Government Licence, if you look at all the Treasury Ministers all their ministerial images have been released under the OGL. This page tells people about the OGL: Commons:UK Open Government Licence and was created by the Administrator User:Jdforrester who seems to know alot about the OGL, so I would recommend people to ask for his opinion on the images as he is sort of an "expert". There is also this website http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/ where you write to Government Departments and ask for image to be released under the Open Government Licence. If you go on the National Archives and view the section about the OGL you will see that images are not exempt from usage meaning that I am free to use the images in order to make wikipedia articles better: http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ Yum Yum Hornblower (talk) 19:58, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For the record I'd like to make clear that the user above has removed reference to a potential SP investigation in their edit (see this diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2012_September_15&diff=prev&oldid=512720126). SP request is about to filed. Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:10, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• • • The image of File:Mark hoban high.jpg has been released under the same copyright as the above:http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/terms_copyright.htm and was uploaded by User:Magnus Manske/User:File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske), and was then transfered by user User:Innotata. If there was something wrong with the copyright or the OGL I don't believe they would have uploaded them if they thought that there was any copyright infringement. Yum Yum Hornblower (talk) 20:11, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • For the record: Commons:User:File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske) is operated by different users through a web interface. Some of the users might not know how copyright works. The uploader has removed information from this discussion multiple times. See here. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:18, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Totoro.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work, see Commons:COM:TOYS and File:My Neighbor Totoro - Tonari no Totoro (Movie Poster).jpg. No evidence that the uploader really is the man who made the Youtube film. Painting by Katsushika Hokusai in the background is obviously PD-old. Stefan2 (talk) 21:05, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.